Two or more identical assumes are occasionally next to each other in a
basic block.
While our generic machinery will turn a redundant assume into a no-op,
it is not super cheap.
We can perform a simpler check to achieve the same result for this case.
llvm-svn: 265801
InstCombine cannot effectively remove redundant assumptions without them
registered in the assumption cache. The vectorizer can create identical
assumptions but doesn't register them with the cache, resulting in
slower compile times because InstCombine tries to reason about a lot
more assumptions.
Fix this by registering the cloned assumptions.
llvm-svn: 265800
virtual registers.
Generic virtual registers:
- May not have a register class
- May not have a register bank
- If they do not have a register class they must have a size
- If they have a register bank, the size of the register bank must be
greater or equal to the size of the virtual register (basically check
that the virtual register will fit into that register class)
llvm-svn: 265798
For now, we put the register bank in the Class field since a register
may only have one of those at a given time. The downside of that
representation is that if a register class and a register bank have the
same name, we will not be able to distinguish them.
llvm-svn: 265796
Added ISelDAGToDAG functions to enable selection of the smlawb, smlawt,
smulwb and smulwt instructions for the ARM backend. Also updated the smul
CodeGen test and removed the smulw one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18892
llvm-svn: 265793
It caused PR27275: "ARM: Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register"
Also reverting the following commits that were landed on top:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
llvm-svn: 265790
This re-commits r265535 which was reverted in r265541 because it
broke the windows bots. The problem was that we had a PointerIntPair
which took a pointer to a struct allocated with new. The problem
was that new doesn't provide sufficient alignment guarantees.
This pattern was already present before r265535 and it just happened
to work. To fix this, we now separate the PointerToIntPair from the
ExitNotTakenInfo struct into a pointer and a bool.
Original commit message:
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
llvm-svn: 265786
As discussed on D18441 - auto brief is used so we don't need /brief, we don't need to include the function name and added some missing descriptions.
llvm-svn: 265785
This is the same change on PPC64 as r255821 on AArch64. I have even borrowed
his commit message.
The access function has a short entry and a short exit, the initialization
block is only run the first time. To improve the performance, we want to
have a short frame at the entry and exit.
We explicitly handle most of the CSRs via copies. Only the CSRs that are not
handled via copies will be in CSR_SaveList.
Frame lowering and prologue/epilogue insertion will generate a short frame
in the entry and exit according to CSR_SaveList. The majority of the CSRs will
be handled by register allcoator. Register allocator will try to spill and
reload them in the initialization block.
We add CSRsViaCopy, it will be explicitly handled during lowering.
1> we first set FunctionLoweringInfo->SplitCSR if conditions are met (the target
supports it for the given machine function and the function has only return
exits). We also call TLI->initializeSplitCSR to perform initialization.
2> we call TLI->insertCopiesSplitCSR to insert copies from CSRsViaCopy to
virtual registers at beginning of the entry block and copies from virtual
registers to CSRsViaCopy at beginning of the exit blocks.
3> we also need to make sure the explicit copies will not be eliminated.
Author: Tom Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: hfinkel kbarton cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17533
llvm-svn: 265781
It seems that llc cannot be called used in assembler tests so test that
checks asm for particular target needs to be moved to codegen.
llvm-svn: 265770
This reverts commit r265765, reapplying r265759 after changing a call from
LocalAsMetadata::get to ValueAsMetadata::get (and adding a unit test). When a
local value is mapped to a constant (like "i32 %a" => "i32 7"), the new debug
intrinsic operand may no longer be pointing at a local.
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_build/19020/
The previous coommit message follows:
--
This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).
This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy. In particular:
- MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
- MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.
- MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all. (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
loss of generality.)
r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals. This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:
define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
%x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
}
If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.
I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.
As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset. Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.
Original commit message:
ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values
Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.
- Don't memoize them.
- Return nullptr if they are missing.
This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
llvm-svn: 265768
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
llvm-svn: 265762
This patch closes a gap in the DWARF backend that caused LLVM to drop
debug info for floating point variables that were constant for part of
their scope. Floating point constants are emitted as one or more
DW_OP_constu joined via DW_OP_piece.
This fixes a regression caught by the LLDB testsuite that I introduced
in r262247 when we stopped blindly expanding the range of singular
DBG_VALUEs to span the entire scope and started to emit location lists
with accurate ranges instead.
Also deletes a now-impossible testcase (debug-loc-empty-entries).
<rdar://problem/25448338>
llvm-svn: 265760
This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).
This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy. In particular:
- MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
- MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.
- MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all. (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
loss of generality.)
r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals. This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:
define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
%x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
}
If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.
I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.
As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset. Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.
Original commit message:
ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values
Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.
- Don't memoize them.
- Return nullptr if they are missing.
This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.
llvm-svn: 265759
Now, recordRegBankForType records only the first register bank that
covers a type instead of the last. This behavior can, nevertheless, be
override with the additional Force parameter to force the update.
llvm-svn: 265741
TUs in each unit refer to the unit they are in, if the unit is moved
this reference is invalidated & things break.
No test case because UB isn't testable - ASan would likely catch this on
a large enough test case (just needs to have enough TUs that a
reallocation of the vector would occur) but didn't seem worthwhile. Up
for debate/revisiting if anyone feels strongly.
llvm-svn: 265740
specific type.
This will be used to find the default mapping of the instruction.
Also, this information is recorded, instead of computed, because it is
expensive from a type to know which register bank maps it.
Indeed, we need to iterate through all the register classes of all the
register banks to find the one that maps the given type.
llvm-svn: 265736
iterate over register class bitmask.
Thanks to this helper class, it would not require for each user of the
register classes bitmask to actually know how they are represents.
Moreover, it will make the code much easier to read.
llvm-svn: 265730
from a register.
On top of duplicating the logic, it was buggy! It would assert on
physical registers, since MachineRegisterInfo does not have any
information regarding register classes/banks for them.
llvm-svn: 265727
Summary:
EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate.
EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally.
Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625
llvm-svn: 265726
Quentin Colombet