DAGCombiner::visitBITCAST will perform:
fold (bitconvert (fneg x)) -> (xor (bitconvert x), signbit)
fold (bitconvert (fabs x)) -> (and (bitconvert x), (not signbit))
As shown in double-bitmanip-dagcombines.ll, this can be advantageous. But
RV32FD doesn't use bitcast directly (as i64 isn't a legal type), and instead
uses RISCVISD::SplitF64. This patch adds an equivalent DAG combine for
SplitF64.
llvm-svn: 352247
(fcopysign a, (fneg b)) will be expanded to bitwise operations by
DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatRes_FCOPYSIGN if the floating point type isn't
legal. Arguably it might be worth doing a combine even if it is legal.
llvm-svn: 352240
The intrinsic names erroneously used the .f32 variant. As the return and
argument types were still double the intrinsics calls worked properly.
llvm-svn: 352211
This target-independent code won't trigger for cases such as RV32FD where
custom SelectionDAG nodes are generated. These new tests demonstrate such
cases. Additionally, float-arith.ll was updated so that fneg.s, fsgnjn.s, and
fabs.s selection patterns are actually exercised.
llvm-svn: 352199
Follow the same custom legalisation strategy as used in D57085 for
variable-length shifts (see that patch summary for more discussion). Although
we may lose out on some late-stage DAG combines, I think this custom
legalisation strategy is ultimately easier to reason about.
There are some codegen changes in rv64m-exhaustive-w-insts.ll but they are all
neutral in terms of the number of instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57096
llvm-svn: 352171
The previous DAG combiner-based approach had an issue with infinite loops
between the target-dependent and target-independent combiner logic (see
PR40333). Although this was worked around in rL351806, the combiner-based
approach is still potentially brittle and can fail to select the 32-bit shift
variant when profitable to do so, as demonstrated in the pr40333.ll test case.
This patch instead introduces target-specific SelectionDAG nodes for
SHLW/SRLW/SRAW and custom-lowers variable i32 shifts to them. pr40333.ll is a
good example of how this approach can improve codegen.
This adds DAG combine that does SimplifyDemandedBits on the operands (only
lower 32-bits of first operand and lower 5 bits of second operand are read).
This seems better than implementing SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode as there
is no guarantee that would be called (and it's not for e.g. the anyext return
test cases). Also implements ComputeNumSignBitsForTargetNode.
There are codegen changes in atomic-rmw.ll and atomic-cmpxchg.ll but the new
instruction sequences are semantically equivalent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57085
llvm-svn: 352169
Avoid the infinite loop caused by the target DAG combine converting ANYEXT to
SIGNEXT and the target-independent DAG combine logic converting back to
ANYEXT. Do this by not adding the new node to the worklist.
Committing directly as this definitely doesn't make the problem any worse, and
I intend to follow-up with a patch that avoids this custom combiner logic
altogether and just lowers the i32 operations to a target-specific
SelectionDAG node. This should be easier to reason about and improve codegen
quality in some cases (though may miss out on some later DAG combines).
llvm-svn: 351806
In order to support codegen RV64A, this patch:
* Introduces masked atomics intrinsics for atomicrmw operations and cmpxchg
that use the i64 type. These are ultimately lowered to masked operations
using lr.w/sc.w, but we need to use these alternate intrinsics for RV64
because i32 is not legal
* Modifies RISCVExpandPseudoInsts.cpp to handle PseudoAtomicLoadNand64 and
PseudoCmpXchg64
* Modifies the AtomicExpandPass hooks in RISCVTargetLowering to sext/trunc as
needed for RV64 and to select the i64 intrinsic IDs when necessary
* Adds appropriate patterns to RISCVInstrInfoA.td
* Updates test/CodeGen/RISCV/atomic-*.ll to show RV64A support
This ends up being a fairly mechanical change, as the logic for RV32A is
effectively reused.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53233
llvm-svn: 351422
Part of the effort to refactoring frame pointer code generation. We used
to use two function attributes "no-frame-pointer-elim" and
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" to represent three kinds of frame
pointer usage: (all) frames use frame pointer, (non-leaf) frames use
frame pointer, (none) frame use frame pointer. This CL makes the idea
explicit by using only one enum function attribute "frame-pointer"
Option "-frame-pointer=" replaces "-disable-fp-elim" for tools such as
llc.
"no-frame-pointer-elim" and "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" are still
supported for easy migration to "frame-pointer".
tests are mostly updated with
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim=false’ with ‘-frame-pointer=none’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim=false' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim=false/-frame-pointer=none/g"
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim’ with ‘-frame-pointer=all’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim/-frame-pointer=all/g"
Patch by Yuanfang Chen (tabloid.adroit)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56351
llvm-svn: 351049
As discussed on llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>, we have
to be careful when trying to select the *w RV64M instructions. i32 is not a
legal type for RV64 in the RISC-V backend, so operations have been promoted by
the time they reach instruction selection. Information about whether the
operation was originally a 32-bit operations has been lost, and it's easy to
write incorrect patterns.
Similarly to the variable 32-bit shifts, a DAG combine on ANY_EXTEND will
produce a SIGN_EXTEND if this is likely to result in sdiv/udiv/urem being
selected (and so save instructions to sext/zext the input operands).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53230
llvm-svn: 350993
This restores support for selecting the SLLW/SRLW/SRAW instructions, which was
removed in rL348067 as the previous patterns made some unsafe assumptions.
Also see the related llvm-dev discussion
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>
Ultimately I didn't introduce a custom SelectionDAG node, but instead added a
DAG combine that inserts an AssertZext i5 on the shift amount for an i32
variable-length shift and also added an ANY_EXTEND DAG-combine which will
instead produce a SIGN_EXTEND for an i32 variable-length shift, increasing the
opportunity to safely select SLLW/SRLW/SRAW.
There are obviously different ways of addressing this (a number discussed in
the llvm-dev thread), so I'd welcome further feedback and comments.
Note that there are now some cases in
test/CodeGen/RISCV/rv64i-exhaustive-w-insts.ll where sraw/srlw/sllw is
selected even though sra/srl/sll could be used without any extra instructions.
Given both are semantically equivalent, there doesn't seem a good reason to
prefer one vs the other. Given that would require more logic to still select
sra/srl/sll in those cases, I've left it preferring the *w variants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56264
llvm-svn: 350992
Adds support for the various RISC-V FMA instructions (fmadd, fmsub, fnmsub, fnmadd).
The criteria for choosing whether a fused add or subtract is used, as well as
whether the product is negated or not, is whether some of the arguments to the
llvm.fma.* intrinsic are negated or not. In the tests, extraneous fadd
instructions were added to avoid the negation being performed using a xor
trick, which prevented the proper FMA forms from being selected and thus
tested.
The FMA instruction patterns might seem incorrect (e.g., fnmadd: -rs1 * rs2 -
rs3), but they should be correct. The misleading names were inherited from
MIPS, where the negation happens after computing the sum.
The llvm.fmuladd.* intrinsics still do not generate RISC-V FMA instructions,
as that depends on TargetLowering::isFMAFasterthanFMulAndFAdd.
Some comments in the test files about what type of instructions are there
tested were updated, to better reflect the current content of those test
files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54205
Patch by Luís Marques.
llvm-svn: 349023
As noted by Eli Friedman <https://reviews.llvm.org/D52977?id=168629#1315291>,
the RV64I shift patterns for SLLW/SRLW/SRAW make some incorrect assumptions.
SRAW assumed that (sext_inreg foo, i32) could only be produced when
sign-extended an i32. However, it can be produced by input such as:
define i64 @tricky_ashr(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
%1 = shl i64 %a, 32
%2 = ashr i64 %1, 32
%3 = ashr i64 %2, %b
ret i64 %3
}
It's important not to select sraw in the above case, because sraw only uses
bits lower 5 bits from the shift, while a shift of 32-63 would be valid.
Similarly, the patterns for srlw assumed (and foo, 0xffffffff) would only be
produced when zero-extending a value that was originally i32 in LLVM IR. This
is obviously incorrect.
This patch removes the SLLW/SRLW/SRAW shift patterns for the time being and
adds test cases that would demonstrate a miscompile if the incorrect patterns
were re-added.
llvm-svn: 348067
For targets where i32 is not a legal type (e.g. 64-bit RISC-V),
LegalizeIntegerTypes must promote the result of ISD::FLT_ROUNDS_.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53820
llvm-svn: 347986
For targets where i32 is not a legal type (e.g. 64-bit RISC-V),
LegalizeIntegerTypes must promote the operands of ISD::PREFETCH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53281
llvm-svn: 347980
For targets where i32 is not a legal type (e.g. 64-bit RISC-V),
LegalizeIntegerTypes must promote the operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53279
llvm-svn: 347978
DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteSetCCOperands currently prefers to zero-extend
operands when it is able to do so. For some targets this is more expensive
than a sign-extension, which is also a valid choice. Introduce the
isSExtCheaperThanZExt hook and use it in the new SExtOrZExtPromotedInteger
helper. On RISC-V, we prefer sign-extension for FromTy == MVT::i32 and ToTy ==
MVT::i64, as it can be performed using a single instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52978
llvm-svn: 347977
As discussed in the RFC
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126690.html>, 64-bit
RISC-V has i64 as the only legal integer type. This patch introduces patterns
to support codegen of the new instructions
introduced in RV64I: addiw, addiw, subw, sllw, slliw, srlw, srliw, sraw,
sraiw, ld, sd.
Custom selection code is needed for srliw as SimplifyDemandedBits will remove
lower bits from the mask, meaning the obvious pattern won't work:
def : Pat<(sext_inreg (srl (and GPR:$rs1, 0xffffffff), uimm5:$shamt), i32),
(SRLIW GPR:$rs1, uimm5:$shamt)>;
This is sufficient to compile and execute all of the GCC torture suite for
RV64I other than those files using frameaddr or returnaddr intrinsics
(LegalizeDAG doesn't know how to promote the operands - a future patch
addresses this).
When promoting i32 sltu/sltiu operands, it would be more efficient to use
sign-extension rather than zero-extension for RV64. A future patch adds a hook
to allow this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52977
llvm-svn: 347973
Utilise a similar ('late') lowering strategy to D47882. The changes to
AtomicExpandPass allow this strategy to be utilised by other targets which
implement shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR.
All cmpxchg are lowered as 'strong' currently and failure ordering is ignored.
This is conservative but correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48131
llvm-svn: 347914
This commit introduces support for materialising 64-bit constants for RV64I,
making use of the RISCVMatInt::generateInstSeq helper in order to share logic
for immediate materialisation with the MC layer (where it's used for the li
pseudoinstruction).
test/CodeGen/RISCV/imm.ll is updated to test RV64, and gains new 64-bit
constant tests. It would be preferable if anyext constant returns were sign
rather than zero extended (see PR39092). This patch simply adds an explicit
signext to the returns in imm.ll.
Further optimisations for constant materialisation are possible, most notably
for mask-like values which can be generated my loading -1 and shifting right.
A future patch will standardise on the C++ codepath for immediate selection on
RV32 as well as RV64, and then add further such optimisations to
RISCVMatInt::generateInstSeq in order to benefit both RV32 and RV64 for
codegen and li expansion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52962
llvm-svn: 347042
Mark the FREM SelectionDAG node as Expand, which is necessary in order to
support the frem IR instruction on RISC-V. This is expanded into a library
call. Adds the corresponding test. Previously, this would have triggered an
assertion at instruction selection time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54159
Patch by Luís Marques.
llvm-svn: 346958
This extends the .option support from D45864 to enable/disable the relax
feature flag from D44886
During parsing of the relax/norelax directives, the RISCV::FeatureRelax
feature bits of the SubtargetInfo stored in the AsmParser are updated
appropriately to reflect whether relaxation is currently enabled in the
parser. When an instruction is parsed, the parser checks if relaxation is
currently enabled and if so, gets a handle to the AsmBackend and sets the
ForceRelocs flag. The AsmBackend uses a combination of the original
RISCV::FeatureRelax feature bits set by e.g -mattr=+/-relax and the
ForceRelocs flag to determine whether to emit relocations for symbol and
branch diffs. Diff relocations should therefore only not be emitted if the
relax flag was not set on the command line and no instruction was ever parsed
in a section with relaxation enabled to ensure correct diffs are emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46423
Patch by Lewis Revill.
llvm-svn: 346655
A number of intrinsics, such as llvm.sin.f32, would result in a failure to
select. This patch adds expansions for the relevant selection DAG nodes, as
well as exhaustive testing for all f32 and f64 intrinsics.
The codegen for FMA remains a TODO item, pending support for the various
RISC-V FMA instruction variants.
The llvm.minimum.f32.* and llvm.maximum.* tests are commented-out, pending
upstream support for target-independent expansion, as discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-November/127408.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54034
Patch by Luís Marques.
llvm-svn: 346034
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitShift will always zero-extend a shift amount when it
is promoted to the ShiftAmountTy. This results in zero-extension (masking)
which is unnecessary for RISC-V as the shift operations only read the lower 5
or 6 bits (RV32 or RV64).
I initially proposed adding a getExtendForShiftAmount hook so the shift amount
can be any-extended (D52975). @efriedma explained this was unsafe, so I have
instead eliminate the unnecessary and operations at instruction selection time
in a manner similar to X86InstrCompiler.td.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53224
llvm-svn: 344432
The srli test in alu8.ll was a no-op, as it shifted by 8 bits. Fix this, and
also change the immediate in alu16.ll as shifted by something other than a
poewr of 8 is more interesting.
llvm-svn: 343958
f32 values passed on the stack would previously cause an assertion in
unpackFromMemLoc.. This would only trigger in the presence of the F extension
making f32 a legal type. Otherwise the f32 would be legalized.
This patch fixes that by keeping LocVT=f32 when a float is passed on the
stack. It also adds test coverage for this case, and tests that also
demonstrate lw/sw/flw/fsw will be selected when most profitable. i.e. there is
no unnecessary i32<->f32 conversion in registers.
llvm-svn: 343756
Introduce a new RISCVExpandPseudoInsts pass to expand atomic
pseudo-instructions after register allocation. This is necessary in order to
ensure that register spills aren't introduced between LL and SC, thus breaking
the forward progress guarantee for the operation. AArch64 does something
similar for CmpXchg (though only at O0), and Mips is moving towards this
approach (see D31287). See also [this mailing list
post](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099490.html) from
James Knight, which summarises the issues with lowering to ll/sc in IR or
pre-RA.
See the [accompanying RFC
thread](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html) for an
overview of the lowering strategy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47882
llvm-svn: 342534
We cannot directy reuse the patterns of StPat because for some reason the store
DAG node and the atomic_store_nn DAG nodes put the ptr and the value in
different positions. Currently we attempt to store the address to an address
formed by the value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51217
llvm-svn: 340722
There is no way in the universe, that doing a full-width division in
software will be faster than doing overflowing multiplication in
software in the first place, especially given that this same full-width
multiplication needs to be done anyway.
This patch replaces the previous implementation with a direct lowering
into an overflowing multiplication algorithm based on half-width
operations.
Correctness of the algorithm was verified by exhaustively checking the
output of this algorithm for overflowing multiplication of 16 bit
integers against an obviously correct widening multiplication. Baring
any oversights introduced by porting the algorithm to DAG, confidence in
correctness of this algorithm is extremely high.
Following table shows the change in both t = runtime and s = space. The
change is expressed as a multiplier of original, so anything under 1 is
“better” and anything above 1 is worse.
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| Arch | u64*u64 t | u64*u64 s | u128*u128 t | u128*u128 s |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| X64 | - | - | ~0.5 | ~0.64 |
| i686 | ~0.5 | ~0.6666 | ~0.05 | ~0.9 |
| armv7 | - | ~0.75 | - | ~1.4 |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
Performance numbers have been collected by running overflowing
multiplication in a loop under `perf` on two x86_64 (one Intel Haswell,
other AMD Ryzen) based machines. Size numbers have been collected by
looking at the size of function containing an overflowing multiply in
a loop.
All in all, it can be seen that both performance and size has improved
except in the case of armv7 where code size has regressed for 128-bit
multiply. u128*u128 overflowing multiply on 32-bit platforms seem to
benefit from this change a lot, taking only 5% of the time compared to
original algorithm to calculate the same thing.
The final benefit of this change is that LLVM is now capable of lowering
the overflowing unsigned multiply for integers of any bit-width as long
as the target is capable of lowering regular multiplication for the same
bit-width. Previously, 128-bit overflowing multiply was the widest
possible.
Patch by Simonas Kazlauskas!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50310
llvm-svn: 339922
When emitting the difference between two symbols, the standard behavior is
that the difference will be resolved to an absolute value if both of the
symbols are offsets from the same data fragment. This is undesirable on
architectures such as RISC-V where relaxation in the linker may cause the
computed difference to become invalid. This caused an issue when compiling to
object code, where the size of a function in the debug information was already
calculated even though it could change as a consequence of relaxation in the
subsequent linking stage.
This patch inhibits the resolution of symbol differences to absolute values
where the target's AsmBackend has declared that it does not want these to be
folded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45773
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 339864
- Save/restore only registers that are used.
This includes Callee saved registers and Caller saved registers
(arguments and temporaries) for integer and FP registers.
- If there is a call in the interrupt handler, save/restore all
Caller saved registers (arguments and temporaries) and all FP registers.
- Emit special return instructions depending on "interrupt"
attribute type.
Based on initial patch by Zhaoshi Zheng.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rkruppe, the_o, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, rogfer01, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48411
llvm-svn: 338047
Summary:
In r333455 we added a peephole to fix the corner cases that result
from separating base + offset lowering of global address.The
peephole didn't handle some of the cases because it only has a basic
block view instead of a function level view.
This patch replaces that logic with a machine function pass. In
addition to handling the original cases it handles uses of the global
address across blocks in function and folding an offset from LW\SW
instruction. This pass won't run for OptNone compilation, so there
will be a negative impact overall vs the old approach at O0.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, mgrang
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rogfer01, mgorny, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, llvm-commits, edward-jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47857
llvm-svn: 335786
Fences are inserted according to table A.6 in the current draft of version 2.3
of the RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, which incorporates the memory model
changes and definitions contributed by the RISC-V Memory Consistency Model
task group.
Instruction selection failures will now occur for 8/16/32-bit atomicrmw and
cmpxchg operations when targeting RV32IA until lowering for these operations
is added in a follow-on patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47589
llvm-svn: 334591
This patch adds lowering for atomic fences and relies on AtomicExpandPass to
lower atomic loads/stores, atomic rmw, and cmpxchg to __atomic_* libcalls.
test/CodeGen/RISCV/atomic-* are modelled on the exhaustive
test/CodeGen/PPC/atomics-regression.ll, and will prove more useful once RV32A
codegen support is introduced.
Fence mappings are taken from table A.6 in the current draft of version 2.3 of
the RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, which incorporates the memory model changes
and definitions contributed by the RISC-V Memory Consistency Model task group.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47587
llvm-svn: 334590
Summary:
Base and offset are always separated when a GlobalAddress node is lowered
(rL332641) as an optimization to reduce instruction count. However, this
optimization is not profitable if the Global Address ends up being used in only
instruction.
This patch adds peephole optimizations that merge an offset of
an address calculation into the LUI %%hi and ADD %lo of the lowering sequence.
The peephole handles three patterns:
1) ADDI (ADDI (LUI %hi(global)) %lo(global)), offset
--->
ADDI (LUI %hi(global + offset)) %lo(global + offset).
This generates:
lui a0, hi (global + offset)
add a0, a0, lo (global + offset)
Instead of
lui a0, hi (global)
addi a0, hi (global)
addi a0, offset
This pattern is for cases when the offset is small enough to fit in the
immediate filed of ADDI (less than 12 bits).
2) ADD ((ADDI (LUI %hi(global)) %lo(global)), (LUI hi_offset))
--->
offset = hi_offset << 12
ADDI (LUI %hi(global + offset)) %lo(global + offset)
Which generates the ASM:
lui a0, hi(global + offset)
addi a0, lo(global + offset)
Instead of:
lui a0, hi(global)
addi a0, lo(global)
lui a1, (offset)
add a0, a0, a1
This pattern is for cases when the offset doesn't fit in an immediate field
of ADDI but the lower 12 bits are all zeros.
3) ADD ((ADDI (LUI %hi(global)) %lo(global)), (ADDI lo_offset, (LUI hi_offset)))
--->
offset = global + offhi20<<12 + offlo12
ADDI (LUI %hi(global + offset)) %lo(global + offset)
Which generates the ASM:
lui a1, %hi(global + offset)
addi a1, %lo(global + offset)
Instead of:
lui a0, hi(global)
addi a0, lo(global)
lui a1, (offhi20)
addi a1, (offlo12)
add a0, a0, a1
This pattern is for cases when the offset doesn't fit in an immediate field
of ADDI and both the lower 1 bits and high 20 bits are non zero.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos,
niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang
llvm-svn: 333455
Summary:
Set CostPerUse higher for registers that are not used in the compressed
instruction set. This will influence the greedy register allocator to reduce
the use of registers that can't be encoded in 16 bit instructions. This
affects register allocation even when compressed instruction isn't targeted,
we see no major negative codegen impact.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47039
llvm-svn: 333132
Summary:
When lowering global address, lower the base as a TargetGlobal first then
create an SDNode for the offset separately and chain it to the address calculation
This optimization will create a DAG where the base address of a global access will
be reused between different access. The offset can later be folded into the immediate
part of the memory access instruction.
With this optimization we generate:
lui a0, %hi(s)
addi a0, a0, %lo(s) ; shared base address.
addi a1, zero, 20 ; 2 instructions per access.
sw a1, 44(a0)
addi a1, zero, 10
sw a1, 8(a0)
addi a1, zero, 30
sw a1, 80(a0)
Instead of:
lui a0, %hi(s+44) ; 3 instructions per access.
addi a1, zero, 20
sw a1, %lo(s+44)(a0)
lui a0, %hi(s+8)
addi a1, zero, 10
sw a1, %lo(s+8)(a0)
lui a0, %hi(s+80)
addi a1, zero, 30
sw a1, %lo(s+80)(a0)
Which will save one instruction per access.
Reviewers: asb, apazos
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, apazos, asb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46989
llvm-svn: 332641
Alex Bradbury