Summary:
Need to reorder the operands to have the callee as the last argument.
Adds a pseudo-instruction, and a pass to lower it into a real
call_indirect.
This is the first of two options for how to fix the problem.
Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25708
llvm-svn: 284840
This saves a small amount of code size, and is a first small step toward
passing values on the stack across block boundaries.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20450
llvm-svn: 270294
Currently WebAssembly has two kinds of relocations; data addresses and
function addresses. This adds ELF relocations for them, as well as an
MC symbol kind to indicate which type of relocation is needed.
llvm-svn: 257416
Add return type information to call and call_indirect instructions. This
allows them to be disambiguated without knowledge of the callee.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15484
llvm-svn: 255565
With the '=' suffix now indicating which operands are output operands, it's
no longer as important to distinguish between a call's inputs and its outputs
using operand ordering, so we can go back to printing them in the normal order.
llvm-svn: 253925
This distinguishes input operands from output operands. This is something of
a syntactic experiment to see whether the mild amount of clutter this adds is
outweighed by the extra information it conveys to the reader.
llvm-svn: 253922
This also takes the push/pop syntax another step forward, introducing stack
slot numbers to make it easier to see how expressions are connected. For
example, the value pushed in $push7 is popped in $pop7.
And, this begins an experiment with making get_local and set_local implicit
when an operation directly uses or defines a register. This greatly reduces
clutter. If this experiment succeeds, it may make sense to do this for
const instructions as well.
And, this introduces more special code for ARGUMENTS; hopefully this code
will soon be obviated by proper support for live-in virtual registers.
llvm-svn: 253465
Switch to MC for instruction printing.
This encompasses several changes which are all interconnected:
- Use the MC framework for printing almost all instructions.
- AsmStrings are now live.
- This introduces an indirection between LLVM vregs and WebAssembly registers,
and a new pass, WebAssemblyRegNumbering, for computing a basic the mapping.
This addresses some basic issues with argument registers and unused registers.
- The way ARGUMENT instructions are handled no longer generates redundant
get_local+set_local for every argument.
This also changes the assembly syntax somewhat; most notably, MC's printing
does not use sigils on label names, so those are no longer present, and
push/pop now have a sigil to keep them unambiguous.
The usage of set_local/get_local/$push/$pop will continue to evolve
significantly. This patch is just one step of a larger change.
llvm-svn: 252910
This encompasses several changes which are all interconnected:
- Use the MC framework for printing almost all instructions.
- AsmStrings are now live.
- This introduces an indirection between LLVM vregs and WebAssembly registers,
and a new pass, WebAssemblyRegNumbering, for computing a basic the mapping.
This addresses some basic issues with argument registers and unused registers.
- The way ARGUMENT instructions are handled no longer generates redundant
get_local+set_local for every argument.
This also changes the assembly syntax somewhat; most notably, MC's printing
use sigils on label names, so those are no longer present, and push/pop now
have a sigil to keep them unambiguous.
The usage of set_local/get_local/$push/$pop will continue to evolve
significantly. This patch is just one step of a larger change.
llvm-svn: 252858
Modelling of the expression stack is evolving. This patch takes another
step by making pushes explicit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14338
llvm-svn: 252334
Summary:
Follow the same syntax as for the spec repo. Both have evolved slightly
independently and need to converge again.
This, along with wasmate changes, allows me to do the following:
echo "int add(int a, int b) { return a + b; }" > add.c
./out/bin/clang -O2 -S --target=wasm32-unknown-unknown add.c -o add.wack
./experimental/prototype-wasmate/wasmate.py add.wack > add.wast
./sexpr-wasm-prototype/out/sexpr-wasm add.wast -o add.wasm
./sexpr-wasm-prototype/third_party/v8-native-prototype/v8/v8/out/Release/d8 -e "print(WASM.instantiateModule(readbuffer('add.wasm'), {print:print}).add(42, 1337));"
As you'd expect, the d8 shell prints out the right value.
Reviewers: sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13712
llvm-svn: 250480
This new syntax is built around putting each instruction on its own line
in a "mnemonic op, op, op" like syntax. It also uses conventional data
section directives like ".byte" and so on rather than requiring everything
to be in hierarchical S-expression format. This is a more natural syntax
for a ".s" file format from the perspective of LLVM MC and related tools,
while remaining easy to translate into other forms as needed.
llvm-svn: 249364
Summary: I forgot to squash git commits before doing an svn dcommit of D12219. Reverting, and re-submitting.
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12298
llvm-svn: 245886
Derek Schuff