We tried to provide a very nice diagnostic when diagnosing an assignment
to a const int & produced by a function call. However, we cannot always
determine what function was called.
This fixes PR24568.
llvm-svn: 246014
Adds parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for array sections in OpenMP constructs (introduced in OpenMP 4.0).
Currently it is allowed to use array sections only in OpenMP clauses that accepts list of expressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10732
llvm-svn: 245937
The problem is that the arguments are of TheCall are reset later
to the ones in Args, making TypoExpr put back. Some TypoExpr that have
already been diagnosed and will assert later in Sema::getTypoExprState
llvm-svn: 245560
Remove the assumption of a Boolean type by checking if an expression is known
to have a boolean value. Disable warning in two other tests.
llvm-svn: 245507
This has been disabled for a long time, but:
1) Initializers work (and apparently they're re reason why this was disabled).
2) various tests happen to hit this code path and the invariant seems to be
always verified.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12110
Reviewed by: rsmith
llvm-svn: 245404
The z13 vector facility has an associated language extension,
closely modeled on AltiVec/VSX. The main differences are:
- vector long, vector float and vector pixel are not supported
- vector long long and vector double are supported (like VSX)
- comparison operators return a vector rather than a scalar integer
- shift operators behave like the OpenCL shift operators
- vector bool is only supported as argument to certain operators;
some operators allow mixing a bool with a non-bool vector
This patch adds clang support for the extension. It is closely modelled
on the AltiVec support. Similarly to the -faltivec option, there's a
new -fzvector option to enable the extensions (as well as an -mzvector
alias for compatibility with GCC). There's also a separate LangOpt.
The extension as implemented here is intended to be compatible with
the -mzvector extension recently implemented by GCC.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11001
llvm-svn: 243642
There is currently no support in MSVC for using i128 as an integer
literal suffix. In fact, there appears to be no evidence that they have
ever supported this feature in any of their compilers. This was an over
generalization of their actual feature and is a nasty source of bugs.
Why is it a source of bugs? Because most code in clang expects that
evaluation of an integer constant expression won't give them something
that 'long long' can't represent. Instead of providing a meaningful
feature, i128 gives us cute ways of exploding the compiler.
llvm-svn: 243243
to consider the storage size of the vector instead of its
sizeof. In other words, ban <3 x int> to <4 x int> casts,
which produced invalid IR anyway.
Also, attempt to be a little more rigorous, or at least
explicit, about when enums are allowed in these casts.
rdar://21901132
llvm-svn: 243069
-fapple-kext is an exception because calls will still go through
the vtable in that mode. Add a note to make the user aware of that.
PR: 23215
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10935
llvm-svn: 242246
If the variable is marked as private in OpenMP construct, the reference to this variable should not keep type qualifiers for the original variable. Private copy is not volatile or constant, so we can use unqualified type for private copy.
llvm-svn: 242133
The Objective-C common-type computation had a few problems that
required a significant rework, including:
- Quadradic behavior when finding the common base type; now it's
linear.
- Keeping around type arguments when computing the common type
between a specialized and an unspecialized type
- Introducing redundant protocol qualifiers.
Part of rdar://problem/6294649. Also fixes rdar://problem/19572837 by
addressing a longstanding bug in
ASTContext::CollectInheritedProtocols().
llvm-svn: 241544
When messaging a method that was defined in an Objective-C class (or
category or extension thereof) that has type parameters, substitute
the type arguments for those type parameters. Similarly, substitute
into property accesses, instance variables, and other references.
This includes general infrastructure for substituting the type
arguments associated with an ObjCObject(Pointer)Type into a type
referenced within a particular context, handling all of the
substitutions required to deal with (e.g.) inheritance involving
parameterized classes. In cases where no type arguments are available
(e.g., because we're messaging via some unspecialized type, id, etc.),
we substitute in the type bounds for the type parameters instead.
Example:
@interface NSSet<T : id<NSCopying>> : NSObject <NSCopying>
- (T)firstObject;
@end
void f(NSSet<NSString *> *stringSet, NSSet *anySet) {
[stringSet firstObject]; // produces NSString*
[anySet firstObject]; // produces id<NSCopying> (the bound)
}
When substituting for the type parameters given an unspecialized
context (i.e., no specific type arguments were given), substituting
the type bounds unconditionally produces type signatures that are too
strong compared to the pre-generics signatures. Instead, use the
following rule:
- In covariant positions, such as method return types, replace type
parameters with “id” or “Class” (the latter only when the type
parameter bound is “Class” or qualified class, e.g,
“Class<NSCopying>”)
- In other positions (e.g., parameter types), replace type
parameters with their type bounds.
- When a specialized Objective-C object or object pointer type
contains a type parameter in its type arguments (e.g.,
NSArray<T>*, but not NSArray<NSString *> *), replace the entire
object/object pointer type with its unspecialized version (e.g.,
NSArray *).
llvm-svn: 241543
Objective-C type arguments can be provided in angle brackets following
an Objective-C interface type. Syntactically, this is the same
position as one would provide protocol qualifiers (e.g.,
id<NSCopying>), so parse both together and let Sema sort out the
ambiguous cases. This applies both when parsing types and when parsing
the superclass of an Objective-C class, which can now be a specialized
type (e.g., NSMutableArray<T> inherits from NSArray<T>).
Check Objective-C type arguments against the type parameters of the
corresponding class. Verify the length of the type argument list and
that each type argument satisfies the corresponding bound.
Specializations of parameterized Objective-C classes are represented
in the type system as distinct types. Both specialized types (e.g.,
NSArray<NSString *> *) and unspecialized types (NSArray *) are
represented, separately.
llvm-svn: 241542
Regular function calls (such as to cabs()) run into the same problem
with handling dependent exprs, not just builtins with custom type
checking.
Fixes PR23775.
llvm-svn: 240443
Currently if the variable is captured in captured region, capture record for this region stores reference to this variable for future use. But we don't need to provide the reference to the original variable if it was explicitly marked as private in the 'private' clause of the OpenMP construct, this variable is replaced by private copy.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9550
llvm-svn: 240377
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Summary:
This modifies Clang to reflect that under pre-C99 ISO C, decimal
constants may have type `unsigned long` even if they do not contain `u`
or `U` in their suffix (C90 subclause 6.1.3.2 paragraph 5). The same is
done for C++ without C++11 which--because of undefined behaviour--allows
for behaviour compatible with ISO C90 in the case of an unsuffixed
decimal literal and is otherwise identical to C90 in its treatment of
integer literals (C++03 subclause 2.13.1 [lex.icon] paragraph 2).
Messages are added to the `c99-compat` and `c++11-compat` groups to warn
on such literals, since they behave differently under the newer
standards.
Fixes PR 16678.
Test Plan:
A new test file is added to exercise both pre-C99/C++11 and C99/C++11-up
on decimal literals with no suffix or suffixes `l`/`L` for both 32-bit
and 64-bit `long`.
In the file, 2^31 (being `INT_MAX+1`) is tested for the expected type
using `__typeof__` and multiple declarations of the same entity. 2^63
is similarly tested when it is within the range of `unsigned long`.
Preprocessor arithmetic tests are added to ensure consistency given
that Clang (like GCC) uses greater than 32 bits for preprocessor
arithmetic even when `long` and `unsigned long` is 32 bits and a
pre-C99/C++11 mode is in effect.
Tests added:
test/Sema/PR16678.c
Reviewers: fraggamuffin, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9794
llvm-svn: 239356
We catch most of the various other __fp16 implicit conversions to
float, but not this one:
__fp16 a;
int i;
...
a += i;
For which we used to generate something 'fun' like:
%conv = sitofp i32 %i to float
%1 = tail call i16 @llvm.convert.to.fp16.f32(float %conv)
%add = add i16 %0, %1
Instead, when we have an __fp16 LHS and an integer RHS, we should
use float as the result type.
While there, add a bunch of missing tests for mixed
__fp16/integer expressions.
llvm-svn: 238625
Add a check for bool-like conversions for the condition expression of
conditional operators. This is similiar to the checking of condition
expressions of if statements, for-loops, while-loops, and do-while loops.
Specificially, this is to fix the problem of assert("message") not triggering
-Wstring-conversion when the assert macro uses a conditional operator.
llvm-svn: 237856
Previously we were setting LangOptions::GNUInline (which controls whether we
use traditional GNU inline semantics) if the language did not have the C99
feature flag set. The trouble with this is that C++ family languages also
do not have that flag set, so we ended up setting this flag in C++ modes
(and working around it in a few places downstream by also checking CPlusPlus).
The fix is to check whether the C89 flag is set for the target language,
rather than whether the C99 flag is cleared. This also lets us remove most
CPlusPlus checks. We continue to test CPlusPlus when deciding whether to
pre-define the __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ macro for consistency with GCC.
There is a change in semantics in two other places
where we weren't checking both CPlusPlus and GNUInline
(FunctionDecl::doesDeclarationForceExternallyVisibleDefinition and
FunctionDecl::isInlineDefinitionExternallyVisible), but this change seems to
put us back into line with GCC's semantics (test case: test/CodeGen/inline.c).
While at it, forbid -fgnu89-inline in C++ modes, as GCC doesn't support it,
it didn't have any effect before, and supporting it just makes things more
complicated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9333
llvm-svn: 237299
Modules builds fundamentally have a non-linear macro history. In the interest
of better source fidelity, represent the macro definition information
faithfully: we have a linear macro directive history within each module, and at
any point we have a unique "latest" local macro directive and a collection of
visible imported directives. This also removes the attendent complexity of
attempting to create a correct MacroDirective history (which we got wrong
in the general case).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 236176
Previously we'd try to perform checks on the captures from the middle of
parsing the lambda's body, at the point where we detected that a variable
needed to be captured. This was wrong in a number of subtle ways. In
PR23334, we couldn't correctly handle the list of potential odr-uses
resulting from the capture, and our attempt to recover from that resulted
in a use-after-free.
We now defer building the initialization expression until we leave the lambda
body and return to the enclosing context, where the initialization does the
right thing. This patch only covers lambda-expressions, but we should apply
the same change to blocks and captured statements too.
llvm-svn: 235921
"multiple methods named '<selector>' found" warning by noting
the method that is actualy used. It also cleans up and refactors
code in this area and selects a method that matches actual arguments
in case of receiver being a forward class object.
rdar://19265430
llvm-svn: 235023
Previously, many error messages would simply be "read-only variable is not
assignable" This change provides more information about why the variable is
not assignable, as well as note to where the const is located.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4479
llvm-svn: 234677
This warns when using decls that are not available on all deployment targets.
For example, a call to
- (void)ppartialMethod __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.8)));
will warn if -mmacosx-version-min is set to less than 10.8.
To silence the warning, one has to explicitly redeclare the method like so:
@interface Whatever(MountainLionAPI)
- (void)ppartialMethod;
@end
This way, one cannot accidentally call a function that isn't available
everywhere. Having to add the redeclaration will hopefully remind the user
to add an explicit respondsToSelector: call as well.
Some projects build against old SDKs to get this effect, but building against
old SDKs suppresses some bug fixes -- see http://crbug.com/463171 for examples.
The hope is that SDK headers are annotated well enough with availability
attributes that new SDK + this warning offers the same amount of protection
as using an old SDK.
llvm-svn: 232750
Now that SmallString is a first-class citizen, most SmallString::str()
calls are not required. This patch removes a whole bunch of them, yet
there are lots more.
There are two use cases where str() is really needed:
1) To use one of StringRef member functions which is not available in
SmallString.
2) To convert to std::string, as StringRef implicitly converts while
SmallString do not. We may wish to change this, but it may introduce
ambiguity.
llvm-svn: 232622
The original commit failed to handle "shift assign" (<<=), which
broke the test mentioned in r228406. This is now fixed and the
test added to the lit tests under SemaOpenCL.
*** Original commit message from r228382 ***
OpenCL: handle shift operator with vector operands
Introduce a number of checks:
1. If LHS is a scalar, then RHS cannot be a vector.
2. Operands must be of integer type.
3. If both are vectors, then the number of elements must match.
Relax the requirement for "usual arithmetic conversions":
When LHS is a vector, a scalar RHS can simply be expanded into a
vector; OpenCL does not require that its rank be lower than the LHS.
For example, the following code is not an error even if the implicit
type of the constant literal is "int".
char2 foo(char2 v) { return v << 1; }
Consolidate existing tests under CodeGenOpenCL, and add more tests
under SemaOpenCL.
llvm-svn: 230464
Alexey Bataev