With this change we're finally able to compile and run the (infamous)
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
std::cout << "Hello, World" << std::endl;
}
$ clang hello.cpp -lstdc++ -o hello
$ ./hello
Hello, World
llvm-svn: 83559
function and member function templates that are not definitions. Add
more tests to ensure that explicit specializations of member function
templates prevent instantiation.
llvm-svn: 83550
templates, and keep track of how those member classes were
instantiated or specialized.
Make sure that we don't try to instantiate an explicitly-specialized
member class of a class template, when that explicit specialization
was a declaration rather than a definition.
llvm-svn: 83547
track of the kind of specialization or instantiation. Also, check the
scope of the specialization and ensure that a specialization
declaration without an initializer is not a definition.
llvm-svn: 83533
specialization kind is TSK_ImplicitInstantiation. Previously, we would
end up implicitly instantiating functions that had explicit
specialization declarations or explicit instantiation declarations
(with no corresponding definitions).
llvm-svn: 83511
function of a class template was implicitly instantiated, explicitly
instantiated (declaration or definition), or explicitly
specialized. The same MemberSpecializationInfo structure will be used
for static data members and member classes as well.
llvm-svn: 83509
templates. Previously, these weren't handled as specializations at
all. The AST for representing these as specializations is still a work
in progress.
llvm-svn: 83498
its definition may be defined, including in a class.
Also, put in an assertion when trying to instantiate a class template
partial specialization of a member template, which is not yet
implemented.
llvm-svn: 83469
declarations and explicit template instantiations, improving
diagnostics and making the code usable for function template
specializations (as well as class template specializations and partial
specializations).
llvm-svn: 83436
Doug, please review. There is a FIXME in the test case with a question
which is unrelated to this patch (that is, error is issued
before set of builtins are added to the candidate list).
llvm-svn: 83429
explicit specializations can occur. Also, fix a minor recovery bug
where we should allow declarations coming from the parser to be NULL.
llvm-svn: 83416
adding assert
This fix required a few changes:
SimpleSValuator:
- Eagerly replace a symbolic value with its constant value in EvalBinOpNN
when it is constrained to a constant. This allows us to better constant fold
values along a path.
- Handle trivial case of '<', '>' comparison of pointers when the two pointers
are exactly the same.
RegionStoreManager:
llvm-svn: 83358
of the flow-control checks for falling off the end of a function,
since the return type may instantiate to void. Similarly, if a
return statement has an expression and the return type of the function
is void, don't complain if the expression is type-dependent, since
that type could instantiate to void.
Fixes PR5071.
llvm-svn: 83222
functions when they are explicitly declared, e.g., via a function
template specialization or explicit template instantiation
declaration. Don't try to synthesize bodies for the special member
functions in this case; rather, check whether we have an implicit
declaration and, if so, synthesize the appropriate function
body. Fixes PR5084.
llvm-svn: 83212
type is a template-id (e.g., basic_ostream<CharT, Traits>) and the
argument type is a class that has a derived class matching the
parameter type. Previously, we were giving up on template argument
deduction too early.
llvm-svn: 83177
overload candidates (but not the built-in ones). We still rely on the
underlying built-in semantic analysis to produce the initial
diagnostic, then print the candidates following that diagnostic.
One side advantage of this approach is that we can perform more validation
of C++'s operator overloading with built-in candidates vs. the
semantic analysis for those built-in operators: when there are no
viable candidates, we know to expect an error from the built-in
operator handling code. Otherwise, we are not modeling the built-in
semantics properly within operator overloading. This is checked as:
assert(Result.isInvalid() &&
"C++ binary operator overloading is missing
candidates!");
if (Result.isInvalid())
PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false);
The assert() catches cases where we're wrong in a +Asserts build. The
"if" makes sure that, if this happens in a production clang
(-Asserts), we still build the proper built-in operator and continue
on our merry way. This is effectively what happened before this
change, but we've added the assert() to catch more flies.
llvm-svn: 83175
"usual deallocation function" with two arguments. CodeGen will have to
handle this case specifically, since the value for the second argument
(the size of the allocated object) may have to be computed at run
time.
Fixes the Sema part of PR4782.
llvm-svn: 83080
identified with a false positive reported by Thomas Clement. This
involved doing another rewrite of
RegionStoreManager::RemoveDeadBindings(), which phrases the entire
problem of scanning for dead regions as a graph exploration problem.
It is more methodic than the previous implementation.
llvm-svn: 83053
are only specially treated by RegionStore::InvalidateRegion() when
their super region is also invalidated. When this isn't the case,
conjure a new symbol for a FieldRegion. Thanks to Zhongxing Xu and
Daniel Dunbar for pointing out this issue.
llvm-svn: 83043
functions that occur in multiple declaration contexts, e.g., because
some were found via using declarations. Now, isDeclInScope will build
a new overload set (when needed) containing only those declarations
that are actually in scope. This eliminates a problem found with
libstdc++'s <iostream>, where the presence of using
In the longer term, I'd like to eliminate Sema::isDeclInScope in favor
of better handling of the RedeclarationOnly flag in the name-lookup
routines. That way, name lookup only returns the entities that matter,
rather than taking the current two-pass approach of producing too many
results and then filtering our the wrong results. It's not efficient,
and I'm sure that we aren't filtering everywhere we should be.
llvm-svn: 82954
<rdar://problem/6914474> checker doesn't realize that variable might
have been assigned if a pointer to that variable was passed to another
function via a structure
The problem here was the RegionStoreManager::InvalidateRegion didn't
invalidate the bindings of invalidated regions. This required a
rewrite of this method using a worklist.
As part of this fix, changed ValueManager::getConjuredSymbolVal() to
require a 'void*' SymbolTag argument. This tag is used to
differentiate two different symbols created at the same location.
llvm-svn: 82920
specializations such as:
friend class std::vector<int>;
by using the same code path as explicit specializations, customized to
reference an existing ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl (or build a new
"undeclared" one).
llvm-svn: 82875
class templates. We now treat friend class templates much more like
normal class templates, except that they still get special name lookup
rules. Fixes PR5057 and eliminates a bunch of spurious diagnostics in
<iostream>.
llvm-svn: 82848
template void f<int>(int);
~~~~~~
Previously, we silently dropped the template arguments. With this
change, we now use the template arguments (when available) as the
explicitly-specified template arguments used to aid template argument
deduction for explicit template instantiations.
llvm-svn: 82806
Fix clang_getCursorDecl to do the right thing for expr refs
Fixup test file to accommodate new output (which includes the line/column for the referenced decl)
llvm-svn: 82798
member functions of class template specializations, and static data
members. The mechanics are (mostly) present, but the semantic analysis
is very weak.
llvm-svn: 82789
value-dependent. Audit (and fixed) all calls to
Expr::isNullPointerConstant() to provide the correct behavior with
value-dependent expressions. Fixes PR5041 and a crash in libstdc++
<locale>.
In the same vein, properly compute value- and type-dependence for
ChooseExpr. Fixes PR4996.
llvm-svn: 82748
first implementation recognizes when a function declaration is an
explicit function template specialization (based on the presence of a
template<> header), performs template argument deduction + ambiguity
resolution to determine which template is being specialized, and hooks
There are many caveats here:
- We completely and totally drop any explicitly-specified template
arguments on the floor
- We don't diagnose any of the extra semantic things that we should
diagnose.
- I haven't looked to see that we're getting the right linkage for
explicit specializations
On a happy note, this silences a bunch of errors that show up in
libstdc++'s <iostream>, although Clang still can't get through the
entire header.
llvm-svn: 82728
Type hierarchy. Demote 'volatile' to extended-qualifier status. Audit our
use of qualifiers and fix a few places that weren't dealing with qualifiers
quite right; many more remain.
llvm-svn: 82705
handled correctly.
- <rdar://problem/7247671> Function arguments incorrect when function returns a
struct on i386 w/ llvm-g++ and clang
llvm-svn: 82681
The issue was a discrepancy between how RegionStoreManager::Bind() and
RegionStoreManager::Retrieve() derived the "key" for the first element
of a symbolic region.
llvm-svn: 82680
Mike Stump