The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
The TargetSchedModel is always initialized using the TargetSubtargetInfo's
MCSchedModel and TargetInstrInfo, so we don't need to extract those and
pass 3 parameters to init().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44789
llvm-svn: 329540
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
performing a zext of a register.
On the PR there is discussion of how to more effectively handle this,
but this patch prevents us from miscompiling code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37504
llvm-svn: 312620
The primary thing that this accomplishes is to allow future re-use of
these routines in more contexts and clarify the behavior w.r.t. loops.
For example, if handling outer loops is desirable, doing so in
a inside-out order becomes straight forward because it walks the loop
nest itself (rather than walking the function's basic blocks) and
de-couples the CMOV rewriting from the loop structure as there isn't
actually anything loop-specific about this transformation.
This patch should be essentially a no-op. It potentially changes the
order in which we visit the inner loops, but otherwise should merely set
the stage for subsequent changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36783
llvm-svn: 311225
Resolved PR33954.
This patch contains two more constraints that aim to reduce the noise cases where we convert CMOV into branch for small gain, and end up spending more cycles due to overhead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36081
llvm-svn: 310352
LLVM compiler recognizes opportunities to transform a branch into IR select instruction(s) - later it will be lowered into X86::CMOV instruction, assuming no other optimization eliminated the SelectInst.
However, it is not always profitable to emit X86::CMOV instruction. For example, branch is preferable over an X86::CMOV instruction when:
1. Branch is well predicted
2. Condition operand is expensive, compared to True-value and the False-value operands
In CodeGenPrepare pass there is a shallow optimization that tries to convert SelectInst into branch, but it is not enough.
This commit, implements machine optimization pass that converts X86::CMOV instruction(s) into branch, based on a conservative heuristic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34769
llvm-svn: 308142
Nicola Zaghen