Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper 9012028738 [X86] Don't use GR64 register 'and with immediate' instructions if the immediate is zero in the upper 33-bits or upper 57-bits. Use GR32 instructions instead.
Previously the patterns didn't have high enough priority and we would only use the GR32 form if the only the upper 32 or 56 bits were zero.

Fixes PR23100.

llvm-svn: 234075
2015-04-04 02:08:20 +00:00
Tim Northover 277066ab43 X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs.
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..

rdar://problem/13496295

llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-01 18:53:31 +00:00
Tim Northover e94a518a22 IR: add a second ordering operand to cmpxhg for failure
The syntax for "cmpxchg" should now look something like:

	cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 3 acquire monotonic

where the second ordering argument gives the required semantics in the case
that no exchange takes place. It should be no stronger than the first ordering
constraint and cannot be either "release" or "acq_rel" (since no store will
have taken place).

rdar://problem/15996804

llvm-svn: 203559
2014-03-11 10:48:52 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi fc613f4d61 llvm/test/CodeGen/X86: Unmark them out of XFAIL:cygming, in atomic{32|64}.ll and handle-move.ll, corresponding to r178549.
This reverts r176808, r176798, and r177914.

llvm-svn: 178583
2013-04-02 22:35:08 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi 8c0d63c120 llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic{32|64}.ll: Unmark them out of XFAIL:win32.
I know it is incorrect and they'd fail with +Asserts for win32 targets, though.
I'll try to fix them tonight.

llvm-svn: 177914
2013-03-25 21:07:53 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi 1e02e73c30 Suppress atomic(32|64).ll as XFAIL on win32 codegen. Investigating.
llvm-svn: 176798
2013-03-11 08:39:48 +00:00
Michael Liao da22b30be5 Fix PR15355
- Clear 'mayStore' flag when loading from the atomic variable before the
  spin loop
- Clear kill flag from one use to multiple use in registers forming the
  address to that atomic variable
- don't use a physical register as live-in register in BB (neither entry
  nor landing pad.) by copying it into virtual register

(patch by Cameron Zwarich)

llvm-svn: 176538
2013-03-06 00:17:04 +00:00
Michael Liao 3237662b65 Re-work X86 code generation of atomic ops with spin-loop
- Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the
  following issue:
  * Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop

    previously the spin-loop looks like

        thisMBB:
        newMBB:
          ld  t1 = [bitinstr.addr]
          op  t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val]
          not t3 = t2  (if Invert)
          mov EAX = t1
          lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3  [EAX is implicit]
          bz  newMBB
          fallthrough -->nextMBB

    the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop
    as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into
    EAX. This loop is refined as:

        thisMBB:
          EAX = LOAD [MI.addr]
        mainMBB:
          t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX
          LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined]
          JNE mainMBB
        sinkMBB:

  * Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has
    all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand.

  * Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction
    td

  * Fix issues in PR13458

- Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types.
  NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality.

- Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated.

llvm-svn: 164281
2012-09-20 03:06:15 +00:00