Summary:
D61491 caused us to use relocs when they're not strictly necessary, to
refer to symbols in the text section. This is a pessimization and it's a
problem for some loaders that don't support relocs yet.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65813
llvm-svn: 370667
SGPR spills aren't really handled after SILowerSGPRSpills. In order to
directly control what happens if the scavenger needs to spill, the
scavenger needs to be used directly. There is an alternative to
spilling in these contexts anyway since the frame register can be
increment and restored.
This does present another possible issue if spilling is needed for the
unused carry out if an add is needed. I think this can be avoided by
using a scalar add (although that clobbers SCC, which happens anyway).
llvm-svn: 370281
This is a special case because one node maps to two different G_
instructions, and the operand order is changed.
This mostly enables G_FCMP for AMDPGPU. G_ICMP is still manually
selected for now since it has the SALU and VALU complication to deal
with.
llvm-svn: 370280
This reduces the number of SGPRs due to some concerns about running
out of SGPRs if you make all the SGPRs that aren't reserved available
for the calling convention.
Change-Id: Idb4ca4dc72f5b6808cb524ff7270915a8de5b4c1
llvm-svn: 370215
Copied directly from the IR version.
Most of the testcases I've added for this are somewhat problematic
because they really end up testing the yet to be implemented version
for MUL_I24/MUL_U24.
llvm-svn: 370099
(-X) * (-Y) + Z --> X * Y + Z
This is a missing optimization that shows up as a potential regression in D66050,
so we should solve it first. We appear to be partly missing this fold in IR as well.
We do handle the simpler case already:
(-X) * (-Y) --> X * Y
And it might be beneficial to make the constraint less conservative (eg, if both
operands are cheap, but not necessarily cheaper), but that causes infinite looping
for the existing fmul transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66755
llvm-svn: 370071
Fix typos. Use Hi and Lo prefixes for Or instead of LHS and RHS
to match names of surrounding variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66587
llvm-svn: 370062
The problem these are supposed to work around can occur before the
intrinsics are lowered into the nodes. Try to directly simplify them
so they are matched before the bit assert operations can be optimized
out.
llvm-svn: 369994
The mul24 matching could interfere with SLSR and the other addressing
mode related passes. This probably is not the optimal placement, but
is an intermediate step. This should probably be moved after all the
generic IR passes, particularly LSR. Moving this after LSR seems to
help in some cases, and hurts others.
As-is in this patch, in idiv-licm, it saves 1-2 instructions inside
some of the loop bodies, but increases the number in others. Moving
this later helps these loops. In the new lsr tests in
mul24-pass-ordering, the intrinsic prevents introducing more
instructions in the loop preheader, so moving this later ends up
hurting them. This shouldn't be any worse than before the intrinsics
were introduced in r366094, and LSR should probably be smarter. I
think it's because it doesn't know the and inside the loop will be
folded away.
llvm-svn: 369991
Checking all the instructions will help catch LICM changes when passes
are reordered. Also switch to using gfx9 since global stores make the
relevant instructions more obvious.
llvm-svn: 369855
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
Summary:
Add support for gfx10, where all DPP operations are confined to work
within a single row of 16 lanes, and wave32.
Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, jfb, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65644
llvm-svn: 369745
The x86 tests are now broken (in paticular add-scalar.ll now hits the
DAG fallback) due to not handling G_UADDO. The DAG x86 backend has a
custom lowering for this, so that will need to be implemented.
llvm-svn: 369673
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 369664
This is necessary for handling <3 x s16> on AMDGPU, assuming this
should be handled as 2 separate legalization actions. The alternative
would be for fewerElementsVector to handle 3->2.
llvm-svn: 369547
When running tests on windows, invoking "llc -march=<arch>" will
implicitly use windows as the target os, making these tests misbehave
after this change.
Fix the issue by using more specific -mtriple values instead of plain
-march in these tests.
This should hopefully fix buildbot failures like
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc/builds/9816.
llvm-svn: 369443
That change (r363670) could leave a copy from vgpr to sgpr. Fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66133
Change-Id: I00c3fe6fda2e8e1e36f53195b881b1449c777ea4
llvm-svn: 368736
This pass is a port of the according pass from the HSAIL compiler.
It parses printf calls and setup runtime printf buffer.
After that it copies printf arguments to the buffer and fills in
module metadata for runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24035
llvm-svn: 368592
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368339
D62198 introduced an option to relax the checks for
hasOnlyUniformBranches. This commit turns the option on by default, for
better code generation in some cases in AMDGPU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63198
Change-Id: I9cbff002a1e74d3b7eb96b4192dc8129936d537d
llvm-svn: 368042
Summary:
This is a follow up to r367237. MachineFunction::getMachineMemOperand()
adds the offset parameter to the existing offset instead of resetting it.
So we need to reset the offset to the correct value after calling this
function.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65557
llvm-svn: 367881
This was switching to use a format store for a non-format store for
f16 types. Also fixes i16/f16 stores on targets without legal f16.
The corresponding loads also need to be fixed.
llvm-svn: 367872
Without context we assume SGPR. Allowing VGPR constants theoretically
helps avoid a copy. This seems to not actually work now, and the
choice isn't based on the use bank.
llvm-svn: 367871
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.
Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.
llvm-svn: 367755
Jay Foad