Most immediates are printed in Aarch64InstPrinter using 'formatImm' macro,
but not all of them.
Implementation contains following rules:
- floating point immediates are always printed as decimal
- signed integer immediates are printed depends on flag settings
(for negative values 'formatImm' macro prints the value as i.e -0x01
which may be convenient when imm is an address or offset)
- logical immediates are always printed as hex
- the 64-bit immediate for advSIMD, encoded in "a🅱️c:d:e:f:g:h" is always printed as hex
- the 64-bit immedaite in exception generation instructions like:
brk, dcps1, dcps2, dcps3, hlt, hvc, smc, svc is always printed as hex
- the rest of immediates is printed depends on availability
of -print-imm-hex
Signed-off-by: Maciej Gabka <maciej.gabka@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski <pawel.osmialowski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16929
llvm-svn: 269446
If we don't, values that aren't precisely representable in f16 could
be used as-is in a promoted f32 operation, which would produce
incorrect results.
AArch64 had the correct behavior; add a focused test.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR26871
llvm-svn: 268700
Summary:
This change enables frame pointer elimination in non-leaf functions.
The -fomit-frame-pointer option still needs to be used when compiling
via clang (or an equivalent method of not setting the
'no-frame-pointer-elim*' function attributes if generating llvm IR via
some other method) to take advantage of this optimization.
This change should be NFC when compiling via clang without
-fomit-frame-pointer.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, qcolombet, llvm-commits, danalbert, mcrosier, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17730
llvm-svn: 262495
Disable post-ra scheduler for perturbed tests to appease the bots and to
preserve the history of the tests.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15652
llvm-svn: 256158
SELECT_CC has the nasty property of having operands with unrelated
types. So if you do something like:
f32 = select_cc f16, f16, f32, f32, cc
You'd only look for the action for <select_cc, f32>, but never f16.
If the types are all legal, but the op isn't (as for f16 on AArch64,
or for f128 on x86_64/AArch64?), then you get into trouble.
For f128, we have softenSetCCOperands to handle this case.
Similarly, for f16, we can directly promote the CC operands.
llvm-svn: 253344
Now that we can properly promote mismatched FCOPYSIGNs (r244858), we
can mark the FP_ROUND on the result as truncating, to expose folding.
FCOPYSIGN doesn't change anything but the sign bit, so
(fp_round (fcopysign (fpext a), b))
is equivalent to (modulo the sign bit):
(fp_round (fpext a))
which is a no-op.
llvm-svn: 244862
We can lower them using our cool tricks if we fpext/fptrunc the second
input, like we do for f32/f64.
Follow-up to r243924, r243926, and r244858.
llvm-svn: 244860
We don't care about its type, and there's even a combine that'll fold
away the FP_EXTEND if we let it run. However, until it does, we'll have
something broken like:
(f32 (fp_extend (f64 v)))
Scalar f16 follow-up to r243924.
llvm-svn: 244858
Lower Intrinsic::aarch64_neon_fmin/fmax to fminnum/fmannum and match that instead. Minimal functional change:
- Extra tests added because coverage of scalar fminnm/fmaxnm instructions was nonexistant.
- f16 test updated because now we actually generate scalar fminnm/fmaxnm we no longer need to bail out to a libcall!
llvm-svn: 244595
C11 leaves the choice on whether round-to-integer operations set the inexact
flag implementation-defined. Darwin does expect it to be set, but this seems to
be against the intent of the IEEE document and slower to implement anyway. So
it should be opt-in.
llvm-svn: 242446
For the most common ones (such as fadd), we already did the promotion.
Do the same thing for all the others.
Currently, we'll just crash/assert on all these operations, as
there's no hardware or libcall support whatsoever.
f16 (half) is specified as an interchange - not arithmetic - format,
and is expected to be promoted to single-precision for arithmetic
operations.
While there, teach the legalizer about promoting some of the (mostly
floating-point) operations that we never needed before.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8648
See related discussion on the thread for: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8755
llvm-svn: 234550
Chad Rosier