Commit Graph

329 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper 220fd33522 [X86] Add AES to KNL CPUs to match clang.
I believe this was lost from KNL when AES was pushed from Westmere to Skylake recently. KNL used to inherit from IVB.

llvm-svn: 345519
2018-10-29 18:17:01 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Craig Topper c10de9a37a [X86] Remove ProcIntelKNL and replace with a SlowPMADDWD flag to use in the one place it was checked.
llvm-svn: 345286
2018-10-25 17:29:00 +00:00
Craig Topper 5d787ac4be [X86] Remove some uarch tuning flags from KNL that look to have been inherited from SNB/IVB incorrectly
KNL is based on a modified Silvermont core so I don't think these features apply. I think the LEA flag is probably also wrong, but I'm less sure as I barely understand the 3 LEA flags we have currently.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53671

llvm-svn: 345285
2018-10-25 17:28:57 +00:00
Craig Topper 7bb8c2e6e5 [X86] Explicitly list all KNL features of inheriting from IVB. NFC
I'm not sure all the microarchitectural tuning flags that have been added to IVBFeatures are relevant for KNL. Separating will allow us to see and audit them. There might even be some simplification opportunities in the Sandy Bridge through Icelake inheritance line without KNL using the same chain.

llvm-svn: 345183
2018-10-24 19:24:44 +00:00
Craig Topper 96889b8b96 [X86] Remove unused entries from the X86ProcFamily enum. Add a note to discourage creation of new enum entries.
As we've learned multiple times, a coarse grained enum like this is not scalable and we should be migrating away from it.

llvm-svn: 344972
2018-10-22 23:14:55 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e28c8ecd72 [x86] add and use fast horizontal vector math subtarget feature
This is the planned follow-up to D52997. Here we are reducing horizontal vector math codegen 
by default. AMD Jaguar (btver2) should have no difference with this patch because it has 
fast-hops. (If we want to set that bit for other CPUs, let me know.)

The code changes are small, but there are many test diffs. For files that are specifically 
testing for hops, I added RUNs to distinguish fast/slow, so we can see the consequences 
side-by-side. For files that are primarily concerned with codegen other than hops, I just 
updated the CHECK lines to reflect the new default codegen.

To recap the recent horizontal op story:

1. Before rL343727, we were producing hops for all subtargets for a variety of patterns. 
   Hops were likely not optimal for all targets though.
2. The IR improvement in r343727 exposed a hole in the backend hop pattern matching, so 
   we reduced hop codegen for all subtargets. That was bad for Jaguar (PR39195).
3. We restored the hop codegen for all targets with rL344141. Good for Jaguar, but 
   probably bad for other CPUs.
4. This patch allows us to distinguish when we want to produce hops, so everyone can be 
   happy. I'm not sure if we have the best predicate here, but the intent is to undo the 
   extra hop-iness that was enabled by r344141.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53095

llvm-svn: 344361
2018-10-12 16:41:02 +00:00
Craig Topper 02c62aa58a [X86] Remove FeatureRTM from Skylake processor list
Summary:
There are a LOT of Skylakes and later without TSX-NI. Examples:
- SKL: https://ark.intel.com/products/136863/Intel-Core-i3-8121U-Processor-4M-Cache-up-to-3-20-GHz-
- KBL: https://ark.intel.com/products/97540/Intel-Core-i7-7560U-Processor-4M-Cache-up-to-3-80-GHz-
- KBL-R: https://ark.intel.com/products/149091/Intel-Core-i7-8565U-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4-60-GHz-
- CNL: https://ark.intel.com/products/136863/Intel-Core-i3-8121U-Processor-4M-Cache-up-to-3_20-GHz

This feature seems to be present only on high-end desktop and server
chips (I can't find any SKX without). This commit leaves it disabled
for all processors, but can be re-enabled for specific builds with
-mrtm.

Patch by Thiago Macieira

Reviewers: erichkeane, craig.topper

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53041

llvm-svn: 344116
2018-10-10 07:43:35 +00:00
Rong Xu 3d2efdfdea Recommit r343993: [X86] condition branches folding for three-way conditional codes
Fix the memory issue exposed by sanitizer.

llvm-svn: 344085
2018-10-09 22:03:40 +00:00
Rong Xu 47fd015163 [X86] Revert r343993 condition branches folding for three-way conditional codes
Some buildbots failed.

llvm-svn: 343998
2018-10-08 22:08:43 +00:00
Rong Xu 67b1b328f7 [X86] condition branches folding for three-way conditional codes
This patch implements a pass that optimizes condition branches on x86 by
taking advantage of the three-way conditional code generated by compare
instructions.

Currently, it tries to hoisting EQ and NE conditional branch to a dominant
conditional branch condition where the same EQ/NE conditional code is
computed. An example:
bb_0:
  cmp %0, 19
  jg bb_1
  jmp bb_2
bb_1:
  cmp %0, 40
  jg bb_3
  jmp bb_4
bb_4:
  cmp %0, 20
  je bb_5
  jmp bb_6
Here we could combine the two compares in bb_0 and bb_4 and have the
following code:

bb_0:
  cmp %0, 20
  jg bb_1
  jl bb_2
  jmp bb_5
bb_1:
  cmp %0, 40
  jg bb_3
  jmp bb_6

For the case of %0 == 20 (bb_5), we eliminate two jumps, and the control height
for bb_6 is also reduced. bb_4 is gone after the optimization.

This optimization is motivated by the branch pattern generated by the switch
lowering: we always have pivot-1 compare for the inner nodes and we do a pivot
compare again the leaf (like above pattern).

This pass currently is enabled on Intel's Sandybridge and later arches. Some
reviewers pointed out that on some arches (like AMD Jaguar), this pass may
increase branch density to the point where it hurts the performance of the
branch predictor.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46662

llvm-svn: 343993
2018-10-08 18:52:39 +00:00
Craig Topper 1709829fed [X86] Disable BMI BEXTR in X86DAGToDAGISel::matchBEXTRFromAnd unless we're on compiling for a CPU with single uop BEXTR
Summary:
This function turns (X >> C1) & C2 into a BMI BEXTR or TBM BEXTRI instruction. For BMI BEXTR we have to materialize an immediate into a register to feed to the BEXTR instruction.

The BMI BEXTR instruction is 2 uops on Intel CPUs. It looks like on SKL its one port 0/6 uop and one port 1/5 uop. Despite what Agner's tables say. I know one of the uops is a regular shift uop so it would have to go through the port 0/6 shifter unit. So that's the same or worse execution wise than the shift+and which is one 0/6 uop and one 0/1/5/6 uop. The move immediate into register is an additional 0/1/5/6 uop.

For now I've limited this transform to AMD CPUs which have a single uop BEXTR. If may also might make sense if we can fold a load or if the and immediate is larger than 32-bits and can't be encoded as a sign extended 32-bit value or if LICM or CSE can hoist the move immediate and share it. But we'd need to look more carefully at that. In the regression I looked at it doesn't look load folding or large immediates were occurring so the regression isn't caused by the loss of those. So we could try to be smarter here if we find a compelling case.

Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb, RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52570

llvm-svn: 343399
2018-09-30 03:01:46 +00:00
Erich Keane 911ddd6db5 Move FeatureAES from SLM, WSM and SNB to GLM and SKL
Complements https://reviews.llvm.org/D51510 and matches
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01940.html

GoldmontProc already has FeatureAES.

Patch By: thiagomacieira

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51565

llvm-svn: 341861
2018-09-10 21:12:19 +00:00
Craig Topper b7b353be60 [X86] Make Feature64Bit useful
We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit.

I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds.

The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231

llvm-svn: 341022
2018-08-30 06:01:05 +00:00
Craig Topper 128915f4ae [X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1
Summary:
Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1.

This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising.

This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools.

This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway.

For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV.

Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228

llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-26 18:29:33 +00:00
Craig Topper b68a78b9ac [X86] Add FeatureCMOV to athlon and athlon-tbird cpus.
Summary: This matches gcc and one cpuid dump I found online. Given that these are considered 7th generation x86 CPU it seems likely they support cmov since cmov was added by Intel in their 6th generation.

Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51264

llvm-svn: 340706
2018-08-26 18:29:27 +00:00
Chandler Carruth ae0cafece8 [x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate
subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches.

This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when
using speculative load hardening.

I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to
seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so
far.

The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the
old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will
cause.

This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This
always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable --
you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are
getting retpolines.

I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an
LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in
Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and
instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in
order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code
so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk
continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this
I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that
in this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150

llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 06:06:38 +00:00
Andrea Di Biagio b6022aa8d9 [X86][BtVer2] correctly model the latency/throughput of LEA instructions.
This patch fixes the latency/throughput of LEA instructions in the BtVer2
scheduling model.

On Jaguar, A 3-operands LEA has a latency of 2cy, and a reciprocal throughput of
1. That is because it uses one cycle of SAGU followed by 1cy of ALU1.  An LEA
with a "Scale" operand is also slow, and it has the same latency profile as the
3-operands LEA. An LEA16r has a latency of 3cy, and a throughput of 0.5 (i.e.
RThrouhgput of 2.0).

This patch adds a new TIIPredicate named IsThreeOperandsLEAFn to X86Schedule.td.
The tablegen backend (for instruction-info) expands that definition into this
(file X86GenInstrInfo.inc):
```
static bool isThreeOperandsLEA(const MachineInstr &MI) {
  return (
    (
      MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA32r
      || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64r
      || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r
      || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA16r
    )
    && MI.getOperand(1).isReg()
    && MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != 0
    && MI.getOperand(3).isReg()
    && MI.getOperand(3).getReg() != 0
    && (
      (
        MI.getOperand(4).isImm()
        && MI.getOperand(4).getImm() != 0
      )
      || (MI.getOperand(4).isGlobal())
    )
  );
}
```

A similar method is generated in the X86_MC namespace, and included into
X86MCTargetDesc.cpp (the declaration lives in X86MCTargetDesc.h).

Back to the BtVer2 scheduling model:
A new scheduling predicate named JSlowLEAPredicate now checks if either the
instruction is a three-operands LEA, or it is an LEA with a Scale value
different than 1.
A variant scheduling class uses that new predicate to correctly select the
appropriate latency profile.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49436

llvm-svn: 337469
2018-07-19 16:42:15 +00:00
Gabor Buella d2f1ab1b10 [x86] invpcid LLVM intrinsic
Re-add the feature flag for invpcid, which was removed in r294561.
Add an intrinsic, which always uses a 32 bit integer as first argument,
while the instruction actually uses a 64 bit register in 64 bit mode
for the INVPCID_TYPE argument.

Reviewers: craig.topper

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47141

llvm-svn: 333255
2018-05-25 06:32:05 +00:00
Alexander Ivchenko 5c54742da4 [X86][CET] Changing -fcf-protection behavior to comply with gcc (LLVM part)
This patch aims to match the changes introduced in gcc by
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-04/msg00534.html. The
IBT feature definition is removed, with the IBT instructions
being freely available on all X86 targets. The shadow stack
instructions are also being made freely available, and the
use of all these CET instructions is controlled by the module
flags derived from the -fcf-protection clang option. The hasSHSTK
option remains since clang uses it to determine availability of
shadow stack instruction intrinsics, but it is no longer directly used.

Comes with a clang patch (D46881).

Patch by mike.dvoretsky

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46882

llvm-svn: 332705
2018-05-18 11:58:25 +00:00
Gabor Buella a832b22bae [X86] ptwrite intrinsic
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46539

llvm-svn: 331961
2018-05-10 07:26:05 +00:00
Gabor Buella 2b5e96004b [x86] Introduce the pconfig instruction
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46430

llvm-svn: 331739
2018-05-08 06:47:36 +00:00
Gabor Buella c8ded04e85 [X86] movdiri and movdir64b instructions
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45983

llvm-svn: 331248
2018-05-01 10:01:16 +00:00
Gabor Buella 1a2ce572bf [X86] Revert r330638 - accidental commit
llvm-svn: 330640
2018-04-23 20:05:51 +00:00
Gabor Buella 213a7cda1f [X86] movdiri and movdir64b instructions
Reviewers: craig.topper
llvm-svn: 330638
2018-04-23 20:00:59 +00:00
Gabor Buella 31fa8025ba [X86] WaitPKG instructions
Three new instructions:

umonitor - Sets up a linear address range to be
monitored by hardware and activates the monitor.
The address range should be a writeback memory
caching type.

umwait - A hint that allows the processor to
stop instruction execution and enter an
implementation-dependent optimized state
until occurrence of a class of events.

tpause - Directs the processor to enter an
implementation-dependent optimized state
until the TSC reaches the value in EDX:EAX.

Also modifying the description of the mfence
instruction, as the rep prefix (0xF3) was allowed
before, which would conflict with umonitor during
disassembly.

Before:
$ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble
.text
mfence

After:
$ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble
.text
umonitor        %rax

Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45253

llvm-svn: 330462
2018-04-20 18:42:47 +00:00
Craig Topper bc895a3afc [X86] Enable popcnt false dependency breaking on Silvermont and Goldmont.
Silvermont and Goldmont have the same issue on popcnt as Sandy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake. Believe it is fixed in Goldmont Plus.

llvm-svn: 330358
2018-04-19 19:25:24 +00:00
Gabor Buella 8f1646b579 [X86] Introduce archs: goldmont-plus & tremont
Using Goldmont's cost tables for these two upcoming
atom archs.

Reviewers: craig.topper

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45612

llvm-svn: 330109
2018-04-16 07:47:35 +00:00
Gabor Buella 604be4424b [X86] Introduce cldemote instruction
Hint to hardware to move the cache line containing the
address to a more distant level of the cache without
writing back to memory.

Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45256

llvm-svn: 329992
2018-04-13 07:35:08 +00:00
Gabor Buella 2ef36f3571 [X86] Describe wbnoinvd instruction
Similar to the wbinvd instruction, except this
one does not invalidate caches. Ring 0 only.
The encoding matches a wbinvd instruction with
an F3 prefix.

Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43816

llvm-svn: 329847
2018-04-11 20:01:57 +00:00
Gabor Buella 213edc4a15 [X86] Split up -march=icelake to -client & -server
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, echristo

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45055

llvm-svn: 329742
2018-04-10 18:59:13 +00:00
Gabor Buella 3eab22d896 [X86] Disable SGX for Skylake Server
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, echristo

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45057

llvm-svn: 329700
2018-04-10 13:58:57 +00:00
Clement Courbet b449379eae [MC][TableGen] Add optional libpfm counter names for ProcResUnits.
Summary:
Subtargets can define the libpfm counter names that can be used to
measure cycles and uops issued on ProcResUnits.
This allows making llvm-exegesis available on more targets.
Fixes PR36984.

Reviewers: gchatelet, RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45360

llvm-svn: 329675
2018-04-10 08:16:37 +00:00
Geoff Berry f8bf2ec0a8 [MachineOperand][Target] MachineOperand::isRenamable semantics changes
Summary:
Add a target option AllowRegisterRenaming that is used to opt in to
post-register-allocation renaming of registers.  This is set to 0 by
default, which causes the hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq
fields of all opcodes to be set to 1, causing
MachineOperand::isRenamable to always return false.

Set the AllowRegisterRenaming flag to 1 for all in-tree targets that
have lit tests that were effected by enabling COPY forwarding in
MachineCopyPropagation (AArch64, AMDGPU, ARM, Hexagon, Mips, PowerPC,
RISCV, Sparc, SystemZ and X86).

Add some more comments describing the semantics of the
MachineOperand::isRenamable function and how it is set and maintained.

Change isRenamable to check the operand's opcode
hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq bit directly instead of
relying on it being consistently reflected in the IsRenamable bit
setting.

Clear the IsRenamable bit when changing an operand's register value.

Remove target code that was clearing the IsRenamable bit when changing
registers/opcodes now that this is done conservatively by default.

Change setting of hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq in AMDGPU target to be done in
one place covering all opcodes that have constant pipe read limit
restrictions.

Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB

Subscribers: aemerson, arsenm, jyknight, mcrosier, sdardis, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, escha, nemanjai, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042

llvm-svn: 325931
2018-02-23 18:25:08 +00:00
Craig Topper d710adac2d [X86] Disable CLWB for Cannon Lake
Cannon Lake does not support CLWB, therefore it
does not include all features listed under SKX anymore.

Instead, enumerate all SKX features with the exception of CLWB.

Patch by Gabor Buella

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43380

llvm-svn: 325654
2018-02-21 00:15:48 +00:00
Craig Topper a8f87a36f1 [X86] Add FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps to skylake server CPU to match skylake client.
llvm-svn: 323700
2018-01-29 21:56:48 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 02bdac53e7 [X86] Emit 11-byte or 15-byte NOPs on recent AMD targets, else default to 10-byte NOPs (PR22965)
We currently emit up to 15-byte NOPs on all targets (apart from Silvermont), which stalls performance on some targets with decoders that struggle with 2 or 3 more '66' prefixes.

This patch flags recent AMD targets (btver1/znver1) to still emit 15-byte NOPs and bdver* targets to emit 11-byte NOPs. All other targets now emit 10-byte NOPs apart from SilverMont CPUs which still emit 7-byte NOPS.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42616

llvm-svn: 323693
2018-01-29 21:24:31 +00:00
Craig Topper b207dd6870 [X86] Add 'rdrnd' feature to silvermont to match recent gcc bug fix.
gcc recently fixed this bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546

llvm-svn: 323550
2018-01-26 19:34:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth c58f2166ab Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre..
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this
is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post
for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html

The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution
of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the
prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The
gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for
reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data
followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some
predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors
cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative
execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the
nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel
processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to
a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain.

The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many
cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and
a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in
this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table
lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr
sequences into a switch over integers.

However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as
a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the
processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The
retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the
call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result
is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be
used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an
actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address.

On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device.
For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several
different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if
one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct
stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address.

This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886

We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline
thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them.
These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that
routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to
different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use
`-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this
case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
  __llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
  __llvm_external_retpoline_eax
  __llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
  __llvm_external_retpoline_edx
  __llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.

There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.

The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from
precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have
found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them
here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.

For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt`
(or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly
recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the
retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.

When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%)
even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to
the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance
sensitive paths of the kernel.

When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially
C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic
performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or
virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%.

However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce
the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to
direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower
switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we
*strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically
linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well
tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from
the use of retpoline.

We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available
as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to
get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're
planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get
a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors.

This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid,
Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time
sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to
everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in
discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at
Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline
design.

Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer

Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723

llvm-svn: 323155
2018-01-22 22:05:25 +00:00
Marina Yatsina 77a21dbad4 Break false dependencies for POPCNT, LZCNT, TZCNT
Add POPCNT, LZCNT, TZCNT to the list of instructions that have false dependency.
Add a test to make sure BreakFalseDeps breaks the dependencies for these instructions.
Update affected tests.

This fixes bugzilla https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33869

This is the final of multiple patches that fix this bugzilla.
Most of the patches are intended at refactoring the existent code.

Reviews of the refactoring done to enable this change:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40330
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40331
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40332
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40333

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40334

Change-Id: If95cbf1a3f5c7dccff8f1b22ecb397542147303d
llvm-svn: 323096
2018-01-22 10:07:01 +00:00
Craig Topper 0d797a34d8 [X86] Add support for passing 'prefer-vector-width' function attribute into X86Subtarget and exposing via X86's getRegisterWidth TTI interface.
This will cause the vectorizers to do some limiting of the vector widths they create. This is not a strict limit. There are reasons I know of that the loop vectorizer will generate larger vectors for.

I've written this in such a way that the interface will only return a properly supported width(0/128/256/512) even if the attribute says something funny like 384 or 10.

This has been split from D41895 with the remainder in a follow up commit.

llvm-svn: 323015
2018-01-20 00:26:08 +00:00
Craig Topper 84b26b90d1 [X86] Add intrinsic support for the RDPID instruction
This adds a new instrinsic to support the rdpid instruction. The implementation is a bit weird because the intrinsic is defined as always returning 32-bits, but the assembler support thinks the instruction produces a 64-bit register in 64-bit mode. But really it zeros the upper 32 bits. So I had to add separate patterns where 64-bit mode uses an extract_subreg.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42205

llvm-svn: 322910
2018-01-18 23:52:31 +00:00
Craig Topper 505f38a059 [X86] Move HasNOPL to a subtarget feature bit. Plumb MCSubtargetInfo through the MCAsmBackend constructor
After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721

llvm-svn: 322227
2018-01-10 22:07:16 +00:00
Craig Topper 55cfa89f20 [X86] Add CLWB to icelake.
Per Table 1-1 in October 2017 edition of Intel® Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features

llvm-svn: 321501
2017-12-27 22:04:04 +00:00
Craig Topper 67885f5d58 [X86] Enable PRFCHW feature on KNL/KNM and all CPUs inherited from Broadwell.
llvm-svn: 321336
2017-12-22 02:41:12 +00:00
Craig Topper e268598dd3 [X86] Add prefetchwt1 instruction and overhaul priorities and isel enabling for prefetch instructions.
Previously prefetch was only considered legal if sse was enabled, but it should be supported with 3dnow as well.

The prfchw flag now imply at least some form of prefetch without the write hint is available, either the sse or 3dnow version. This is true even if 3dnow and sse are explicitly disabled.

Similarly prefetchwt1 feature implies availability of prefetchw and the the prefetcht0/1/2/nta instructions. This way we can support _MM_HINT_ET0 using prefetchw and _MM_HINT_ET1 with prefetchwt1. And its assumed that if we have levels for the write hint we would have levels for the non-write hint, thus why we enable the sse prefetch instructions.

I believe this behavior is consistent with gcc. I've updated the prefetch.ll to test all of these combinations.

llvm-svn: 321335
2017-12-22 02:30:30 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim fd5df639a3 [X86][SSE] Add cpu feature for aggressive combining to variable shuffles
As mentioned in D38318 and D40865, modern Intel processors prefer to combine multiple shuffles to a variable shuffle mask (PSHUFB/VPERMPS etc.) instead of having multiple stage 'fixed' shuffles which put more pressure on Port 5 (at the expense of extra shuffle mask loads).

This patch provides a FeatureFastVariableShuffle target flag for Haswell+ CPUs that prefers combining 2 or more fixed shuffles to a single variable shuffle (default is 3 shuffles).

The long term aim is to drive more of this from schedule data (probably via the MC) but we're not close to being ready for that yet.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41323

llvm-svn: 321074
2017-12-19 13:16:43 +00:00
Craig Topper 57c2815cbe [X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs.
This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models.

llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-10 17:42:36 +00:00
Oren Ben Simhon fa582b075c Control-Flow Enforcement Technology - Shadow Stack support (LLVM side)
Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only.
The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address.
If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered.
The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP).
The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism.

The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT.

For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223

Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4
llvm-svn: 318996
2017-11-26 13:02:45 +00:00
Coby Tayree d8b17bedfa [x86][icelake]GFNI
galois field arithmetic (GF(2^8)) insns:
gf2p8affineinvqb
gf2p8affineqb
gf2p8mulb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40373

llvm-svn: 318993
2017-11-26 09:36:41 +00:00