The semantics pass currently checks for several constraints
that apply to the use of whole assumed-size arrays in various
contexts, but C1002 wasn't really implemented. This patch
implements C1002 by disallowing the use of whole assumed-size
arrays in expressions and variables unless specifically
allowed by the context. This centralizes the error reporting,
which has been improved with a link to the array's declaration.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88691
This patch fix the device_num and device_type clauses used in the init clause. device_num was not
spelled correctly in the parser and was to restrictive with scalarIntConstantExpr instead of scalarIntExpr.
device_type is now taking a list of ScalarIntExpr.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88571
Currently Flang uses TextDiagnostic, TextDiagnosticPrinter &
TestDiagnosticBuffer classes from Clang (more specifically, from
libclangFrontend). This patch introduces simplified equivalents of these
classes in Flang (i.e. it removes the dependency on libclangFrontend).
Flang only needs these diagnostics classes for the compiler driver
diagnostics. This is unlike in Clang in which similar diagnostic classes
are used for e.g. Lexing/Parsing/Sema diagnostics. For this reason, the
implementations introduced here are relatively basic. We can extend them
in the future if this is required.
This patch also enhances how the diagnostics are printed. In particular,
this is the diagnostic that you'd get _before_ the changes introduced here
(no text formatting):
```
$ bin/flang-new
error: no input files
```
This is the diagnostic that you get _after_ the changes introduced here
(in terminals that support it, the text is formatted - bold + red):
```
$ bin/flang-new
flang-new: error: no input files
```
Tests are updated accordingly and options related to enabling/disabling
color diagnostics are flagged as supported by Flang.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi, CarolineConcatto
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87774
Represent FINAL subroutines in the symbol table entries of
derived types. Enforce constraints. Update tests that have
inadvertent violations or modified messages. Added a test.
The specific procedure distinguishability checking code for generics
was used to enforce distinguishability of FINAL procedures.
(Also cleaned up some confusion and redundancy noticed in the
type compatibility infrastructure while digging into that area.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88613
SAVE statement, according to 8.6.14, must apply to the same scoping
unit, that excludes nested scoping units. For example, if the SAVE
statement is found in a MODULE, the functions contained in that module
should not inherit the SAVE attribute. I think that the code was doing
this, failing the following source:
```
MODULE pippo
SAVE
CONTAINS
PURE FUNCTION fft_stick_index( )
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: fft_stick_index
INTEGER :: mc !error: A pure subprogram may not have a variable with the SAVE attribute
END FUNCTION
END MODULE
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88279
1. Section 2.5 : Parallel Construct
2. Section 2.7.1 : Loop Construct
3. Section 2.7.2 : Sections Construct
4. Section 2.7.3 : Single Construct
5. Section 2.7.4 : Workshare Construct
6. Section 2.8.1 : Simd Construct
7. Section 2.8.3 : Loop Simd Construct
8. Section 2.9.1 : Task Construct
9. Section 2.9.2 : Taskloop Construct
10. Section 2.9.3 : Taskloop Simd Construct
Most of the test cases added as part of this change contains semantic errors except few cases which are semantically correct but thrown a semantic error.
Currently flang is not throwing the errors for these cases and throwing semantic errors for the following correct test cases
{omp-do03.f90 , omp-loop-simd01.f90 , omp-simd02.f90 , omp-taskloop01.f90}
Hence, all the test cases are marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87908
Hew more closely to the C17 standard; perform macro replacement
of arguments to function-like macros unless they're being stringified
or pasted. Test with a model "assert" macro idiom that exposed
the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87650
According to section 9.4.1, paragraph 3,
If the starting point is greater than the ending point, the substring has
length zero
But the compilers code for substring processing was failing a call to `CHECK()`
in this case. I fixed this by just setting the number of items in the
resulting string to 0 for this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87799
C-style /*comments*/ are removed during preprocessing directive
tokenization, but Fortran !comments need to be specifically
allowed.
Fixes LLVM bugzilla 47466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87638
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Also, once I corrected the bad dereference, the compiler was putting out
misleading error messages. The underlying error us due to violating section
7.5.10, paragraph 4, which states:
A structure constructor shall not appear before the referenced type is
defined.
I fixed this by testing to see if a type that is used in a structure
constructor is forward referenced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Change the analyzed form of type-bound assignment to match that of call
statements. Resolve the binding name to a specific subprogram when
possible by using `GetBindingResolution`. Otherwise leave it as a
type-bound procedure call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87541
Integer case values were being compared as unsigned by operator<
on evaluate::value::Integer. Change that to signed so that overlap
can be detected correctly.
Explicit CompareUnsigned and BLT are still available if unsigned
comparison is needed.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87595
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Summary:
This is the first patch implementing the new Flang driver as outlined in [1],
[2] & [3]. It creates Flang driver (`flang-new`) and Flang frontend driver
(`flang-new -fc1`). These will be renamed as `flang` and `flang -fc1` once the
current Flang throwaway driver, `flang`, can be replaced with `flang-new`.
Currently only 2 options are supported: `-help` and `--version`.
`flang-new` is implemented in terms of libclangDriver, defaulting the driver
mode to `FlangMode` (added to libclangDriver in [4]). This ensures that the
driver runs in Flang mode regardless of the name of the binary inferred from
argv[0].
The design of the new Flang compiler and frontend drivers is inspired by it
counterparts in Clang [3]. Currently, the new Flang compiler and frontend
drivers re-use Clang libraries: clangBasic, clangDriver and clangFrontend.
To identify Flang options, this patch adds FlangOption/FC1Option enums.
Driver::printHelp is updated so that `flang-new` prints only Flang options.
The new Flang driver is disabled by default. To enable it, set
`-DBUILD_FLANG_NEW_DRIVER=ON` when configuring CMake and add clang to
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` (e.g. -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=“clang;flang;mlir”).
[1] “RFC: new Flang driver - next steps”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000470.html
[2] “RFC: Adding a fortran mode to the clang driver for flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062669.html
[3] “RFC: refactoring libclangDriver/libclangFrontend to share with Flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066393.html
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG6bf55804924d5a1d902925ad080b1a2b57c5c75c
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Reviewed By: richard.barton.arm, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089
When we define a derived type that extends another derived type, we can then
create a structure constructor that contains values for the fields of both the
child type and its parent. The compiler's internal representation of that
value contains the name of the parent type where a component name would
normally appear. This caused an assert during contant folding.
There are three cases for components that appear in structure constructors.
The first is the normal case of a component appearing in a structure
constructor for its type.
The second is a component of the parent (or grandparent) type appearing in a
structure constructor for the child type.
The third is the parent type component, which can appear in the structure
constructor of its child.
There are also cases where the component can be arrays.
I created the test case folding12.f90 that covers all of these cases and
modified the code to handle them.
Most of my changes were to the "Find()" method of the type
"StructureConstructor" where I added code to cover the second and third cases
described above. To handle these cases, I needed to create a
"StructureConstructor" for the parent type component and return it. To handle
returning a newly created "StructureConstructor", I changed the return type of
"Find()" to be "std::optional" rather than an ordinary pointer.
This change supersedes D86172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87151
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
These are owned by an instance of a new class AllCookedSources.
This removes the need for a Scope to own a string containing
a module's cooked source stream, and will enable errors to be
emitted when parsing module files in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86891
The DumpSymbolsSources() routine ordered its output by the addresses
of the names of the symbols, and was susceptible to variation across
environments. Fixed by using a multimap using the values of the names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87035
Fixed some version information in flang/f18:
- fixed the behavior of the -v switch: this flag enables verbosity with used with arguments, but just displays the version when used alone (related to this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46017)
- added __FLANG, __FLANG_MAJOR__, __FLANG_MINOR__ and __FLANG_PATCHLEVEL__ (similar to their __F18* counterparts) for compatibility purpose
Reviewed By: AlexisPerry, richard.barton.arm, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84334
Don't use just 128-bit integer as the type for integer
CASE statement constants. Use the actual type of the
literal constants that appeared.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86875
Conformance checking of the shapes of the operands of
array expressions can't, of course, always be done at
compilation time; but when the shapes are known and
nonconformable, we should catch the errors that we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86887
Change the expression representation TypeParamInquiry from being
a class that's templatized on the integer KIND of its result into
a monomorphic representation that results in a SubscriptInteger
that can then be converted.
This is a minor simplification, but it's worth doing because
it is believed to also be a work-around for bugs in the MSVC
compiler with overload resolution that affect the expression
traversal framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86551
Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:
i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200) i
200 format (I8)
end if
write(6, 200) i
end
x.f90:6:9: Label '200' is not in scope
write(6, 200) i
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whereas branch targets must conform to the Clause 11.1.2.1 program
requirement "Transfer of control to the interior of a block from
outside the block is prohibited, ...", this doesn't apply to format
statement references.
This patch fix the prasing for the gang-arg values for the gang clause. It also adds
some clause validity tests for the loop construct.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86584
The tile clause in OpenACC 3.0 imposes some restriction. Element in the tile size list are either * or a
constant positive integer expression. If there are n tile sizes in the list, the loop construct must be immediately
followed by n tightly-nested loops.
This patch implement these restrictions and add some tests.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86655
A number of I/O syntax rules involve variables that will be written to,
and must therefore be definable. This includes internal file variables,
IOSTAT= and IOMSG= specifiers, most INQUIRE statement specifiers, a few
other specifiers, and input variables. This patch checks for
these violations, and implements several additional I/O TODO constraint
checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86557
When an illegal character appears in Fortran source (after
preprocessing), catch and report it in the prescanning phase
rather than leaving it for the parser to cope with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86553
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
If the label field is empty, and macro replacement occurs,
the rescanned text might be misclassified as a comment card
if it happens to begin with a C or a D. Insert a leading
space into these otherwise empty label fields.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
A specification expression can reference an implicitly declared variable
in the host procedure. Because we have to process specification parts
before execution parts, this may be the first time we encounter the
variable. We were assuming the variable was implicitly declared in the
scope where it was encountered, leading to an error because local
variables may not be referenced in specification expressions.
The fix is to tentatively create the implicit variable in the host
procedure because that is the only way the specification expression can
be valid. We mark it with the flag `ImplicitOrError` to indicate that
either it must be implicitly defined in the host (by being mentioned in
the execution part) or else its use turned out to be an error.
We need to apply the implicit type rules of the host, which requires
some changes to implicit typing.
Variables in common blocks are allowed to appear in specification expressions
(because they are not locals) but the common block definition may not appear
until after their use. To handle this we create common block symbols and object
entities for each common block object during the `PreSpecificationConstruct`
pass. This allows us to remove the corresponding code in the main visitor and
`commonBlockInfo_.curr`. The change in order of processing causes some
different error messages to be emitted.
Some cleanup is included with this change:
- In `ExpressionAnalyzer`, if an unresolved name is encountered but
no error has been reported, emit an internal error.
- Change `ImplicitRulesVisitor` to hide the `ImplicitRules` object
that implements it. Change the interface to pass in names rather
than having to get the first character of the name.
- Change `DeclareObjectEntity` to have the `attrs` argument default
to an empty set; that is the typical case.
- In `Pre(parser::SpecificationPart)` use "structured bindings" to
give names to the pieces that make up a specification-part.
- Enhance `parser::Unwrap` to unwrap `Statement` and `UnlabeledStatement`
and make use of that in PreSpecificationConstruct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86322
This patch fix the usage of the wait-argument in a clause and add several tests and fix the unparsing of
the wait-argument.
Reviewed By: sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86325
When we report an error for a bad character kind, don't keep it in the
`DeclTypeSpec`. Otherwise there could be further problems. In this case,
`ComputeOffsets()` got an assertion error because we didn't recognize
`CHARACTER(*,8)` as needing a descriptor because of the bad kind.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86357
When a procedure name was used on the RHS of an assignment we were not
reporting the error. When one was used in an expression the error
message wasn't very good (e.g. "Operands of + must be numeric; have
INTEGER(4) and untyped").
Detect these cases in ArgumentAnalyzer and emit better messages,
depending on whether the named procedure is a function or subroutine.
Procedure names may appear as actual arguments to function and
subroutine calls so don't report errors in those cases. That is the same
case where assumed type arguments are allowed, so rename `isAssumedType_`
to `isProcedureCall_` and use that to decide if it is an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86107
As with use-associated symbols, copy the attributes and flags from the
original symbol onto host-associated symbols when they are created.
This was showing up as an error on a deallocate of a host-associated
name. We reported an error because the symbol didn't have the POINTER
or ALLOCATABLE attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85763
This adds a test for D85862 to ensure that preprocessor definitions
passed on command lines don't regress in future.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85967
OpenACC combined construct can have an optional end directive. This patch handle this
case in the parsing/unparsing with a canonicalization step. Unlike OmpEndLoopDirective,
this doesn't need a special treatment in the pre-fir tree as there is no clause attached to
a AccEndCombinedDirective.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84481
The shape (esp. the size) of the result of a call to TRANSFER
is implemented according to the definition in the standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85866
Character literal substrings used as arguments were causing asserts. This
happened when the code was trying to get the DynamicType of the substring. We
were only recording the DynamicType of the Designator on which the substring
was based. For character literal substrings, the Designator was a character
literal, and we weren't handling getting its type.
I fixed this by changing the `GetType()` method for `DynamicType` to check to
see if we were getting the type of a `Substring` and calculating the type of
the substring by getting the number of bytes in an element of the string.
I also changed the test `resolve49.f90` with some tests, one of which causes
the original crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85908
If an unrestricted specific intrinsic function name is first encountered
as an actual argument, it should be interpreted as an object entity,
not a procedure entity.
Fix some tests that depended on the previous interpretation by adding
explicit INTRINSIC statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85792
Allow compiler directives in the implicit-part and before USE statements
in the specification-part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85693
peter klausler