We should have maxprot == initprot for all non-i386 architectures, which
is what ld64 does.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89420
The previous approach of adding up the file sizes of the
component sections ignored the fact that the sections did not have to be
contiguous in the file. As such, it was underestimating the true size.
I discovered this issue because `codesign` checks whether `__LINKEDIT`
extends to the end of the file. Since we were underestimating segment
sizes, this check failed.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84574
Summary:
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D81326#2093931, I'm not sure it
makes sense to use the default target triple to determine -arch.
Long-term we should probably detect it from the input object files, but
in the meantime it would be nice not to have to add it to all our tests
by using a convenient default.
Reviewers: #lld-macho
Subscribers: arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81983
Summary: After {D81326} landed, some tests started failing if they did
not have `-arch` specified. I think one of the reasons happened was due
to the fact that we were taking a reference to a temporary value that
was freed too early. Fixing that got the error to go away on my local
Linux machine.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81802
Use the default target triple configured by the user to determine the
default architecture for `ld64.lld`. Stash the architecture in the
configuration as when linking against TBDs, we will need to filter out
the symbols based upon the architecture. Treat the Haswell slice as it
is equivalent to `x86_64` but with the extra Haswell extensions (e.g.
AVX2, FMA3, BMI1, etc). This will make it easier to add new
architectures in the future.
This change also changes the failure mode where an invalid `-arch`
parameter will result in the linker exiting without further processing.
That's what ld64 uses for 64-bit targets. I figured it's best to make
this change sooner rather than later since a bunch of our tests are
relying on hardcoded addresses that depend on this value.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80177
Previously, the special segments `__PAGEZERO` and `__LINKEDIT` were
implemented as special LoadCommands. This diff implements them using
special sections instead which have an `isHidden()` attribute. We do not
emit section headers for hidden sections, but we use their addresses and
file offsets to determine that of their containing segments. In addition
to allowing us to share more segment-related code, this refactor is also
important for the next step of emitting dylibs:
1) dylibs don't have segments like __PAGEZERO, so we need an easy way of
omitting them w/o messing up segment indices
2) Unlike the kernel, which is happy to run an executable with
out-of-order segments, dyld requires dylibs to have their segment
load commands arranged in increasing address order. The refactor
makes it easier to implement sorting of sections and segments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76839
Summary:
This is the first commit for the new Mach-O backend, designed to roughly
follow the architecture of the existing ELF and COFF backends, and
building off work that @ruiu and @pcc did in a branch a while back. Note
that this is a very stripped-down commit with the bare minimum of
functionality for ease of review. We'll be following up with more diffs
soon.
Currently, we're able to generate a simple "Hello World!" executable
that runs on OS X Catalina (and possibly on earlier OS X versions; I
haven't tested them). (This executable can be obtained by compiling
`test/MachO/relocations.s`.) We're mocking out a few load commands to
achieve this -- for example, we can't load dynamic libraries, but
Catalina requires binaries to be linked against `dyld`, so we hardcode
the emission of a `LC_LOAD_DYLIB` command. Other mocked out load
commands include LC_SYMTAB and LC_DYSYMTAB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75382