a) x86-64 TLS has been documented
b) the code path should use movq for the correct relocation
to be generated.
I've also added a fixme for the test case that we should improve
the code generated, it should look something like is documented
in the tls abi document.
llvm-svn: 192631
Per original comment, the intention of this loop
is to go ahead and break the critical edge
(in order to sink this instruction) if there's
reason to believe doing so might "unblock" the
sinking of additional instructions that define
registers used by this one. The idea is that if
we have a few instructions to sink "together"
breaking the edge might be worthwhile.
This commit makes a few small changes
to help better realize this goal:
First, modify the loop to ignore registers
defined by this instruction. We don't
sink definitions of physical registers,
and sinking an SSA definition isn't
going to unblock an upstream instruction.
Second, ignore uses of physical registers.
Instructions that define physical registers are
rejected for sinking, and so moving this one
won't enable moving any defining instructions.
As an added bonus, while virtual register
use-def chains are generally small due
to SSA goodness, iteration over the uses
and definitions (used by hasOneNonDBGUse)
for physical registers like EFLAGS
can be rather expensive in practice.
(This is the original reason for looking at this)
Finally, to keep things simple continue
to only consider this trick for registers that
have a single use (via hasOneNonDBGUse),
but to avoid spuriously breaking critical edges
only do so if the definition resides
in the same MBB and therefore this one directly
blocks it from being sunk as well.
If sinking them together is meant to be,
let the iterative nature of this pass
sink the definition into this block first.
Update tests to accomodate this change,
add new testcase where sinking avoids pipeline stalls.
llvm-svn: 192608
When if converting something like:
true:
... = R0<kill>
false:
... = R0<kill>
then the instructions of the true block must not have a <kill> flag
anymore, as the instruction of the false block follow and do still read
the R0 value.
Specifically this patch determines the set of register live-in in the
false block (possibly after simulating the liveness changes of the
duplicated instructions). Each of these live-in registers mustn't be
killed.
llvm-svn: 192482
This should fix the buildbots.
Original commit message:
[DAGCombiner] Slice a big load in two loads when the element are next to each
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192476
This reverts r192454
Apparently FileCheck isn't as smart as I though and does not enforce a
topological order between variable defs+uses.
llvm-svn: 192472
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192471
For NVPTX, this fixes a crash where the emitImplicitDef implementation was expecting physical registers,
while NVPTX uses virtual registers (with a couple of exceptions). Now, the implicit def comment will be
emitted as a true PTX register name. Other targets can use this to customize the output of implicit def
comments.
Fixes PR17519
llvm-svn: 192444
When a ConstantExpr which uses a thread local is part of a PHI node
instruction, the insruction that replaces the ConstantExpr must
be inserted in the predecessor block, in front of the terminator instruction.
If the predecessor block has multiple successors, the edge is first split.
llvm-svn: 192432
We can't enable the verifier for tests with SI_IF and SI_ELSE, because
these instructions are always followed by a COPY which copies their
result to the next basic block. This violates the machine verifier's
rule that non-terminators can not folow terminators.
Reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune<vljn at ovi.com>
llvm-svn: 192366
Including following 14 instructions:
4 ld1 insts: load multiple 1-element structure to sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
ld2/ld3/ld4: load multiple N-element structure to sequential N registers (N=2,3,4).
4 st1 insts: store multiple 1-element structure from sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
st2/st3/st4: store multiple N-element structure from sequential N registers (N = 2,3,4).
llvm-svn: 192361
Including following 14 instructions:
4 ld1 insts: load multiple 1-element structure to sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
ld2/ld3/ld4: load multiple N-element structure to sequential N registers (N=2,3,4).
4 st1 insts: store multiple 1-element structure from sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
st2/st3/st4: store multiple N-element structure from sequential N registers (N = 2,3,4).
llvm-svn: 192352
When we had a sequence like:
s1 = VLDRS [r0, 1], Q0<imp-def>
s3 = VLDRS [r0, 2], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
s0 = VLDRS [r0, 0], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
s2 = VLDRS [r0, 4], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
we were gathering the {s0, s1} loads below the s3 load. This is fine,
but confused the verifier since now the s3 load had Q0<imp-use> with
no definition above it.
This should mark such uses <undef> as well. The liveness structure at
the beginning and end of the block is unaffected, and the true sN
definitions should prevent any dodgy reorderings being introduced
elsewhere.
rdar://problem/15124449
llvm-svn: 192344
Substantial SelectionDAG scheduling is going away soon, and is
interfering with Hao's attempts to implement LDn/STn instructions, so
I say we make the leap first.
There were a few reorderings (inevitably) which broke some tests. I
tried to replace them with CHECK-DAG variants mostly, but some too
complex for that to be useful and I just reordered them.
llvm-svn: 192282
Nick Lewycky