This removes a lot of boilerplate code.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128081
For some reason `operator""s(const char8_t*, size_t)` was marked `noexcept`. Remove it and add regression tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, huixie90, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132340
This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.
The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.
In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.
Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687, c36870c8e7, a83f4b9cda, 1458458b55, 2e2f3158c6,
and 489637e66d. This should cover almost all the includes that had
been removed since LLVM 14 and that would contribute to breaking user
code when releasing LLVM 15.
It is possible to disable the inclusion of these headers by defining
_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES. The intent is that vendors will
enable that macro and start fixing downstream issues immediately. We
can then remove the macro (and the transitive includes) by default in
a future release. That way, we will break users only once by removing
transitive includes in bulk instead of doing it bit by bit a every
release, which is more disruptive for users.
Note 1: The set of headers to re-add was found by re-generating the
transitive include test on a checkout of release/14.x, which
provided the list of all transitive includes we used to provide.
Note 2: Several includes of <vector>, <optional>, <array> and <unordered_map>
have been added in this commit. These transitive inclusions were
added when we implemented boyer_moore_searcher in <functional>.
Note 3: This is a best effort patch to try and resolve downstream breakage
caused since branching LLVM 14. I wasn't able to perfectly mirror
transitive includes in LLVM 14 for a few headers, so I added a
release note explaining it. To summarize, adding boyer_moore_searcher
created a bunch of circular dependencies, so we have to break
backwards compatibility in a few cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128661
Summary:
Patch D123580 changed to use bit fields for strings in long and short mode. As a result, this changes the layout of these strings on AIX because bit fields on AIX are 4 bytes, which breaks the ABI compatibility with earlier strings before the change on AIX. This patch uses the attribute 'packed' and anonymous structure to make string layout compatible. This patch will also make test cases alignof.compile.pass.cpp and sizeof.compile.pass.cpp introduced in D127672 pass on AIX.
Reviewed by: philnik, Mordante, hubert.reinterpretcast, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128285
This removes all "TODO: remove these headers" comments from our headers.
Note there seem to be more headers that can be removed, that will be
done in separate commits.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127592
D125496 changed the string layout on windows. Change `__is_long_` and `__size_` back to using `unsigned char` to fix the issue.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, ayzhao
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127566
The flexibility around extern template instantiation declarations in
libc++ result in a very complicated model, especially when support for
slightly different configurations (like the debug mode or assertions
in the dylib) are taken into account. That results in unexpected bugs
like http://llvm.org/PR50534 (and there have been multiple similar
bugs in the past, notably around the debug mode).
This patch gets rid of the _LIBCPP_DISABLE_EXTERN_TEMPLATE knob, which
I don't think is fundamental. Indeed, the motivation for that knob was to
avoid taking a dependency on the library, however that can be done better
by linking against the static library instead. And in fact, some parts of
the headers will always depend on things defined in the library, which
defeats the original goal of _LIBCPP_DISABLE_EXTERN_TEMPLATE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103960
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
Instead of providing two different constructors for iterators that
support the debug mode, provide a single constructor but leave the
container parameter unused when the debug mode is not enabled.
This allows simplifying all the call sites to unconditionally pass
the container, which removes a bunch of duplication in the container's
implementation.
Note that this patch does add some complexity to std::span, however
that is only because std::span has the ability to use raw pointers
as iterators instead of __wrap_iter. In retrospect, I believe it was
a mistake to provide that capability, and so it will be removed in a
future patch, along with the complexity added by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126993
This simplifies the string structs a bit more and the normal layout should not contain any undefined behaviour anymore. I don't think there is a way to achieve this in the alternate string mode without breaking the ABI.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125496
Replace all the instances of `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` with `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` and `_VSTD` with `std`.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124662
This makes the code a bit simpler and (I think) removes the undefined behaviour from the normal string layout.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: labath, dblaikie, JDevlieghere, krytarowski, jgorbe, jingham, saugustine, arichardson, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123580
Instead of writing every character directly into the container by using
a `back_insert_iterator` the data is buffered in an `array`. This buffer
is then inserted to the container by calling its `insert` member function.
Since there's no guarantee every container's `insert` behaves properly
containers need to opt-in to this behaviour. The appropriate standard
containers opt-in to this behaviour.
This change improves the performance of the format functions that use a
`back_insert_iterator`.
Depends on D110495
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110497
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
`__addr_in_range` is a non-constexpr function, so we can't call it during constant evaluation.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, miscco
Spies: miscco, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119633
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
Also, fix the actual code so that the test would pass if we fixed the
issue that the method is instantiated in the dylib, and hence the debug
assertion will never fire except if the debug mode is enabled when the
dylib is being compiled.
Nikolas Klauser