It covers the cases when the sentry object returns false and when an exception
was thrown. Corresponding standard paragraph is C++14 [istream.unformatted]p9:
[...] In any case, if n is greater than zero it then stores a null
character into the next successive location of the array.
rdar://problem/35566567
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40677
llvm-svn: 322326
An application may determine whether the C standard library is glibc
by testing whether __GLIBC_PREREQ is defined. This breaks if libc++
provides its own definition. Instead, define our own macro in our
namespace with the desired semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41892
llvm-svn: 322201
test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.hpp
When testing MSVC's STL with C1XX, simulate a couple more compiler feature-test macros.
When testing MSVC's STL, simulate a few library feature-test macros.
test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
The vector_size attribute is a non-Standard extension that's supported by Clang and GCC,
but not C1XX. Therefore, guard this with `__has_attribute(vector_size)`.
Additionally, while these tests pass when MSVC's STL is compiled with Clang,
I don't consider this to be a supported scenario for our library,
so also guard this with defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION).
test/std/utilities/function.objects/func.not_fn/not_fn.pass.cpp
N4713 23.14.10 [func.not_fn]/1 depicts only `call_wrapper(call_wrapper&&) = default;`
and `call_wrapper(const call_wrapper&) = default;`. According to
15.8.2 [class.copy.assign]/2 and /4, this makes call_wrapper non-assignable.
Therefore, guard the assignability tests as libc++ specific.
Add a (void) cast to tolerate not_fn() being marked as nodiscard.
Fixes D41213.
llvm-svn: 322144
Seems to have broken some tests since I first wrote this a while
back. Will reland after checking what went wrong with the tests.
This reverts commit 7023194c8d11a081fd01ed25308b3d60193c6a06.
llvm-svn: 322039
Summary:
After rL319736 for D28253 (which fixes PR28929), gcc cannot compile `<memory>` anymore in pre-C+11 modes, complaining:
```
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::make_shared(_A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
```
This is also reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/224946 (FreeBSD is apparently one of the very few projects that regularly builds programs against libc++ with gcc).
The reason is that the static assertions are invoking `is_constructible` with three arguments, while gcc does not have the built-in `is_constructible` feature, and the pre-C++11 `is_constructible` wrappers in `<type_traits>` only provide up to two arguments.
I have added additional wrappers for three arguments, modified the `is_constructible` entry point to take three arguments instead, and added a simple test to is_constructible.pass.cpp.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41805
llvm-svn: 321963
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D41748
* These tests use function objects from functional, back_inserter from iterator, and equal from algorithm, so add those headers.
* The use of iota targeting vector<unsigned char> with an int parameter triggers warnings on MSVC++ assigning an into a unsigned char&; so change the parameter to unsigned char with a static_cast.
* Avoid naming unary_function in identity here as that is removed in '17. (This also fixes naming _VSTD, _NOEXCEPT_, and other libcxx-isms)
* Change the predicate in the transform tests to add_ten so that problems with multiple application are caught.
llvm-svn: 321922
This allows keeping libcxx using win32 threads even if a
version of pthread.h is installed.
This matches the existing cmake option LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_API.
Also add missing documentation about the internal define
_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_WIN32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41764
llvm-svn: 321896
* _VSTD should be std.
* <utility> is needed for forward.
* unary_function is no longer standard (and unnecessary for this, a C++17-only test)
llvm-svn: 321847
Summary:
This warning is already suppressed on non-apple platforms, so
this change just suppresses it on apple as well.
Reviewers: EricWF, lichray
Reviewed By: lichray
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41248
llvm-svn: 321435
As a result of this change, the basic_stringbuf constructor that
takes a mode ends up leaving __hm_ set to 0, causing the comparison
"__hm_ - __str_.data() < __noff" in seekoff() to succeed, which caused
the function to incorrectly return -1. The fix is to account for the
possibility of __hm_ being 0 when computing the distance from __hm_
to the start of the string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319
llvm-svn: 321124
It turns out that this is the only change required in libcxx
for it to compile with the new `wasm32-unknown-unknown-wasm`
target recently added to Clang.
Patch by Nicholas Wilson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41073
llvm-svn: 320925
Summary:
[libcxx] Fix basic_stringbuf constructor
The C++ Standard [stringbuf.cons]p1 defines the effects of the basic_stringbuf
constructor that takes ios_base::openmode as follows:
Effects: Constructs an object of class basic_stringbuf, initializing the
base class with basic_streambuf(), and initializing mode with which.
Postconditions: str() == "".
The default constructor of basic_streambuf shall initialize all its
pointer member objects to null pointers [streambuf.cons]p1.
Currently libc++ calls "str(string_type());" in the aforementioned constructor
setting basic_streambuf's pointers to a non-null value.
This patch removes the call (note that the postcondition str() == ""
remains valid because __str_ is default-initialized) and adds a test checking
that the basic_streambuf's pointers are null after construction.
Thanks Mikhail Maltsev for the patch.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40707
llvm-svn: 320604
Marshall Clow