Summary:
The resolution of LWG 3199 makes sure that input-streaming into an empty bitset
does not set the failbit on the input stream.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65105
llvm-svn: 369422
Summary:
This is a re-application of r357533 and r357531. They had been reverted
because we thought the commits broke the LLDB data formatters, but it
turns out this was because only r357531 had been included in the CI
run.
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
This effectively implements the wording in p1264r0. It hasn't been voted
into the Standard yet, however there is wide agreement that the fix is
correct and it's just a matter of time before the fix is standardized.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357775
This reverts commits r357533 and r357531, which broke the LLDB
data formatters. I'll hold off until we know how to fix the data
formatters accordingly.
llvm-svn: 357536
Summary:
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
I will submit a paper in San Diego to clarify the Standard such that the
interpretation used in this commit (and other implementations) is the only
possible one.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357531
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
That macro has been defined to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 for many
weeks now, so we're actually replacing uses of it for uses of
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 directly.
This should not change or break anything since the two macros are
100% equivalent, unless somebody is (incorrectly!) relying on
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY being defined.
llvm-svn: 344641
Summary:
The exact same code was replicated 11 times for implementing the basic_istream
input operators (those that don't use numeric_limits). The same code was also
duplicated twice for implementing the basic_istream input operators that take
numeric_limits into account.
This commit factors the common code into function templates to avoid
the duplication.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49808
llvm-svn: 337955
It covers the cases when the sentry object returns false and when an exception
was thrown. Corresponding standard paragraph is C++14 [istream.unformatted]p9:
[...] In any case, if n is greater than zero it then stores a null
character into the next successive location of the array.
rdar://problem/35566567
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40677
llvm-svn: 322326
It covers the cases when the sentry object returns false and when an exception
was thrown. Corresponding standard paragraph is C++14 [istream.unformatted]p21:
In any case, if n is greater than zero, it then stores a null character
(using charT()) into the next successive location of the array.
Patch by Reimar Döffinger.
llvm-svn: 318862
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
Summary:
This patch fixes a number of problems with the visibility macros across GCC (on Unix) and Windows (DLL import/export semantics). All of the visibility macros are now documented under `DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst`. Now I'll no longer forget the subtleties of each!
This patch adds two new visibility macros:
* `_LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS` for controlling the typeinfo of enum types. Only Clang supports this.
* `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS` for redefining visibility on explicit instantiation declarations. Clang and Windows require this.
After applying this patch GCC only emits one -Wattribute warning opposed to 30+.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24602
llvm-svn: 281673
No point in pretending that these methods are hidden - they are
actually exported from libc++.so. Extern template declarations make
them part of libc++ ABI.
This patch does not change libc++.so export list (at least on Linux).
llvm-svn: 255177
Louis Dionne