Commit Graph

51 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matheus Izvekov 15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02eff because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov 7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92 because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Aaron Ballman 15fbae8ac3 Use "default member initializer" instead of "in-class initializer" for diagnostics.
This changes some diagnostics to use terminology from the standard
rather than invented terminology, which improves consistency with other
diagnostics as well. There are no functional changes intended other
than wording and naming.
2020-09-29 15:04:23 -04:00
Paul Robinson 9e04b532df [CXX] Exercise all paths through these tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63894

llvm-svn: 365555
2019-07-09 20:49:07 +00:00
Richard Smith b23c5e8c3d [c++20] Implement P0846R0: allow (ADL-only) calls to template-ids whose
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.

In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.

Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.

The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.

llvm-svn: 360308
2019-05-09 03:31:27 +00:00
Charles Li 1a88adbb27 Lit C++11 Compatibility Patch #8
24 tests have been updated for C++11 compatibility.

llvm-svn: 266387
2016-04-14 23:47:07 +00:00
Nico Weber 71e377d6ee If a function decl cannot be merged, mark it as invalid.
Clang currently crashes on

    class C {
      C() = default;
      C() = delete;
    };

My cunning plan for fixing this was to change the `if (!FnD)` in
Parser::ParseCXXInlineMethodDef() to `if (!FnD || FnD->isInvalidDecl)` – but
alas, the second constructor decl wasn't marked as invalid.  This lets
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl() return true on function redeclarations, which leads
to them being marked invalid.

This also improves error messages when functions are redeclared.

llvm-svn: 226365
2015-01-17 02:33:17 +00:00
Serge Pavlov b716b3ca1f Avoid spurious error messages if parent template class cannot be instantiated
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D924

llvm-svn: 188133
2013-08-10 05:54:47 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 43bc036e8a Promote the warning about extra qualification on a declaration from a
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.

llvm-svn: 163831
2012-09-13 20:16:20 +00:00
Richard Smith b8caac8e32 Part of PR10101: after a parse error in a declaration, try harder to find the
right place to pick up parsing. In C++, this had a tendency to skip everything
declared within headers if the TU starts with garbage.

llvm-svn: 154530
2012-04-11 20:59:20 +00:00
Richard Smith fa0a1f531f Improve diagnostics for invalid use of non-static members / this:
* s/nonstatic/non-static/ in the diagnostics, since the latter form outvoted
  the former by 28-2 in our diagnostics.
* Fix the "use of member in static member function" diagnostic to correctly
  detect this situation inside a block or lambda.
* Produce a more specific "invalid use of non-static member" diagnostic for
  the case where a nested class member refers to a member of a
  lexically-surrounding class.

llvm-svn: 154073
2012-04-05 01:13:04 +00:00
Richard Smith e434590bd9 Change the diagnostics which said 'accepted as an extension' to instead say
'is an extension'. The former is inappropriate and confusing when building with
-Werror/-pedantic-errors.

llvm-svn: 147357
2011-12-29 21:57:33 +00:00
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ab6bc1d13e Make the -Wc++11-compat warnings ignored by default, so we don't break
valid C++98/03 code. However, add these warnings to -Wall, for those
who obviously already like clean code.

llvm-svn: 142903
2011-10-25 03:07:45 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 205d044552 Switch diagnostic text from "C++0x" over to "C++11".
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.

llvm-svn: 141801
2011-10-12 19:26:40 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 728d00b8e7 Parse the initializer for a class member after handling its
declarator, so that the declarator is in scope for the
initializer. Fixes PR9989.

llvm-svn: 141539
2011-10-10 14:49:18 +00:00
Richard Smith 256336d9ab Mark the ExtWarn for in-class initialization of static const float members as a GNU extension. Don't extend the scope of this extension to all literal types in C++0x mode.
llvm-svn: 140820
2011-09-29 23:18:34 +00:00
Richard Smith ee6311df69 In C++0x, static const volatile data members cannot be initialized in-class.
llvm-svn: 140809
2011-09-29 21:28:14 +00:00
Richard Smith 2316cd8b79 constexpr: semantic checking for constexpr variables.
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).

llvm-svn: 140801
2011-09-29 19:11:37 +00:00
Richard Smith 58c7433709 PR10458: Finesse behaviour of C++0x features when in pre-0x mode. Accept for-range and auto with an ExtWarn, and produce a -Wc++0x-compat warning in C++98 mode when auto is used as a storage class.
llvm-svn: 139102
2011-09-04 19:54:14 +00:00
Richard Smith 938f40b5aa Implement support for C++11 in-class initialization of non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 132878
2011-06-11 17:19:42 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis b85cd7c312 Error for use of field from anonymous struct or union should say "invalid use of nonstatic data member"
not "call to non-static member function without an object argument".

llvm-svn: 124576
2011-01-31 07:04:33 +00:00
Francois Pichet 6d76e6cd92 Better diagnostic for superfluous scope specifier inside a class definition for member functions. + Fixit.
Example: 
class A {
   void A::foo(); //warning: extra qualification on member 'foo'
};

llvm-svn: 115347
2010-10-01 21:19:28 +00:00
John McCall db76892e72 Support in-class initialization of static const floating-point data members.
llvm-svn: 113663
2010-09-10 23:21:22 +00:00
Chris Lattner 53fa04909c make clang print types as "const int *" instead of "int const*",
which is should have done from the beginning.  As usual, the most
fun with this sort of change is updating all the testcases.

llvm-svn: 113090
2010-09-05 00:04:01 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 428119e39a When parsing cached C++ method declarations/definitions, save the
"previous token" location at the end of the class definition. This
eliminates a badly-placed error + Fix-It when the ';' following a
class definition is missing. Fixes <rdar://problem/8066414>.

llvm-svn: 106175
2010-06-16 23:45:56 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 0c6f539564 When determining whether we can use "this", make sure to look through
enum contexts (along with block contexts, which we already did). Fixes
PR7196.

llvm-svn: 104444
2010-05-22 16:25:05 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c4c574bd2e Test that mutability of class members that involve class definitions actually works
llvm-svn: 103959
2010-05-17 19:45:25 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c9a99c5e5c mutable is a storage class that can follow a class/struct/union definition. Fixes PR7153
llvm-svn: 103954
2010-05-17 18:19:56 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f19ac0ede9 Downgrade the "declaration does not declare anything" error to a
warning. It's not harmful to have such pointless declarations, and GCC
does not diagnose this issue consistently.

llvm-svn: 100814
2010-04-08 21:33:23 +00:00
John McCall 9a3da8e6cf Provide a test case for PR6629.
llvm-svn: 98702
2010-03-17 01:31:25 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Sebastian Redl d6f7850117 Have the parser tell sema whether a member declaration is a function definition. This allows sema to not emit spurious diagnostics in some invalid code.
llvm-svn: 89816
2009-11-24 23:38:44 +00:00
Sebastian Redl 03b67ea1a2 Make sure redeclaration chains are properly linked, even through invalid decls. This fixes PR5415.
llvm-svn: 89777
2009-11-24 17:14:34 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 0c88030abd Move most of the checking from ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator to other, more general routines. This is a step toward separating the checking logic from Declarators, which in turn is required for template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 66734
2009-03-11 23:00:04 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 1efa437be6 Implement basic template instantiation for fields. Reshuffle checking
for FieldDecls so that the parser and the template instantiation make
use of the same semantic checking module.

llvm-svn: 66685
2009-03-11 18:59:21 +00:00
Chris Lattner d26760aecb refactor C++ bitfield checking a bit (haha)
llvm-svn: 66213
2009-03-05 23:01:03 +00:00
Chris Lattner 73bf7b42b6 fix PR3607 and a fixme, by checking bitfield constraints
more consistently.

llvm-svn: 66210
2009-03-05 22:45:59 +00:00
Douglas Gregor fb03466388 Complete semantic checking for typedef redeclarations in C++. The
rules are slightly different than in C, and now we handle both
dialects properly.

llvm-svn: 63211
2009-01-28 17:15:10 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 82ac25e4a7 Unify the code for defining tags in C and C++, so that we always
introduce a Scope for the body of a tag. This reduces the number of
semantic differences between C and C++ structs and unions, and will
help with other features (e.g., anonymous unions) in C. Some important
points:

  - Fields are now in the "member" namespace (IDNS_Member), to keep
    them separate from tags and ordinary names in C. See the new test
    in Sema/member-reference.c for an example of why this matters. In
    C++, ordinary and member name lookup will find members in both the
    ordinary and member namespace, so the difference between
    IDNS_Member and IDNS_Ordinary is erased by Sema::LookupDecl (but
    only in C++!). 
  - We always introduce a Scope and push a DeclContext when we're
    defining a tag, in both C and C++. Previously, we had different
    actions and different Scope/CurContext behavior for enums, C
    structs/unions, and C++ structs/unions/classes. Now, it's one pair
    of actions. (Yay!)

There's still some fuzziness in the handling of struct/union/enum
definitions within other struct/union/enum definitions in C. We'll
need to do some more cleanup to eliminate some reliance on CurContext
before we can solve this issue for real. What we want is for something
like this:

  struct X {
    struct T { int x; } t;
  };

to introduce T into translation unit scope (placing it at the
appropriate point in the IdentifierResolver chain, too), but it should
still have struct X as its lexical declaration
context. PushOnScopeChains isn't smart enough to do that yet, though,
so there's a FIXME test in nested-redef.c

llvm-svn: 61940
2009-01-08 20:45:30 +00:00
Sebastian Redl a2b5e31cb1 Diagnose declarations that don't declare anything, and fix PR3020.
Examples:
int;
typedef int;

llvm-svn: 61454
2008-12-28 15:28:59 +00:00
Sebastian Redl 8071edb297 Implement effects of 'mutable', and a few comments from Chris on its parsing.
llvm-svn: 59470
2008-11-17 23:24:37 +00:00
Sebastian Redl ccdfabab35 Implement parsing and semantic checking of the 'mutable' keyword.
Thanks to Doug for the review. Actual effects of mutable to follow.

llvm-svn: 59331
2008-11-14 23:42:31 +00:00
Sebastian Redl b426f63302 Sema-check virtual declarations. Complete dynamic_cast checking.
llvm-svn: 58804
2008-11-06 15:59:35 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis 2e3e756304 Fix this bug:
typedef int f();
struct S {
   f *x; // incorrectly assuming this is function decl, leading to failed assertions.
};

llvm-svn: 57598
2008-10-15 20:23:22 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis 1207d31952 Fix a bug that crashed clang when parsing this:
class C {
  static const int number = 50;
  static int arr[number];
};

Here's how it worked:
-GetTypeForDeclarator was called from both Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator and Sema::ActOnDeclarator.
-VariableArrayTypes are not uniqued so two VariableArrayTypes were created with the same DeclRefExpr.
-On exit they both tried to destroy that one DeclRefExpr.

The fix is not to use GetTypeForDeclarator from the Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator.

llvm-svn: 57313
2008-10-08 22:20:31 +00:00