driven by TAI to being static, driven by tblgen. This means that a
target doesn't get impacted by this stuff at all if it doesn't opt
into it.
llvm-svn: 78427
The use case is if you have a wrapper class:
class Base {
void *Ptr;
public:
Base() : Ptr(0) { }
operator bool() const { return Ptr; }
.....
}
and sub-wrappers that have exactly the same size:
class Sub : public Base {
public:
....
static bool classof(const Base*);
}
and in the code you would do:
void f(Base b) {
Sub sub = dyn_cast<Sub>(b);
if (sub) {
....
}
}
llvm-svn: 78424
I can clean this up a bit more and do way with the TheCondState and just use
the top element on the TheCondStack if not empty. Also may tweak the code
around ParseConditionalAssemblyDirectives() to simplify the AsmParser code.
llvm-svn: 78423
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=78127, I'm changing the
ExecutionEngine's global mappings to hold AssertingVH<const GlobalValue>. That
way, if unregistering a mapping fails to actually unregister it, we'll get an
assert. Running the jit nightly tests didn't uncover any actual instances of
the problem.
This also uncovered the fact that AssertingVH<const X> didn't work, so I fixed
that too.
llvm-svn: 78400
LoopDependenceAnalysis::getLoops is currently O(N*M) for a loop-nest of
depth N and a compound SCEV of M atomic SCEVs. As both N and M will
typically be very small, this should not be a problem. If it turns out
to be one, rewriting getLoops as SCEVVisitor will reduce complexity to
O(M).
llvm-svn: 78394
- Still not very sane, but a least its not 60k lines on X86. :)
- In terms of correctness, currently some things are hard wired for X86, and we
still don't properly resolve ambiguities (this is ignoring the instructions
we don't even match due to funny .td stuff or other corner cases).
The high level changes:
1. Represent tokens which are significant for matching explicitly as separate
operands. This uniformly handles not only the instruction mnemonic, but
also 'signficiant' syntax like the '*' in "call * ...".
2. Separate the matching of operands to an instruction from the construction of
the MCInst. In theory this can be done during matching, but since the number
of variations is small I think it makes sense to decompose the problems.
3. Improved a few of the mechanisms to at least successfully flatten / tokenize
the assembly strings for PowerPC and ARM.
4. The comment at the top of AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp explains the approach I'm
moving towards for handling ambiguous instructions. The high-bit is to infer
a partial ordering of the operand classes (and force the user to specify one
if we can't) and use that to resolve ambiguities.
llvm-svn: 78378
Chris Lattner