For auto-padding assembler support, we'll need to bundle the label with the instructions (nops or call sequences) so that they don't get separated. This just rearranges the code to make the upcoming change more obvious.
This is in advance of assembler padding directives support where we'll need to bundle the label w/the corresponding faulting instruction to avoid padding being inserted between.
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c.
Add new intrinsics
llvm.experimental.constrained.minimum
llvm.experimental.constrained.maximum
as strict versions of llvm.minimum and llvm.maximum.
Includes SystemZ back-end support.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71624
getTargetConstant prevents any optimizations from operating on the
value and basically says its already been iseled. But since we
want the index to be in a register, this isn't true.
Prior to this we were generating a vbroadcast with an immediate
argument which is illegal and was flagged by the expensive checks
bot.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary:
r347747 added support for clustering mem ops with FI base operands
including support for fixed stack objects in shouldClusterFI, but
apparently this was never tested.
This patch fixes shouldClusterFI to work with scaled as well as
unscaled load/store instructions, and fixes the ordering of memory ops
in MemOpInfo::operator< to ensure that memory addresses always
increase, regardless of which direction the stack grows.
Subscribers: MatzeB, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, javed.absar, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71334
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
The caller will assert for nodes with more than 2 results unless
we return a null SDValue.
I tried to test this by copying an AArch64 test for ScalarizeVecOp_FP_ROUND.
While it did hit the assert and this commited fixed that. It also
hit a later problem that couldn't be fixed without adding strict
FP support to AArch64.
This started with adding a test to support get code coverage on
ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP by copying an existing AArch64 test
and using constrained sitofp/uitofp intrinsics.
This found 3 separate issues:
-ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP needs to do its own replacement
because the caller can't handle replacing multiple results.
-Missing integer promotion support for sitofp/uitofp
-Chain result not always assigned in ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP.
Committing them together so I can add the test case.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa4120906,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary:
Right now, DAGCombiner process the nodes in an iplementation defined order. This tends to be fragile as optimisation may or may not kick in depending on the traversal order.
This is part of a larger effort to get the DAGCombiner to process its node in topological order.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70921
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
Summary:
This is a resubmit of D71473.
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71547
Summary:
With DWARF5 it is no longer possible to distinguish normal methods and methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` by just looking at the debug information
as they are both now children of the of the DW_TAG_structure_type that defines them (before only the `__attribute__((objc_direct))` methods were children).
This means that in LLDB we are no longer able to create a correct Clang AST of a module by just looking at the debug information. Instead we would
need to call the Objective-C runtime to see which of the methods have a `__attribute__((objc_direct))` and then add the attribute to our own Clang AST
depending on what the runtime returns. This would mean that we either let the module AST be dependent on the Objective-C runtime (which doesn't
seem right) or we retroactively add the missing attribute to the imported AST in our expressions.
A third option is to annotate methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` as `DW_AT_APPLE_objc_direct` which is what this patch implements. This way
LLDB doesn't have to call the runtime for any `__attribute__((objc_direct))` method and the AST in our module will already be correct when we create it.
Reviewers: aprantl, SouraVX
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71201
It doesn't seem to do anything that SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp can't
do. SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp already handles nodes with a variable
number of arguments and a mix of scalar and vector arguments.
This patch makes it so that cases where multiple instructions that
differ only in their ConstantInt or ConstantFP MachineOperand values no
longer collide. For instance:
%0:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 true
%1:_(s1) = G_CONSTANT i1 false
%2:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 1.0
%3:_(s32) = G_FCONSTANT float 0.0
Prior to this patch the first two instructions would collide together.
Also, the last two G_FCONSTANT instructions would also collide. Now they
will no longer collide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71558
Currently -fuse-init-array option is not effective when target triple
does not specify os, on x86,x86_64.
i.e.
// -fuse-init-array is not honored.
$ clang -target i386 -fuse-init-array test.c -S
// -fuse-init-array is honored.
$ clang -target i386-linux -fuse-init-array test.c -S
This patch fixes first case.
And does cleanup.
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, fhahn, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71360
Summary:
This patch introduces a set of functions to enable deprecation of IRBuilder functions without breaking out of tree clients.
Functions will be deprecated one by one and as in tree code is cleaned up.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473
Summary:
Guard against a potential crash observed in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/32994#issuecomment-524249628
If two branches are collapsed we can encounter a degenerate conditional branch `TBB==FBB`.
The subsequent code assumes that they differ, so we exit out early.
Reviewers: ributzka, spatel
Subscribers: loladiro, dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66657
This refactors the if-statements handling the hashing of various
MachineOperand types into a switch-statement. The purpose is to cover
all the basis for all MachineOperand types while being very deliberate
about which MachineOperand types we are not handling and why (better
added comments). This patch is a NFC redo of https://reviews.llvm.org/D71396.
Much of the changes present in D71396 will come in smaller follow-up patches
that will add support for hashing the MachineOperand types that aren't
covered piece-meal with tests for each new case.
Legalization algorithm is complicated by two facts:
1) While regular instructions should be possible to legalize in
an isolated, per-instruction, context-free manner, legalization
artifacts can only be eliminated in pairs, which could be deeply, and
ultimately arbitrary nested: { [ () ] }, where which paranthesis kind
depicts an artifact kind, like extend, unmerge, etc. Such structure
can only be fully eliminated by simple local combines if they are
attempted in a particular order (inside out), or alternatively by
repeated scans each eliminating only one innermost pair, resulting in
O(n^2) complexity.
2) Some artifacts might in fact be regular instructions that could (and
sometimes should) be legalized by the target-specific rules. Which
means failure to eliminate all artifacts on the first iteration is
not a failure, they need to be tried as instructions, which may
produce more artifacts, including the ones that are in fact regular
instructions, resulting in a non-constant number of iterations
required to finish the process.
I trust the recently introduced termination condition (no new artifacts
were created during as-a-regular-instruction-retrial of artifacts not
eliminated on the previous iteration) to be efficient in providing
termination, but only performing the legalization in full if and only if
at each step such chains of artifacts are successfully eliminated in
full as well.
Which is currently not guaranteed, as the artifact combines are applied
only once and in an arbitrary order that has to do with the order of
creation or insertion of artifacts into their worklist, which is a no
particular order.
In this patch I make a small change to the artifact combiner, making it
to re-insert into the worklist immediate (modulo a look-through copies)
artifact users of each vreg that changes its definition due to an
artifact combine.
Here the first scan through the artifacts worklist, while not
being done in any guaranteed order, only needs to find the innermost
pair(s) of artifacts that could be immediately combined out. After that
the process follows def-use chains, making them shorter at each step, thus
combining everything that can be combined in O(n) time.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, paquette, aemerson, dsanders
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar, paquette
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
and introducing new unittests/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerTest.cpp
relying on it to unit test the entire legalizer algorithm (including the
top-level main loop).
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
In order to make this change, getMemBasePlusOffset() has been extended to
also take a SDNodeFlags parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71206
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows integer constants offsets, but there
are cases where we can use an existing SDValue parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel, craig.topper
Subscribers: craig.topper, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71205
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows positive offsets, but there are cases
where we want to subtract an offset from an existing pointer.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71204
Eric Christopher