This goes with r178516, which instructed the analyzer not to inline the
constructors and destructors of C++ container classes. This goes a step
further and does the same thing for iterators, so that the analyzer won't
falsely decide we're trying to construct an iterator pointing to a
nonexistent element.
The heuristic for determining whether something is an iterator is the
presence of an 'iterator_category' member. This is controlled under the
same -analyzer-config option as container constructor/destructor inlining:
'c++-container-inlining'.
<rdar://problem/13770187>
llvm-svn: 180890
This doesn't appear to be the cause of the slowdown. I'll have to try a
manual bisect to see if there's really anything there, or if it's just
the bot itself taking on additional load. Meanwhile, this change helps
with correctness.
This changes an assertion and adds a test case, then re-applies r180638,
which was reverted in r180714.
<rdar://problem/13296133> and PR15863
llvm-svn: 180864
Much of this patch outside of PathDiagnostics.h are just minor
syntactic changes due to the return type for operator* and the like
changing for the iterator, so the real focus should be on
PathPieces itself.
This change is motivated so that we can do efficient insertion
and removal of individual pieces from within a PathPiece, just like
this was a kind of "IR" for static analyzer diagnostics. We
currently implement path transformations by iterating over an
entire PathPiece and making a copy. This isn't very natural for
some algorithms.
We use an ilist here instead of std::list because we want operations
to rip out/insert nodes in place, just like IR manipulation. This
isn't being used yet, but opens the door for more powerful
transformation algorithms on diagnostic paths.
llvm-svn: 180741
This seems to be causing quite a slowdown on our internal analyzer bot,
and I'm not sure why. Needs further investigation.
This reverts r180638 / 9e161ea981f22ae017b6af09d660bfc3ddf16a09.
llvm-svn: 180714
Casts to bool (and _Bool) are equivalent to checks against zero,
not truncations to 1 bit or 8 bits.
This improved reasoning does cause a change in the behavior of the alpha
BoolAssignment checker. Previously, this checker complained about statements
like "bool x = y" if 'y' was known not to be 0 or 1. Now it does not, since
that conversion is well-defined. It's hard to say what the "best" behavior
here is: this conversion is safe, but might be better written as an explicit
comparison against zero.
More usefully, besides improving our model of booleans, this fixes spurious
warnings when returning the address of a local variable cast to bool.
<rdar://problem/13296133>
llvm-svn: 180638
The 2 functions were computing the same location using different logic (each one had edge case bugs that the other
one did not). Refactor them to rely on the same logic.
The location of the warning reported in text/command line output format will now match that of the plist file.
There is one change in the plist output as well. When reporting an error on a BinaryOperator, we use the location of the
operator instead of the beginning of the BinaryOperator expression. This matches our output on command line and
looks better in most cases.
llvm-svn: 180165
The analyzer represents all pointer-to-pointer bitcasts the same way, but
this can be problematic if an implicit base cast gets layered on top of a
manual base cast (performed with reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast).
Fix this (and avoid a valid assertion) by looking through cast regions.
Using reinterpret_cast this way is only valid if the base class is at the
same offset as the derived class; this is checked by -Wreinterpret-base-class.
In the interest of performance, the analyzer doesn't repeat this check
anywhere; it will just silently do the wrong thing (use the wrong offsets
for fields of the base class) if the user code is wrong.
PR15394
llvm-svn: 180052
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
Introduce a new helper function, which computes the first symbolic region in
the base region chain. The corresponding symbol has been used for assuming that
a pointer is null. Now, it will also be used for checking if it is null.
This ensures that we are tracking a null pointer correctly in the BugReporter.
llvm-svn: 179916
The analyzer uses LazyCompoundVals to represent rvalues of aggregate types,
most importantly structs and arrays. This allows us to efficiently copy
around an entire struct, rather than doing a memberwise load every time a
struct rvalue is encountered. This can also keep memory usage down by
allowing several structs to "share" the same snapshotted bindings.
However, /lookup/ through LazyCompoundVals can be expensive, especially
since they can end up chaining back to the original value. While we try
to reuse LazyCompoundVals whenever it's safe, and cache information about
this transitivity, the fact is it's sometimes just not a good idea to
perpetuate LazyCompoundVals -- the tradeoffs just aren't worth it.
This commit changes RegionStore so that binding a LazyCompoundVal to struct
will do a memberwise copy if the struct is simple enough. Today's definition
of "simple enough" is "up to N scalar members" (see below), but that could
easily be changed in the future. This is enough to bring the test case in
PR15697 back down to a manageable analysis time (within 20% of its original
time, in an unfair test where the new analyzer is not compiled with LTO).
The actual value of "N" is controlled by a new -analyzer-config option,
'region-store-small-struct-limit'. It defaults to "2", meaning structs with
zero, one, or two scalar members will be considered "simple enough" for
this code path.
It's worth noting that a more straightforward implementation would do this
on load, not on bind, and make use of the structure we already have for this:
CompoundVal. A long time ago, this was actually how RegionStore modeled
aggregate-to-aggregate copies, but today it's only used for compound literals.
Unfortunately, it seems that we've special-cased LazyCompoundVal in certain
places (such as liveness checks) but failed to similarly special-case
CompoundVal in all of them. Until we're confident that CompoundVal is
handled properly everywhere, this solution is safer, since the entire
optimization is just an implementation detail of RegionStore.
<rdar://problem/13599304>
llvm-svn: 179767
A C++ overloaded operator may be implemented as an instance method, and
that instance method may be called on an rvalue object, which has no
associated region. The analyzer handles this by creating a temporary region
just for the evaluation of this call; however, it is possible that /by
creating the region/, the analyzer ends up in a previously-explored state.
In this case we don't need to continue along this path.
This doesn't actually show any behavioral change now, but it starts being
used with the next commit and prevents an assertion failure there.
llvm-svn: 179766
In the committed example, we now see a note that tells us when the pointer
was assumed to be null.
This is the only case in which getDerefExpr returned null (failed to get
the dereferenced expr) throughout our regression tests. (There were multiple
occurrences of this one.)
llvm-svn: 179736
We always register the visitor on a node in which the value we are tracking is live and constrained. However,
the visitation can restart at a node, later on the path, in which the value is under constrained because
it is no longer live. Previously, we just silently stopped tracking in that case.
llvm-svn: 179731
This was slightly tricky because BlockDecls don't currently store an
inferred return type. However, we can rely on the fact that blocks with
inferred return types will have return statements that match the inferred
type.
<rdar://problem/13665798>
llvm-svn: 179699
When computing the value of ?: expression, we rely on the last expression in
the previous basic block to be the resulting value of the expression. This is
not the case for binary "?:" operator (GNU extension) in C++. As the last
basic block has the expression for the condition subexpression, which is an
R-value, whereas the true subexpression is the L-value.
Note the operator evaluation just happens to work in C since the true
subexpression is an R-value (like the condition subexpression). CFG is the
same in C and C++ case, but the AST nodes are different, which the LValue to
Rvalue conversion happening after the BinaryConditionalOperator evaluation.
Changed the logic to only use the last expression from the predecessor only
if it matches either true or false subexpression. Note, the logic needed
fortification anyway: L and R were passed but not even used by the function.
Also, change the conjureSymbolVal to correctly compute the type, when the
expression is an LG-value.
llvm-svn: 179574
While we don't do anything intelligent with pointers-to-members today,
it's perfectly legal to need a temporary of pointer-to-member type to, say,
pass by const reference. Tweak an assertion to allow this.
PR15742 and PR15747
llvm-svn: 179563
Structs and arrays can take advantage of the single top-level global
symbol optimization (described in the previous commit) just as well
as scalars.
No intended behavioral change.
llvm-svn: 179555
Now that we're invalidating global regions properly, we want to continue
taking advantage of a particular optimization: if all global regions are
invalidated together, we can represent the bindings of each region with
a "derived region value" symbol. Essentially, this lazily links each
global region with a single symbol created at invalidation time, rather
than binding each region with a new symbolic value.
We used to do this, but haven't been for a while; the previous commit
re-enabled this code path, and this handles the fallout.
<rdar://problem/13464044>
llvm-svn: 179554
This fixes a regression where a call to a function we can't reason about
would not actually invalidate global regions that had explicit bindings.
void test_that_now_works() {
globalInt = 42;
clang_analyzer_eval(globalInt == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
invalidateGlobals();
clang_analyzer_eval(globalInt == 42); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
This has probably been around since the initial "cluster" refactoring of
RegionStore, if not longer.
<rdar://problem/13464044>
llvm-svn: 179553
There are few cases where we can track the region, but cannot print the note,
which makes the testing limited. (Though, I’ve tested this manually by making
all regions non-printable.) Even though the applicability is limited now, the enhancement
will be more relevant as we start tracking more regions.
llvm-svn: 179396
Before:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
After:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
The location of the note is already in the caller, not the callee, so this
just brings the "depth" attribute in line with that.
This only affects plist diagnostic consumers (i.e. Xcode). It's necessary
for Xcode to associate the control flow arrows with the right stack frame.
<rdar://problem/13634363>
llvm-svn: 179351
In this code
int getZero() {
return 0;
}
void test() {
int problem = 1 / getZero(); // expected-warning {{Division by zero}}
}
we generate these arrows:
+-----------------+
| v
int problem = 1 / getZero();
^ |
+---+
where the top one represents the control flow up to the first call, and the
bottom one represents the flow to the division.* It turns out, however, that
we were generating the top arrow twice, as if attempting to "set up context"
after we had already returned from the call. This resulted in poor
highlighting in Xcode.
* Arguably the best location for the division is the '/', but that's a
different problem.
<rdar://problem/13326040>
llvm-svn: 179350
Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C
definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is
isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType().
However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of
"integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped
enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right
predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its
elements.
This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the
general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where
it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These
cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>()
plus BuiltinType::isInteger().
isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and
include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-)
Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701>
llvm-svn: 179081
This is important because sometimes two nodes are identical, except the
second one is a sink.
This bug has probably been around for a while, but it wouldn't have been an
issue in the old report graph algorithm. I'm ashamed to say I actually looked
at this the first time around and thought it would never be a problem...and
then didn't include an assertion to back that up.
PR15684
llvm-svn: 178944
This turns on not only destructor inlining, but inlining of constructors
for types with non-trivial destructors. Per r178516, we will still not
inline the constructor or destructor of anything that looks like a
container unless the analyzer-config option 'c++-container-inlining' is
set to 'true'.
In addition to the more precise path-sensitive model, this allows us to
catch simple smart pointer issues:
#include <memory>
void test() {
std::auto_ptr<int> releaser(new int[4]);
} // memory allocated with 'new[]' should not be deleted with 'delete'
<rdar://problem/12295363>
llvm-svn: 178805
Improvement of r178684 and r178685.
Jordan has pointed out that I should not rely on the value of the condition to know which expression branch
has been taken. It will not work in cases the branch condition is an unknown value (ex: we do not track the constraints for floats).
The better way of doing this would be to find out if the current node is the right or left successor of the node
that has the ternary operator as a terminator (which is how this is done in other places, like ConditionBRVisitor).
llvm-svn: 178701
The lifetime of a temporary can be extended when it is immediately bound
to a local reference:
const Value &MyVal = Value("temporary");
In this case, the temporary object's lifetime is extended for the entire
scope of the reference; at the end of the scope it is destroyed.
The analyzer was modeling this improperly in two ways:
- Since we don't model temporary constructors just yet, we create a fake
temporary region when it comes time to "materialize" a temporary into
a real object (lvalue). This wasn't taking base casts into account when
the bindings being materialized was Unknown; now it always respects base
casts except when the temporary region is itself a pointer.
- When actually destroying the region, the analyzer did not actually load
from the reference variable -- it was basically destroying the reference
instead of its referent. Now it does do the load.
This will be more useful whenever we finally start modeling temporaries,
or at least those that get bound to local reference variables.
<rdar://problem/13552274>
llvm-svn: 178697
1) Look for the node where the condition expression is live when checking if
it is constrained to true or false.
2) Fix a bug in ProgramState::isNull, which was masking the problem. When
the expression is not a symbol (,which is the case when it is Unknown) return
unconstrained value, instead of value constrained to “false”!
(Thankfully other callers of isNull have not been effected by the bug.)
llvm-svn: 178684
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when
constructing a CXXConstructorCall.
- If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store.
- Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use
the helper variable that Sema provides.
<rdar://problem/13091608>
llvm-svn: 178602
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
Jordan Rose