These are intended to mimic warnings available in gcc.
-Wunused-but-set-variable is triggered in the case of a variable which
appears on the LHS of an assignment but not otherwise used.
For instance:
void f() {
int x;
x = 0;
}
-Wunused-but-set-parameter works similarly, but for function parameters
instead of variables.
In C++, they are triggered only for scalar types; otherwise, they are
triggered for all types. This is gcc's behavior.
-Wunused-but-set-parameter is controlled by -Wextra, while
-Wunused-but-set-variable is controlled by -Wunused. This is slightly
different from gcc's behavior, but seems most consistent with clang's
behavior for -Wunused-parameter and -Wunused-variable.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581
Compute and propagate conversion kind to diagnostics helper in C++
to provide more specific diagnostics about incorrect implicit
conversions in assignments, initializations, params, etc...
Duplicated some diagnostics as errors because C++ is more strict.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74116
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
shadow of a block expression with non-trivial destructed cleanups,
we should flag that in the enclosing function, not in the block
that we're about to pop.
llvm-svn: 154646
ActOnFinishFunctionBody/ActOnBlockStmtExpr. This way, we ensure that
we diagnose undefined labels before the jump-scope checker gets run,
since the jump-scope checker requires (as its invariant) that all of
the GotoStmts be wired up correctly.
Fixes PR9495.
llvm-svn: 127738
forward-looking "goto" statement, make sure to insert it *after* the
last declaration in the identifier resolver's declaration chain that
is either outside of the function/block/method's scope or that is
declared in that function/block/method's specific scope. Previously,
we could end up inserting the label ahead of declarations in inner
scopes, confusing C++ name lookup.
Fixes PR9491/<rdar://problem/9140426> and <rdar://problem/9135994>.
Note that the crash-on-invalid PR9495 is *not* fixed. That's a
separate issue.
llvm-svn: 127737
cannot yet be resolved, be sure to push the new label declaration into
the right place within the identifier chain. Otherwise, name lookup in
C++ gets confused when searching for names that are lexically closer
than the label. Fixes PR9463.
llvm-svn: 127623
Michael Benfield