Summary:
The validity of ABI/CPU pairs is no longer checked on the fly but is
instead checked after initialization. As a result, invalid CPU/ABI pairs
can be reported as being known but invalid instead of being unknown. For
example, we now emit:
error: ABI 'n32' is not supported on CPU 'mips32r2'
instead of:
error: unknown target ABI 'n64'
Reviewers: atanasyan
Subscribers: sdardis, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21023
llvm-svn: 272645
The exit-on-error flag in the ARM test is necessary in order to avoid an
unreachable in the DAGTypeLegalizer, when trying to expand a physical register.
We can also avoid this situation by introducing a bitcast early on, where the
invalid scalar-to-vector conversion is detected.
We also add a test for PowerPC, which goes through a similar code path in the
SelectionDAGBuilder.
Fixes PR27765.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21061
llvm-svn: 272644
PlatformRemoteAppleTV to check the target.exec-search-paths
directories for files after looking in the SDK. An additional
wrinkle is that the remote file path may be something like
".../UIFoundation.framework/UIFoundation" and in
target.exec-search-paths we will have "UIFoundation.framework".
Looking for just the filename of the path is not sufficient -
we need to also look for it by the parent directories because
this may be a darwin bundle/framework like the UIFoundation
example.
We really need to make a PlatformRemoteAppleDevice and have
PlatformRemoteiOS, PlatformRemoteAppleWatch, and PlatformRemoteAppleTV
inherit from it. These three classes are 98% identical code.
<rdar://problem/25976619>
llvm-svn: 272635
Summary:
This patch implements the variadic `lock_guard` paper.
Making `lock_guard` variadic is a ABI breaking change because the specialization `lock_guard<_Mutex>` mangles differently then when it was the primary template. This change only provides variadic `lock_guard` in ABI V2 or when `_LIBCPP_ABI_VARIADIC_LOCK_GUARD` is defined.
Note that in ABI V2 `lock_guard` must always be declared as a variadic template, even in C++03, in order to keep the ABI consistent. For this reason `lock_guard` is forward declared as a variadic template in all standard dialects and therefore depends on variadic templates being provided as an extension in C++03. All supported versions of Clang and GCC provide this extension.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: K-ballo, mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21260
llvm-svn: 272634
Summary:
system_error::message() uses `strerror` for the generic and system categories. This function is not thread safe.
The fix is to use `strerror_r`. It has been available since 2001 for GNU libc and since BSD 4.4 on FreeBSD/OS X.
On platforms with GNU libc the extended version is used which always returns a valid string, even if an error occurs.
In single-threaded builds `strerror` is still used.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25598
Reviewers: majnemer, mclow.lists
Subscribers: erik65536, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20903
llvm-svn: 272633
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28100.
In r266561 when I implemented allowing explicit specializations of function templates to override deleted status, I mistakenly assumed (and hence introduced a violable assertion) that when an explicit specialization was being declared, the corresponding specialization of the most specialized function template that it would get linked to would always be the one that was implicitly generated - and so if it was marked as 'deleted' it must have inherited it from the primary template and so should be safe to reset its deleted status, and set it to being an explicit specialization. Obviously during redeclaration of a deleted explicit specialization, in order to avoid a recursive reset, we need to check that the previous specialization is not an explicit specialization (instead of assuming and asserting it) and that it hasn't been referenced, and so only then is it safe to reset its 'deleted' status.
All regression tests pass.
Thanks to Zhendong Su for reporting the bug and David Majnemer for tracking it to my commit r266561, and promptly bringing it to my attention.
llvm-svn: 272631
Support certain MS pragmas right after the closing curly brace of a
class. Clang did not expect __pragma in this position.
This fixes PR28094.
llvm-svn: 272628
If definition of default function argument uses itself, clang crashed,
because corresponding function parameter is not associated with the default
argument yet. With this fix clang emits appropriate error message.
This change fixes PR28105.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21301
llvm-svn: 272623
What happened here is that in the new PM there is a bunch of new copying
(actually, moving) and so this reads the HasProfileData member in
situations where it used to not be read.
It used to only be read strictly in the "runOnFunction" method and its
callees, where is *is* initialized (even after my patch).
So this ends up being benign as far as functional behavior of the
compiler (since we set HasProfileData in the "runImpl" method before we
ever make decisions based on it).
It's awesome that UBSan caught this. It highlights one more thing to
watch out for when porting passes.
Sanitizer bot log was:
-- Testing: 17049 tests, 32 threads --
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80..
FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll (15184 of 17049)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/opt < /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll -jump-threading -S | /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/opt < /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll -passes=jump-threading -S | /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.h:90:57: runtime error: load of value 136, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
#0 0x2c33ba1 in llvm::JumpThreadingPass::JumpThreadingPass(llvm::JumpThreadingPass&&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.h:90:57
#1 0x2bc88e4 in void llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>::addPass<llvm::JumpThreadingPass>(llvm::JumpThreadingPass) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:282:40
#2 0x2bb2682 in llvm::PassBuilder::parseFunctionPassName(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>&, llvm::StringRef) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def:133:1
#3 0x2bb4914 in llvm::PassBuilder::parseFunctionPassPipeline(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>&, llvm::StringRef&, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp:489:12
#4 0x2bb6f81 in llvm::PassBuilder::parsePassPipeline(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module>&, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp:674:10
#5 0x986690 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::tool_output_file*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:85:8
#6 0x9af25e in main /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:468:12
#7 0x7fd7e27dbf44 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21f44)
#8 0x960157 in _start (/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x960157)
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line: /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
--
********************
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 128.90s
********************
Failing Tests (1):
LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
Expected Passes : 16725
Expected Failures : 129
Unsupported Tests : 194
Unexpected Failures: 1
llvm-svn: 272616
The need for all these Lookup* functions is just because of calls to
getAnalysis inside methods (i.e. not at the top level) of the
runOnFunction method. They should be straightforward to clean up when
the old PM is gone.
llvm-svn: 272615
pointer-to-pointer representing the parameter. An aggregate rvalue representing
a pointer does not make sense.
We got away with this weirdness because CGCall happens to blindly load an
RValue in aggregate form in this case, without checking whether an RValue for
the type should be in scalar or aggregate form.
llvm-svn: 272609
This reverts commit r272603 and adds a fix.
Big thanks to Davide for pointing me at r216244 which gives some insight
into how to fix this VS2013 issue. VS2013 can't synthesize a move
constructor. So the fix here is to add one explicitly to the
JumpThreadingPass class.
llvm-svn: 272607
I've tested this locally with VS2015 and there are no issues there,
so this might be a VS2013 specific issue.
Thanks to Davide for the suggested fix.
llvm-svn: 272601
The tests in ``fuzzer-traces-hooks.test`` only work on Linux because calls to hooks
(e.g. ``__sanitizer_weak_hook_memcmp()``) from inside the sanitizer
runtime are only implemented on Linux. Therefore these tests are set to
only run on Linux.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21253
llvm-svn: 272600
This follows the approach in r263208 (for GVN) pretty closely:
- move the bulk of the body of the function to the new PM class.
- expose a runImpl method on the new-PM class that takes the IRUnitT and
pointers/references to any analyses and use that to implement the
old-PM class.
- use a private namespace in the header for stuff that used to be file
scope
llvm-svn: 272597
Save machine function pointer so that
the reference does not need to be passed around.
This also gives other methods access to machine
function for information such as entry count etc.
llvm-svn: 272594
Daniel Sanders