This patch adds support for instrumenting masked loads and stores under
ASan, if they have a constant mask.
isInterestingMemoryAccess now supports returning a mask to be applied to
the loads, and instrumentMop will use it to generate additional checks.
Added tests for v4i32 v8i32, and v4p0i32 (~v4i64) for both loads and
stores (as well as a test to verify we don't add checks to non-constant
masks).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26230
llvm-svn: 287047
Lower a = b * C where C = (2^n + 1) * 2^m to
add w0, w0, w0, lsl n
lsl w0, w0, m
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D229245
llvm-svn: 287019
The wave barrier represents the discardable barrier. Its main purpose is to
carry convergent attribute, thus preventing illegal CFG optimizations. All lanes
in a wave come to convergence point simultaneously with SIMT, thus no special
instruction is needed in the ISA. The barrier is discarded during code generation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26585
llvm-svn: 287007
Also, fix the test params to use an attribute rather than a CPU model
and remove the AVX run because that does nothing but check for a 'v'
prefix in all of these tests.
llvm-svn: 287003
In RateRegister of existing LSR, if a formula contains a Reg which is a SCEVAddRecExpr,
and this SCEVAddRecExpr's loop is an outerloop, the formula will be marked as Loser
and dropped.
Suppose we have an IR that %for.body is outerloop and %for.body2 is innerloop. LSR only
handle inner loop now so only %for.body2 will be handled.
Using the logic above, formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) will be dropped
no matter what because reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) is a SCEVAddRecExpr type reg related
with outerloop. Only formula like
reg(%array) + 1*reg({{1,+, %size}<%for.body>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body2>) will be kept
because the SCEVAddRecExpr related with outerloop is folded into the initial value of the
SCEVAddRecExpr related with current loop.
But in some cases, we do need to share the basic induction variable
reg{0 ,+, 1}<%for.body2> among LSR Uses to reduce the final total number of induction
variables used by LSR, so we don't want to drop the formula like
reg(%array) + reg({1,+, %size}<%for.body>) + 1*reg({0,+,1}<%for.body2>) unconditionally.
From the existing comment, it tries to avoid considering multiple level loops at the same time.
However, existing LSR only handles innermost loop, so for any SCEVAddRecExpr with a loop other
than current loop, it is an invariant and will be simple to handle, and the formula doesn't have
to be dropped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26429
llvm-svn: 286999
Summary:
This fixes the runtime results produces by the fallback multiplication expansion introduced in r270720.
For tests I created a fuzz tester that compares the results with Boost.Multiprecision.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26628
llvm-svn: 286998
When both WidenIV::getWideRecurrence and WidenIV::getExtendedOperandRecurrence
return non-null but different WideAddRec, if getWideRecurrence is called
before getExtendedOperandRecurrence, we won't bother to call
getExtendedOperandRecurrence again. But As we know it is possible that after
SCEV folding, we cannot prove the legality using the SCEVAddRecExpr returned
by getWideRecurrence. Meanwhile if getExtendedOperandRecurrence returns non-null
WideAddRec, we know for sure that it is legal to do widening for current instruction.
So it is better to put getExtendedOperandRecurrence before getWideRecurrence, which
will increase the chance of successful widening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26059
llvm-svn: 286987
This patch helps avoids poor legalization of boolean vector results (e.g. 8f32 -> 8i1 -> 8i16) that feed into SINT_TO_FP by inserting an early SIGN_EXTEND and so help improve the truncation logic.
This is not necessary for AVX512 targets where boolean vectors are legal - AVX512 manages to lower ( sint_to_fp vXi1 ) into some form of ( select mask, 1.0f , 0.0f ) in most cases.
Fix for PR13248
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26583
llvm-svn: 286979
The register usage algorithm incorrectly treats instructions whose value is
not used within the loop (e.g. those that do not produce a value).
The algorithm first calculates the usages within the loop. It iterates over
the instructions in order, and records at which instruction index each use
ends (in fact, they're actually recorded against the next index, as this is
when we want to delete them from the open intervals).
The algorithm then iterates over the instructions again, adding each
instruction in turn to a list of open intervals. Instructions are then
removed from the list of open intervals when they occur in the list of uses
ended at the current index.
The problem is, instructions which are not used in the loop are skipped.
However, although they aren't used, the last use of a value may have been
recorded against that instruction index. In this case, the use is not deleted
from the open intervals, which may then bump up the estimated register usage.
This patch fixes the issue by simply moving the "is used" check after the loop
which erases the uses at the current index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26554
llvm-svn: 286969
This patch implements all the overloads for vec_xl_be and vec_xst_be. On BE,
they behaves exactly the same with vec_xl and vec_xst, therefore they are
simply implemented by defining a matching macro. On LE, they are implemented
by defining new builtins and intrinsics. For int/float/long long/double, it
is just a load (lxvw4x/lxvd2x) or store(stxvw4x/stxvd2x). For char/char/short,
we also need some extra shuffling before or after call the builtins to get the
desired BE order. For int128, simply call vec_xl or vec_xst.
llvm-svn: 286967
Summary:
Fix a case where the overflow value of type i1, which is legal on AVX512, was assigned to a VK1 register class.
We always want this value to be assigned to a GPR since the overflow return value is lowered to a SETO instruction.
Fixes pr30981.
Reviewers: mkuper, igorb, craig.topper, guyblank, qcolombet
Subscribers: qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26620
llvm-svn: 286958
This patch adds the Sched Machine Model for Cortex-R52.
Details of the pipeline and descriptions are in comments
in file ARMScheduleR52.td included in this patch.
Reviewers: rengolin, jmolloy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26500
llvm-svn: 286949
Summary:
Add basic functionality to support call lowering for X86.
Currently only supports functions which return void and take zero arguments.
Inspired by commit 286573.
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26593
llvm-svn: 286935
Permit specifying the match length (the `-n` or `--bytes` option). The
deprecated `-[length]` form is not supported as an option. This allows the
strings tool to display only the specified length strings rather than the
hardcoded default length of >= 4.
llvm-svn: 286914
Implement the Newton series for square root, its reciprocal and reciprocal
natively using the specialized instructions in AArch64 to perform each
series iteration.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26518
llvm-svn: 286907
This was causing us to create duplicate metadata on global variables.
Debug info test case by Adrian Prantl, additional test cases by me.
Fixes PR31012.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26622
llvm-svn: 286905
This adds support for TSan C++ exception handling, where we need to add extra calls to __tsan_func_exit when a function is exitted via exception mechanisms. Otherwise the shadow stack gets corrupted (leaked). This patch moves and enhances the existing implementation of EscapeEnumerator that finds all possible function exit points, and adds extra EH cleanup blocks where needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26177
llvm-svn: 286893
The philosophy of the error checking in libObject for Mach-O files
is that the constructor will check the load commands so for their
tables the offsets and sizes are properly contained in the file.
But there is no checking of the entries of any of the tables.
For the contents of the tables themselves the methods accessing
the contents of the entries return errors as needed. In some
cases this however makes it difficult or cumbersome to produce
a good error message which would include the tool name, file name,
archive member, and name of the architecture of a slice of a universal file
the error occurred in.
So idea is that there will be a method to check a table which can
be called up front before using it allowing a good error message
to be produced before a table is used. And if only verification of
the Mach-O file and its tables are wanted a new possible method
checkAllTables() could be added to call all of the methods to
check all the tables at some time when such methods exist.
The checkSymbolTable() is the first of such methods to check
one of the Mach-O file tables. This method initially will used in
llvm-objdump’s DisassembleMachO() routine before it gets the
section and symbol information. As if there are problems with
the symbol table currently the error is first encountered by the
bool operator() in the SymbolSorter() struct which passed to
std::sort(). In this case there is no context as to the file name
the symbol which results a poor error message:
LLVM ERROR: truncated or malformed object (bad string index: 22 for symbol at index 1)
with the added call to the checkSymbolTable() method the
error message includes the tool name and file name:
llvm-objdump: 'macho-invalid-symbol-strx': truncated or malformed object (bad string table index: 22 past the end of string table, for symbol at index 1)
llvm-svn: 286887
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
Fixed usage of std::sort so that we (hopefully) use instantiations that
actually exist in GCC 4.8.
llvm-svn: 286881
Summary:
Replace a splat of zeros to a vector store by scalar stores of WZR/XZR.
The load store optimizer pass will merge them to store pair stores.
This should be better than a movi to create the vector zero followed by
a vector store if the zero constant is not re-used, since one
instructions and one register live range will be removed.
For example, the final generated code should be:
stp xzr, xzr, [x0]
instead of:
movi v0.2d, #0
str q0, [x0]
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, MatzeB, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26561
llvm-svn: 286875
Summary:
We have always speculatively promoted all renamable local values
(except const non-address taken variables) for both the exporting
and importing module. We would then internalize them back based on
the ThinLink results if they weren't actually exported. This is
inefficient, and results in unnecessary renames. It also meant we
had to check the non-renamability of a value in the summary, which
was already checked during function importing analysis in the ThinLink.
Made renameModuleForThinLTO (which does the promotion/renaming) instead
use the index when exporting, to avoid unnecessary renames/promotions.
For importing modules, we can simply promoted all values as any local
we import by definition is exported and needs promotion.
This required changes to the method used by the FunctionImport pass
(only invoked from 'opt' for testing) and when invoked from llvm-link,
since neither does a ThinLink. We simply conservatively mark all locals
in the index as promoted, which preserves the current aggressive
promotion behavior.
I also needed to change an llvm-lto based test where we had previously
been aggressively promoting values that weren't importable (aliasees),
but now will not promote.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26467
llvm-svn: 286871
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
llvm-svn: 286866
Sanjay Patel