It caused PR27275: "ARM: Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register"
Also reverting the following commits that were landed on top:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
llvm-svn: 265790
This re-commits r265535 which was reverted in r265541 because it
broke the windows bots. The problem was that we had a PointerIntPair
which took a pointer to a struct allocated with new. The problem
was that new doesn't provide sufficient alignment guarantees.
This pattern was already present before r265535 and it just happened
to work. To fix this, we now separate the PointerToIntPair from the
ExitNotTakenInfo struct into a pointer and a bool.
Original commit message:
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
llvm-svn: 265786
This reverts commit r265765, reapplying r265759 after changing a call from
LocalAsMetadata::get to ValueAsMetadata::get (and adding a unit test). When a
local value is mapped to a constant (like "i32 %a" => "i32 7"), the new debug
intrinsic operand may no longer be pointing at a local.
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_build/19020/
The previous coommit message follows:
--
This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).
This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy. In particular:
- MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
- MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.
- MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all. (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
loss of generality.)
r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals. This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:
define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
%x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
}
If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.
I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.
As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset. Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.
Original commit message:
ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values
Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.
- Don't memoize them.
- Return nullptr if they are missing.
This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
llvm-svn: 265768
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
llvm-svn: 265762
This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).
This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy. In particular:
- MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
- MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.
- MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all. (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
loss of generality.)
r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals. This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:
define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
%x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
}
If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.
I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.
As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset. Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.
Original commit message:
ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values
Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.
- Don't memoize them.
- Return nullptr if they are missing.
This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
llvm-svn: 265759
Now, recordRegBankForType records only the first register bank that
covers a type instead of the last. This behavior can, nevertheless, be
override with the additional Force parameter to force the update.
llvm-svn: 265741
TUs in each unit refer to the unit they are in, if the unit is moved
this reference is invalidated & things break.
No test case because UB isn't testable - ASan would likely catch this on
a large enough test case (just needs to have enough TUs that a
reallocation of the vector would occur) but didn't seem worthwhile. Up
for debate/revisiting if anyone feels strongly.
llvm-svn: 265740
specific type.
This will be used to find the default mapping of the instruction.
Also, this information is recorded, instead of computed, because it is
expensive from a type to know which register bank maps it.
Indeed, we need to iterate through all the register classes of all the
register banks to find the one that maps the given type.
llvm-svn: 265736
iterate over register class bitmask.
Thanks to this helper class, it would not require for each user of the
register classes bitmask to actually know how they are represents.
Moreover, it will make the code much easier to read.
llvm-svn: 265730
from a register.
On top of duplicating the logic, it was buggy! It would assert on
physical registers, since MachineRegisterInfo does not have any
information regarding register classes/banks for them.
llvm-svn: 265727
The pass walk through the machine function and assign the register banks
using the default mapping. In other words, there is no attempt to reduce
cross register copies.
llvm-svn: 265707
the mapping of an instruction on register bank.
For most instructions, it is possible to guess the mapping of the
instruciton by using the encoding constraints.
It remains instructions without encoding constraints.
For copy-like instructions, we try to propagate the information we get
from the other operands. Otherwise, the target has to give this
information.
llvm-svn: 265703
helper class.
The default constructor creates invalid (isValid() == false) instances
and may be used to communicate that a mapping was not found.
llvm-svn: 265699
A virtual register may have either a register bank or a register class.
This is represented by a PointerUnion between the related classes.
Typically, a virtual register went through the following states
regarding register class and register bank:
1. Creation: None is set. Virtual registers are fully generic.
2. Register bank assignment: Register bank is set. Virtual registers
live into a register bank, but we do not know the constraints they need
to fulfil.
3. Instruction selection: Register class is set. Virtual registers are
bound by encoding constraints.
To map these states to GlobalISel, the IRTranslator implements #1,
RegBankSelect #2, and Select #3.
llvm-svn: 265696
Follow-up to D18775 and related clang change. AtomicOrdering is a lattice, 'stronger' is the right thing to do, direct comparison is fraught with peril.
llvm-svn: 265685
This patch add support for GCC attribute((ifunc("resolver"))) for
targets that use ELF as object file format. In general ifunc is a
special kind of function alias with type @gnu_indirect_function. Patch
for Clang http://reviews.llvm.org/D15524
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15525
llvm-svn: 265667
Remove the assertion that disallowed the combination, since
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should have no effect on globals. As it happens,
RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues asserted in MapValue(Constant*,...), so I
also changed a cast to a cast_or_null to get my test passing.
llvm-svn: 265633
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.
- Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
- Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
- Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
the intent of the flag.
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock. Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).
When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.
This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.
llvm-svn: 265628
Produce the first specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file describing
the problem instead of the generic message for object_error::parse_failed of
"Invalid data was encountered while parsing the file”. Many more good error
messages will follow after this first one.
This is built on Lang Hames’ great work of adding the ’Error' class for
structured error handling and threading Error through MachOObjectFile
construction. And making createMachOObjectFile return Expected<...> .
So to to get the error to the llvm-obdump tool, I changed the stack of
these methods to also return Expected<...> :
object::ObjectFile::createObjectFile()
object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile()
object::createBinary()
Then finally in ParseInputMachO() in MachODump.cpp the error can
be reported and the specific error message can be printed in llvm-objdump
and can be seen in the existing test case for the existing malformed binary
but with the updated error message.
Converting these interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now use of
errorToErrorCode() and errorOrToExpected() are used where the callers
are yet to be converted.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(ObjOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there is one fix also needed to lld/COFF/InputFiles.cpp that goes along
with this that I will commit right after this. So expect lld not to built
after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 265606
This will be used by the register bank select pass to assign register banks
for generic virtual registers.
This was originally committed as r265573 but broke at least one windows bot.
The problem with the windows bot was that it was using a copy constructor for
the InstructionMappings class and could not synthesize it. Actually, the fact
that this class is not copy constructable is expected and the compiler should
use the move assignment constructor. Marking the problematic assignment
explicitly as using the move constructor has its own problems.
Indeed, with recent clang we get a warning that we may prevent the elision of
the copy by the compiler. A proper fix for both compilers would be to change the
API of getPossibleInstrMapping to take a InstructionMappings as input/output
parameter. This does not feel natural and since GISel is not used on windows
yet, I chose to workaround the problem by not compiling the problematic code on
windows.
llvm-svn: 265604
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
This makes it possible to distinguish between mesa shaders
and other kernels even in the presence of compute shaders.
Patch By: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18559
llvm-svn: 265589
instruction on a register bank. This will be used by the register bank select
pass to assign register banks for generic virtual registers." and the follow-on
commits while I find out a way to fix the win7 bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/19882
This reverts commit r265578, r265581, r265584, and r265585.
llvm-svn: 265587
helper class.
The default constructor creates invalid (isValid() == false) instances
and may be used to communicate that a mapping was not found.
llvm-svn: 265581
Use a DenseSet instead of a DenseMap for constants in LLVMContextImpl.
Last time I looked at this was some time before r223588, when
DenseSet<V> had no advantage over DenseMap<V,char>. After r223588,
there's a 50% memory savings.
This is all mechanical. There were little bits of missing API from
DenseSet so I added the trivial implementations:
- iterator::operator++(int)
- template <class LookupKeyT> insert_as(ValueTy, LookupKeyT)
There should be no functionality change, just reduced memory consumption
(this wasn't on a profile or anything; just a cleanup I stumbled on).
llvm-svn: 265577
1. Add FullUnrollMaxCount option that works like MaxCount, but also limits
the unroll count for fully unrolled loops. So if a loop has an iteration
count over this, it won't fully unroll.
2. Add CLI options for MaxCount and the new option, so they can be tested
(plus a test).
3. Make partial unrolling obey MaxCount.
An example use-case (the out of tree one this is originally designed for) is
a target’s TTI can analyze a loop and decide on a max unroll count separate
from the size threshold, e.g. based on register pressure, then constrain
LoopUnroll to not exceed that, regardless of the size of the unrolled loop.
llvm-svn: 265562
The method checks that the value is fully defined accross the different partial
mappings and that the partial mappings are compatible between each other.
llvm-svn: 265556
Hans Wennborg