Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
If building lld without x86 support, tests that require that support should
be treated as unsupported, not errors.
Tested using:
1. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64;X86'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 1406
Unsupported Tests : 287
2. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 410
Unsupported Tests : 1283
Patch by Joel Jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47748
llvm-svn: 334095
Summary:
This protects calls to longjmp from transferring control to arbitrary
program points. Instead, longjmp calls are limited to the set of
registered setjmp return addresses.
This also implements /guard:nolongjmp to allow users to link in object
files that call setjmp that weren't compiled with /guard:cf. In this
case, the linker will approximate the set of address taken functions,
but it will leave longjmp unprotected.
I used the following program to test, compiling it with different -guard
flags:
$ cl -c t.c -guard:cf
$ lld-link t.obj -guard:cf
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <stdio.h>
jmp_buf buf;
void g() {
printf("before longjmp\n");
fflush(stdout);
longjmp(buf, 1);
}
void f() {
if (setjmp(buf)) {
printf("setjmp returned non-zero\n");
return;
}
g();
}
int main() {
f();
printf("hello world\n");
}
In particular, the program aborts when the code is compiled *without*
-guard:cf and linked with -guard:cf. That indicates that longjmps are
protected.
Reviewers: ruiu, inglorion, amccarth
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43217
llvm-svn: 325047
Fangrui Song