conservative.
In particular, this fixes an unwanted corner case.
Before:
string s =
someFunction("aaaa"
"bbbb");
After:
string s = someFunction(
"aaaa"
"bbbb");
llvm-svn: 240129
It was a bit too aggressive.
With this patch, we keep on breaking here:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa,
"aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb");
But don't break in:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa("aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb"));
llvm-svn: 240024
In essence this is meant to consistently indent multiline strings by a
fixed amount of spaces from the start of the line. Don't do this in
cases where it wouldn't help anyway.
Before:
someFunction(aaaaa,
"aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
After:
someFunction(aaaaa, "aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
llvm-svn: 240004
Before:
int c = []() -> int *{ return 2; }();
After:
int c = []() -> int * { return 2; }();
Based on patch by James Dennett (http://reviews.llvm.org/D10410), thank you!
llvm-svn: 239600
The following example used to crash clang-format.
#define a\
/**/}
Adjusting the indentation level cache for the line starting with the
comment would lead to an out-of-bounds array read.
llvm-svn: 239521
Before clang-format would e.g. add a space into
#define Q_FOREACH(x, y)
which turns this into a non-function-like macro.
Patch by Strager Neds, thank you!
llvm-svn: 239513
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
instead of BinPackParameters. Braced lists are used as constructor
calls in many places and so the bin-packing should follow what is done
for other calls and not what is done for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 238184
This fixes a case where the column limit was incorrectly calculated
leading to a macro like this:
#define A \
[] { \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); \
}
exceeding the column limit.
llvm-svn: 238182
"void (*my_function)(void)" should become "void (*my_function) (void)" when
SpaceBeforeParens is set to 'Always'
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9835
llvm-svn: 237704
Before:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator I =
Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
After:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator
I = Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
This fixes llvm.org/PR23544.
llvm-svn: 237688
Before:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.
aaaaaaaa];
After:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaa];
This merely papers over the fact that we aren't parsing ObjC method calls
correctly. Also, the indentation is weird.
llvm-svn: 237681
Before:
class C : test {
class D : test{void f(){int i{2};
}
}
;
}
;
After:
class C : test {
class D : test {
void f() { int i{2}; }
};
};
llvm-svn: 237569
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
Generally, clang-format tries to keep label-value pairs on a single
line for stream operators. However, we should not do that if there is
just a single such pair, as that doesn't help much.
Before:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa);
Also remove old test case that was testing actual behavior any more.
llvm-svn: 237535
comments. At some point, we might to want to a layout with a different
number of columns instead, but at the moment, this causes more
confusion than it's worth.
llvm-svn: 237427
before binary/ternary operators.
Basically, it doesn't seem right to indent a nested block aligned to a
binary or ternary operator.
Before:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
After:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
llvm-svn: 237263
Summary:
a) Pull out a class LevelIndentTracker whose responsibility is to keep track
of the indent of levels across multiple annotated lines.
b) Put all responsibility for merging lines into the LineJoiner; make the
LineJoiner iterate over the lines so we never operate on a line that might
be merged later; this makes the interface safer to use.
c) Move formatting of the end-of-file whitespace into formatFirstToken.
Fix bugs that became obvious after the refactoring:
1. We would not format lines with offsets correctly inside nested blocks if
only the outer expression was affected:
int x = s({ // clang-format only this line
class X {
public:
// ^ this starts at the non-modified indnent level; previously we would
// not fix this, now we correctly outdent it.
void f();
};
});
2. We would incorrectly align comments across lines that do not have comments
for lines with nested blocks:
int expression; // with comment
int x = s({
int y; // comment
int z; // we would incorrectly align this comment with the comment on
// 'expression'
});
llvm-svn: 237104
Specifically, calculate the deviation between the shortest and longest
element (which is used to prevent excessive whitespace) per column, not
overall. This automatically handles the corner cases of a single column
and a single row so that the actualy implementation becomes simpler.
Before:
vector<int> x = {1,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
2,
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb,
3,
cccccccccccccccccccccc};
After:
vector<int> x = {1, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
2, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb,
3, cccccccccccccccccccccc};
llvm-svn: 236992
Some compilers ignore everything after a semicolon in such inline asm
blocks and thus, the closing brace must not be moved to the previous
line.
llvm-svn: 236946
In particular:
* If the difference between the longest and shortest element, we copped
out of column format completely. Now, we instead allow to arrange
these in a single column, essentially enforcing a one-per-line format.
* Allow column layout even if there are braced lists. Especially, if
there are many short lists, this can be beneficial. The bad case,
where there is a long nested init list is usually caught as we now
limit the length difference of the longest and shortest element.
llvm-svn: 236851
Before:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:
aaaaaaaa aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
After:
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaa
aaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa];
Note that this might now violate the column limit and we probably need an
alternative way of indenting these then. However, that is still strictly better
than the messy formatting that clang-format did before.
llvm-svn: 236598
In the process, fix an old todo that I don't really know how to write
tests for. The problem is that Clang's lexer creates very strange token
sequences for these. However, the new approach seems generally better
and easier to read so I am submitting it nonetheless.
llvm-svn: 236589
Splitting:
/**
* multiline block comment
*
*/
Before:
/**
* multiline block
*comment
*
*/
After:
/**
* multiline block
* comment
*
*/
The reason was that the empty line inside the comment (with just the "*") was
confusing the comment breaking logic.
llvm-svn: 236573
In Objective-C some style guides use a style where assignment operators are
aligned, in an effort to increase code readability. This patch adds an option
to the format library which allows this functionality. It is disabled by
default for all the included styles, so it must be explicitly enabled.
The option will change code such as:
- (void)method {
NSNumber *one = @1;
NSNumber *twentyFive = @25;
}
to:
- (void)method {
NSNumber *one = @1;
NSNumber *twentyFive = @25;
}
Patch by Matt Oakes. Thank you!
Accidentally reformatted all the tests...
llvm-svn: 236100
This is now obvious as the pointer alignment behavior was changed.
Before (even with pointer alignment "Left"):
MACRO Constructor(const int &i) : a(a), b(b) {}
After:
MACRO Constructor(const int& i) : a(a), b(b) {}
llvm-svn: 235301
spacing also fixed by r230473.
The fix in r230473 was done to enable fixing the spacing for
std::function<void( int, int )>.
I did not realized that it also fixed this
issue. Since it is fairly different from
Deleted &operator=(const Deleted &)& = default;
fixed in r230473, it seems sensible to add the regression test for it.
Also cleaned up the test by removing duplicated code and comment, and kept
repeated test set consistent.
Result of running the new tests with r230473 backed out:
[ RUN ] FormatTest.ConfigurableSpacesInParentheses
Actual: "std::function<void(int, int)> callback;"
Expected: "std::function<void( int, int )> callback;"
Actual: "std::function<void( int, int )> callback;"
Expected: "std::function<void(int, int)> callback;"
Actual: "std::function<void( int, int ) > callback;"
Expected: "std::function<void(int, int)> callback;"
[ FAILED ] FormatTest.ConfigurableSpacesInParentheses (402 ms)
Result of new tests with r230473:
[ RUN ] FormatTest.ConfigurableSpacesInParentheses
[ OK ] FormatTest.ConfigurableSpacesInParentheses (209 ms)
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7922
Patch by Jean-Philippe Dufraigne. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 232632
There was already a TODO to double-check whether the extra indenation
makes sense. A slightly different case reveals that it is actively harmful:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
Here (and it is probably not a totally infrequent case, it just works out that
"i < " is four spaces and so the four space extra indentation makes the
operator precedence confusing. So, this will now instead be formatted
as:
for (int i = 0; i < aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ||
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb < ccccccccccccccc;
++i) {
}
llvm-svn: 231461
With incomplete code, we aren't guaranteed to generated changes for
every token. In that case, we need to assume that even the very first
change can continue a preprocessor directive and initialize values
accordingly.
llvm-svn: 231066
Seems like the most consistent thing to do and in multi-var DeclStmts,
it is especially important to point out that the */& bind to the
identifier.
llvm-svn: 230903
Before:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // +1 indent weird.
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
After:
Aaaa aaaaaaaaaaa{
{
a, // better!?
b, // trailing comma signals one per line.
}, // trailing comma signals one per line.
};
Interesting that this apparently was entirely untested :-(.
llvm-svn: 230627
Daniel Jasper