This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
As a fly-by fix, also move it closer to where it is needed, and add a
comment explaining the existence of this weird function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121231
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
I assume nobody ever uses std::string_view::max_size() outside of
testing. However, we should still return a value that is based on
something with a reasonable rationale. Previously, we would forget
to take into account the size of the character type stored in the
string, and this patch takes that into account.
Thanks to @mclow.lists for pointing out this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114395
Implement P1989R2 which adds a range constructor for `string_view`.
Adjust `operator/=` in `path` to avoid atomic constraints caching issue
getting provoked from this PR.
Add defaulted template argument to `string_view`'s "sufficient
overloads" to avoid mangling issues in `clang-cl` builds. It is a
MSVC mangling bug that this works around.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113161
The `string_view` constructor taking an iterator/sentinel uses concepts
instead of type traits like the Standard states. Using `same_as` instead
of `is_same_v` should be harmless. Prefer `std::is_same_v` instead which is
cheaper to compile. Replace `convertible_to` with `is_convertible_v` as
well.
This observation came up while working on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114561
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Implement P1391 (https://wg21.link/p1391) which allows
`std::string_view` to be constructible from any contiguous range of
characters.
Note that a different paper (http://wg21.link/P1989) handles the generic
range constructor for `std::string_view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110718
This is the initial patch to implement ranges in libc++.
Implements parts of:
- P0896R4 One Ranges Proposal
- P1870 forwarding-range is too subtle
- LWG3379 in several library names is misleading
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, cjdb, zoecarver, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90999
As mandated by the Standard's various synopses, e.g. [iterator.synopsis].
Searching the TeX source for '#include' is a good way to find all of these
mandates.
The new tests are all autogenerated by utils/generate_header_inclusion_tests.py.
I was SHOCKED by how many mandates there are, and how many of them
libc++ wasn't conforming with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99309
Left to finish P0482:
* <cuchar> header.
* Parts of <memory_resource> concerning char8_t. Also, tests for hash<pmr::*string>.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99184
Adds `noexcept` to `string_view`/`string::find` and similar members
(`rfind`, etc.). See discussion in D95251. Refs D95821.
Reviewed By: curdeius, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95848
* The only exception is that the flag -std=c++2a is still used not to break compatibility with older compilers (clang <= 9, gcc <= 9).
* Bump _LIBCPP_STD_VER for C++20 to 20 and use 21 for the future standard (C++2b).
That's a preparation step to add c++2b support to libc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93383
This attribute permits a typedef to be associated with a class template
specialization as a preferred way of naming that class template
specialization. This permits us to specify that (for example) the
preferred way to express 'std::basic_string<char>' is as 'std::string'.
The attribute is applied to the various class templates in libc++ that have
corresponding well-known typedef names.
This is a re-commit. The previous commit was reverted because it exposed
a pre-existing bug that has since been fixed / worked around; see
PR48434.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91311
This change exposed a pre-existing issue with deserialization cycles
caused by a combination of attributes and template instantiations
violating the deserialization ordering restrictions; see PR48434 for
details.
A previous commit attempted to work around PR48434, but appears to have
only been a partial fix, and fixing this properly seems non-trivial.
Backing out for now to unblock things.
This reverts commit 98f76adf4e and
commit a64c26a47a.
This attribute permits a typedef to be associated with a class template
specialization as a preferred way of naming that class template
specialization. This permits us to specify that (for example) the
preferred way to express 'std::basic_string<char>' is as 'std::string'.
The attribute is applied to the various class templates in libc++ that have
corresponding well-known typedef names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91311
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
This declaration was previously missing despite appearing in the
synopsis. Users are still required to include <ostream> to get the
definition of the streaming operator.
llvm-svn: 372909
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
llvm-svn: 367770
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Louis Dionne