We use CXX mangler to generate unique identifier for external C++ struct,
union, class and enum. Types with unique identifier are added to retained
types by DIBuilder.
Testing cases are updated to reflect the unique identifier generated for types.
The order of MDNodes is changed because of retained types and testing cases
are updated accordingly.
Testing case debug-info-uuid.cpp now emits error with Itanium mangler, since
uuid is not yet handled in Itanium mangler. And it will check for the error
message.
llvm-svn: 189622
We had further discussions on how to retain types, whether to do it in front end
or in DIBuilder. And we agree to do it in DIBuilder so front ends
generating unique identifier do not need to worry about retaining them.
llvm-svn: 189609
We use CXX mangler to generate unique identifier for external C++ struct,
union, class and enum. Types with unique identifier are added to RetainedTypes
to make sure they are treated as used even when all uses are replaced with
the identifiers.
A single type can be added to RetainedTypes multiple times. For example, both
createForwardDecl and createLimitedType can add the same type to RetainedTypes.
A set is used to avoid duplication when updating AllRetainTypes in DIBuilder.
Testing cases are updated to reflect the unique identifier generated for types.
The order of MDNodes is changed because of retained types and testing cases
are updated accordingly.
Testing case debug-info-uuid.cpp now emits error with Itanium mangler, since
uuid is not yet handled in Itanium mangler.
We choose to update RetainedTypes in clang, then at finalize(), we update
AllRetainTypes in DIBuilder. The other choice is to update AllRetainTypes
in DIBuilder when creating a DICompositeType with unique identifier. This
option requires using ValueHandle for AllRetainTypes in DIBuilder since
the created DICompositeType can be modified later on by setContainingType etc.
llvm-svn: 189600
There's still a problem here - since we're not appropriately using the
signedness/range of the enum to chooset the encoding and emission of
enumerators, but GCC has some bugs around this too so I assume that's
not /such/ a high priority though I may get to it soon out of
completeness.
llvm-svn: 184695
Hans Wennborg