We just need a way to unpack ArrayRef<ValueHandle> to ArrayRef<Value*>.
No need to expose this to the user.
This reduces the cognitive overhead for the tutorial.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240037425
This CL changes dialect op source files (.h, .cpp, .td) to follow the following
convention:
<full-dialect-name>/<dialect-namespace>Ops.{h|cpp|td}
Builtin and standard dialects are specially treated, though. Both of them do
not have dialect namespace; the former is still named as BuiltinOps.* and the
latter is named as Ops.*.
Purely mechanical. NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 236371358
Expose the result types of edsc::Expr, which are now stored for all types of
Exprs and not only for the variadic ones. Require return types when an Expr is
constructed, if it will ever have some. An empty return type list is
interpreted as an Expr that does not create a value (e.g. `return` or `store`).
Conceptually, all edss::Exprs are now typed, with the type being a (potentially
empty) tuple of return types. Unbound expressions and Bindables must now be
constructed with a specific type they will take. This makes EDSC less
evidently type-polymorphic, but we can still write generic code such as
Expr sumOfSquares(Expr lhs, Expr rhs) { return lhs * lhs + rhs * rhs; }
and use it to construct different typed expressions as
sumOfSquares(Bindable(IndexType::get(ctx)), Bindable(IndexType::get(ctx)));
sumOfSquares(Bindable(FloatType::getF32(ctx)),
Bindable(FloatType::getF32(ctx)));
On the positive side, we get the following.
1. We can now perform type checking when constructing Exprs rather than during
MLIR emission. Nevertheless, this is still duplicates the Op::verify()
until we can factor out type checking from that.
2. MLIREmitter is significantly simplified.
3. ExprKind enum is only used for actual kinds of expressions. Data structures
are converging with AbstractOperation, and the users can now create a
VariadicExpr("canonical_op_name", {types}, {exprs}) for any operation, even
an unregistered one without having to extend the enum and make pervasive
changes to EDSCs.
On the negative side, we get the following.
1. Typed bindables are more verbose, even in Python.
2. We lose the ability to do print debugging for higher-level EDSC abstractions
that are implemented as multiple MLIR Ops, for example logical disjunction.
This is the step 2/n towards making EDSC extensible.
***
Move MLIR Op construction from MLIREmitter::emitExpr to Expr::build since Expr
now has sufficient information to build itself.
This is the step 3/n towards making EDSC extensible.
Both of these strive to minimize the amount of irrelevant changes. In
particular, this introduces more complex pretty-printing for affine and binary
expression to make sure tests continue to pass. It also relies on string
comparison to identify specific operations that an Expr produces.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 234609882
This CL applies the following simplifications to EDSCs:
1. Rename Block to StmtList because an MLIR Block is a different, not yet
supported, notion;
2. Rework Bindable to drop specific storage and just use it as a simple wrapper
around Expr. The only value of Bindable is to force a static cast when used by
the user to bind into the emitter. For all intended purposes, Bindable is just
a lightweight check that an Expr is Unbound. This simplifies usage and reduces
the API footprint. After playing with it for some time, it wasn't worth the API
cognition overhead;
3. Replace makeExprs and makeBindables by makeNewExprs and copyExprs which is
more explicit and less easy to misuse;
4. Add generally useful functionality to MLIREmitter:
a. expose zero and one for the ubiquitous common lower bounds and step;
b. add support to create already bound Exprs for all function arguments as
well as shapes and views for Exprs bound to memrefs.
5. Delete Stmt::operator= and replace by a `Stmt::set` method which is more
explicit.
6. Make Stmt::operator Expr() explicit.
7. Indexed.indices assertions are removed to pave the way for expressing slices
and views as well as to work with 0-D memrefs.
The CL plugs those simplifications with TableGen and allows emitting a full MLIR function for
pointwise add.
This "x.add" op is both type and rank-agnostic (by allowing ArrayRef of Expr
passed to For loops) and opens the door to spinning up a composable library of
existing and custom ops that should automate a lot of the tedious work in
TF/XLA -> MLIR.
Testing needs to be significantly improved but can be done in a separate CL.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 231982325
Similar to op operands and attributes, use DAG to specify operation's results.
This will allow us to provide names and matchers for outputs.
Also Defined `outs` as a marker to indicate the start of op result list.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 231422455
This CL performs a bunch of cleanups related to EDSCs that are generally
useful in the context of using them with a simple wrapping C API (not in this
CL) and with simple language bindings to Python and Swift.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 230066505
This CL fixes a misunderstanding in how to build DimOp which triggered
execution issues in the CPU path.
The problem is that, given a `memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`, the expressions to
construct the dynamic dimensions should be:
`dim %arg, 0 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
`dim %arg, 2 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
and
`dim %arg, 4 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
Before this CL, we wold construct:
`dim %arg, 0 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
`dim %arg, 1 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
`dim %arg, 2 : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>`
and expect the other dimensions to be constants.
This assumption seems consistent at first glance with the syntax of alloc:
```
%tensor = alloc(%M, %N, %O) : memref<?x4x?x8x?xf32>
```
But this was actuallyincorrect.
This CL also makes the relevant functions available to EDSCs and removes
duplication of the incorrect function.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 229622766
This is mostly plumbing to start allowing testing EDSC lowering. Prototype specifying reference implementation using verbose format without any generation/binding support. Add test pass that dumps the constructed EDSC (of which there can only be one). The idea is to enable iterating from multiple sides, this is wrong on many dimensions at the moment.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 229570535
Nicolas Vasilache