This patch fixes the z/OS build by using the first implementation of __remove_all since we don't have access to the openat() family of POSIX functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132948
This version is build without support for the experimental library but
the code still wants to link this function. Inlining the function solves
the issue.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132667
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
Trying to be generic didn't work properly because we had to special-case
some interface libraries that we didn't want in the linker script. Instead,
only look at the ABI and the unwinding libraries explicitly.
This should solve the issue reported by @dim in [1].
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/15-0-0-rc1-has-been-tagged/64174/22
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131037
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Spies: philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130905
With the goal of reusing that handler to do other things besides
handling assertions (such as terminating when an exception is thrown
under -fno-exceptions), the name `__libcpp_assertion_handler` doesn't
really make sense anymore.
Furthermore, I didn't want to use the name `__libcpp_abort_handler`,
since that would give the impression that the handler is called
whenever `std::abort()` is called, which is not the case at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130562
Instead of taking a fixed set of arguments, use variadics so that
we can pass arbitrary arguments to the handler. This is the first
step towards using the handler to handle other non-assertion-related
failures, like std::unreachable and an exception being thrown in
-fno-exceptions mode, which would improve user experience by including
additional information in crashes (right now, we call abort() without
additional information).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130507
In particular remove the ability to expel incomplete features from the
library at configure-time, since this can now be done through the
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL macro.
Also, never provide symbols related to incomplete features inside the
dylib, instead provide them in c++experimental.a (this changes the
symbols list, but not for any configuration that should have shipped).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128928
This caused build failures when building Clang and libc++ together on Mac:
fatal error: 'experimental/memory_resource' file not found
See the code review for details. Reverting until the problem and how to
solve it is better understood.
(Updates to some test files were not reverted, since they seemed
unrelated and were later updated by 340b48b267b96.)
> This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
> by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
> users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
> also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
> in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
> build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
> use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
>
> Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
> existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
> that would merely break users that might be relying on such
> content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
> should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
> of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
> counterpart.
>
> Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
> _LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
> that do not implement -funstable yet.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This reverts commit bb939931a1.
This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
that would merely break users that might be relying on such
content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
counterpart.
Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
that do not implement -funstable yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
Instead of trying to be clever and design our own locking primitive,
simply rely on the OS-provided implementation to do the right thing.
Indeed, manually yielding to the OS does not provide the necessary
information for it to make good prioritization decisions. For example,
if a thread with higher priority yields while waiting for a lock held
by a thread with lower priority but the system is contended, it is
possible for the thread with lower priority to not run until the higher
priority thread has yielded 16 times and goes for __libcpp_mutex_lock().
Once that happens, the OS can bump the priority of the thread that
currently holds the lock to unblock everyone. So instead, we might as
well give the system all the information from the start so it can make
appropriate decisions.
As a fly-by change, also increase the number of locks in the table.
The size increase is modest, but has the potential to half the amount
of contention on those locks.
rdar://93598606
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126882
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
This was noticed in the review of D125704. In that commit only the new
table has been adapted. This adapts the existing tables.
Note since libc++'s charconv is backported to C++11 it's not possible to
use inline constexpr variables. The were introduced in C++17.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126887
This removes the duplicated code from the dylib. Instead the dylib will
call the new functions in the header. Since this code is unneeded it's
removed from the unstable ABI.
Depends on D125704
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125761
The functions to_chars and from_chars should offer 128-bit support. This
is the first step to implement 128-bit version of to_chars. Before
implementing 128-bit support the current code will be polished.
This moves the code from the dylib to the header in prepartion of
P2291 "Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header"
Note some more cleanups will be done in follow-up commits
- Remove the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_TO_CHARS from to_chars. With all code
in the header the availablilty macro is no longer needed. This
requires enabling the unit tests for additional platforms.
- The code in the dylib can switch to using the header implementation.
This allows removing the code duplicated in the header and the dylib.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125704
Also, add a CI job that tests this configuration. The exact configuration
is that we build a shared libc++ and merge objects for the ABI library
and the unwinder library into it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125903
(In the case of libunwind, the cmake option is called
LIBUNWIND_HIDE_SYMBOLS, but it has the same effect as
LIBCXX_HERMETIC_STATIC_LIBRARY and
LIBCXXABI_HERMETIC_STATIC_LIBRARY.)
Previously, the same issue was dealt with by setting a project wide
define (_LIBUNWIND_HIDE_SYMBOLS,
_LIBCXXABI_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS and
_LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS) if only building a static
library. If building both static and shared at the same time, this
wasn't set, and the static library would contain dllexport directives.
The LIB*_HERMETIC_STATIC_LIBRARY and LIBUNWIND_HIDE_SYMBOLS cmake
options only apply the defines to the static library in the build,
even if building both static and shared at the same time.
(This could only be done use after the object libraries were
enabled, as a shared libcxx needs libcxxabi object files built
with dllexports included.)
This allows removing inelegant code for deciding how to build the
libcxxabi static library and a TODO comment that suggested that
users should need to start setting an option, which they shouldn't
need to. Finally, this gets rid of two XFAILs in tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125715
I think this notion of libc++abi's version was relevant a long time ago
on Apple platforms when we were using a Xcode project to build the library.
As part of moving Apple's build to CMake, D59489 made it possible to
specify the "ABI version" of libc++abi in use. However, it's not possible
to build libc++abi with that old ABI anymore and we don't need the ability
to link against that version from libc++ anymore.
Hence, we can clean this up and stop falsely pretending that libc++abi
has more than one ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125687
This is a variant of D116689 rebased on top of the new (proposed) ABI
refactoring in D120727. It should conserve the basic properties of the
original patch by @phosek, except it also allows cleaning up the merging
of libc++abi into libc++ from the libc++ side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125393
This patch overhauls how we pick up the ABI library. Instead of setting
ad-hoc flags, it creates interface targets that can be linked against by
the rest of the build, which is easier to follow and extend to support
new ABI libraries.
This is intended to be a NFC change, however there are some additional
simplifications and improvements we can make in the future that would
require a slight behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120727
There are many more instances of this pattern, but I chose to limit this change to .rst files (docs), anything in libcxx/include, and string literals. These have the highest chance of being seen by end users.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante, martong, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124708
Detected on many lld tests with -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor.
Also https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast after D122869 will report a lot of them.
Threads may outlive static variables. Even if ~__thread_specific_ptr() does nothing, lifetime of members ends with ~ and accessing the value is UB https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.life#1
```
==9214==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x557e1cec4539 in __libcpp_tls_set ../include/c++/v1/__threading_support:428:12
#1 0x557e1cec4539 in set_pointer ../include/c++/v1/thread:196:5
#2 0x557e1cec4539 in void* std::__msan::__thread_proxy<
std::__msan::tuple<...>, llvm::parallel::detail::(anonymous namespace)::ThreadPoolExecutor::ThreadPoolExecutor(llvm::ThreadPoolStrategy)::'lambda'()::operator()() const::'lambda'()> >(void*) ../include/c++/v1/thread:285:27
Memory was marked as uninitialized
#0 0x557e10a0759d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:940:5
#1 0x557e1d8c478d in std::__msan::__thread_specific_ptr<std::__msan::__thread_struct>::~__thread_specific_ptr() libcxx/include/thread:188:1
#2 0x557e10a07dc0 in MSanCxaAtExitWrapper(void*) compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1151:3
```
The test needs D123979 or -fsanitize-memory-param-retval enabled by default.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122864
When we build the library with the stable ABI, we need to include some
functions in the dylib that were made inline in later versions of the
library (to avoid breaking code that might be relying on those symbols).
However, those methods were made non-inline whenever we'd be building
the library, which means that all translation units would end up using
the old out-of-line definition of these methods, as opposed to the new
inlined version. This patch makes it so that only the translation units
that actually define the out-of-line methods use the old definition,
opening up potential optimization opportunities in other translation
units.
This should solve some of the issues encountered in D65667.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123519
This patch addresses a clash with the PS register from Xtensa
defined in the <specreg.h> header file, which is commonly included in
OS implementation.
Issue identified while building libc++ port for Apache NuttX, targeting
Xtensa-based chips (e.g. Espressif's ESP32).
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Henrique Nihei <gustavo.nihei@espressif.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122479
I audited all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT to make sure that we only used it
for "basic assertions", i.e. assertions with constant-time conditions.
I also audited all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT to make sure we used it
only for debug-mode assertions, and in one case had to change for
_LIBCPP_ASSERT instead.
As a fly-by, I also changed a couple of tests against nullptr or 0 to
be more explicit.
After this patch, all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT should be with constant-time
conditions, and all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT should be with conditions
that we only want to check when the debug mode is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122395
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
According to Linux documentation (see e.g. https://linux.die.net/man/3/closedir):
> A successful call to `closedir()` also closes the underlying file
> descriptor associated with `dirp`.
Thus, calling `close()` after a successful call to `closedir()` is at
best redundant. Worse, should a different thread open a file in-between
the calls to `closedir()` and `close()` and get the same file descriptor,
the call to `close()` might actually close a different file than was
intended.
rdar://89251874
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120453
According to POSIX.1 (and Glibc docs, and Microsoft docs), the wctob
function returns EOF on error, not WEOF. (And wctob_l should consequently
do the same.)
The previous misconception about what this function returns on errors
seems to stem from incorrect documentation in macOS, stemming from BSD
docs with the same issue. The corresponding documentation bug in FreeBSD
was fixed in 2012 in
945aab9099,
but it hasn't been fixed for macOS yet.
The issue seems to only be a documentation issue; the implementation
on macOS actually does use EOF, not WEOF:
https://opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-1439.40.11/locale/FreeBSD/wctob.c.auto.html
On most Unices, EOF and WEOF are the same value, but on Windows,
EOF is -1, while WEOF is (unsigned short)0xFFFF. By fixing this,
two tests start passing on Windows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120088
This fixes instances of the newly added `-Wunqualified-std-cast-call`.
(Commit 7853371146 removed unqualified `move` from the tests,
but these unqualified `move`s remained undetected in the actual headers.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120509
Muiez Ahmed