This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
llvm-svn: 300032
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments.
The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070
llvm-svn: 299949
Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.
llvm-svn: 299925
LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.
The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.
- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.
These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.
llvm-svn: 299888
Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.
Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070
llvm-svn: 299699
This moves it to the iterator facade utilities giving it full random
access semantics, etc. It can also now be used with standard algorithms
like std::all_of and std::any_of and range adaptors like llvm::reverse.
Also make the semantics of iterating match what every other iterator
uses and forbid decrementing past the begin iterator. This was used as
a hacky way to work around iterator invalidation. However, every
instance trying to do this failed to actually avoid touching invalid
iterators despite the clear documentation that the removed and all
subsequent iterators become invalid including the end iterator. So I've
added a return of the next iterator to removeCase and rewritten the
loops that were doing this to correctly follow the iterator pattern of
either incremneting or removing and assigning fresh values to the
iterator and the end.
In one case we were trying to go backwards to make this cleaner but it
doesn't actually work. I've made that code match the code we use
everywhere else to remove cases as we iterate. This changes the order of
cases in one test output and I moved that test to CHECK-DAG so it
wouldn't care -- the order isn't semantically meaningful anyways.
llvm-svn: 298791
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
While woring on mapping attributes in the C API, it clearly appeared that the recent changes in the API on the C++ side left Function and Call/Invoke with an attribute API that grew in an ad hoc manner. This makes it difficult to work with it, because one doesn't know which overloads exists and which do not.
Make sure that getter/setter function exists for both enum and string version. Remove inconsistent getter/setter, unless they have many callsites.
This should make it easier to work with attributes in the future.
This doesn't change how attribute works.
Reviewers: bkramer, whitequark, mehdi_amini, void
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21514
llvm-svn: 281019
In order to make the optimizer smarter about using the 'returned' argument
attribute (generally, but motivated by my llvm.noalias intrinsic work), add a
utility function to Call/InvokeInst, and CallSite, to make it easy to get the
returned call argument (when one exists).
P.S. There is already an unfortunate amount of code duplication between
CallInst and InvokeInst, and this adds to it. We should probably clean that up
separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22204
llvm-svn: 275031
Summary: As per title. This completes the C API Attribute support.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21365
llvm-svn: 272811
We neglected to transfer operand bundles for some transforms. These
were found via inspection, I'll try to come up with some test cases.
llvm-svn: 268011
This is part of solving PR27344:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27344
CGP should undo the SimplifyCFG transform for the same reason that earlier patches have used this
same mechanism: it's possible that passes between SimplifyCFG and CGP may be able to optimize the
IR further with a select in place.
For the TLI hook default, >99% taken or not taken is chosen as the default threshold for a highly
predictable branch. Even the most limited HW branch predictors will be correct on this branch almost
all the time, so even a massive mispredict penalty perf loss would be overcome by the win from all
the times the branch was predicted correctly.
As a follow-up, we could make the default target hook less conservative by using the SchedMachineModel's
MispredictPenalty. Or we could just let targets override the default by implementing the hook with that
and other target-specific options. Note that trying to statically determine mispredict rates for
close-to-balanced profile weight data is generally impossible if the HW is sufficiently advanced. Ie,
50/50 taken/not-taken might still be 100% predictable.
Finally, note that this patch as-is will not solve PR27344 because the current __builtin_unpredictable()
branch weight default values are 4 and 64. A proposal to change that is in D19435.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19488
llvm-svn: 267572
Summary: eq imply [u|s]ge and [u|s]le are true.
Remove redundant logic by implementing isImpliedFalseByMatchingCmp(Pred1, Pred2)
as isImpliedTrueByMatchingCmp(Pred1, getInversePredicate(Pred2)).
llvm-svn: 267177
Summary: [u|s]gt and [u|s]lt imply [u|s]ge and [u|s]le are true, respectively.
I've simplified the existing tests and added additional tests to cover the new
cases mentioned above. I've also added tests for all the cases where the
first compare doesn't imply anything about the second compare.
llvm-svn: 267171
EarlyCSE had inconsistent behavior with regards to flag'd instructions:
- In some cases, it would pessimize if the available instruction had
different flags by not performing CSE.
- In other cases, it would miscompile if it replaced an instruction
which had no flags with an instruction which has flags.
Fix this by being more consistent with our flag handling by utilizing
andIRFlags.
llvm-svn: 267111
Summary: As per title. This will help work on the C API.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19173
llvm-svn: 267057
Summary:
If a PHI has an incoming undef, we can pretend that it is equal to one
non-undef, non-self incoming value.
This is particularly relevant in combination with the StructurizeCFG
pass, which introduces PHI nodes with undefs. Previously, this lead to
branch conditions that were uniform before StructurizeCFG to become
non-uniform afterwards, which confused the SIAnnotateControlFlow
pass.
This fixes a crash when Mesa radeonsi compiles a shader from
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.switch.switch_in_for_loop_dynamic_vertex
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19013
llvm-svn: 266347
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
A ``swifterror`` attribute can be applied to a function parameter or an
AllocaInst.
This commit does not include any target-specific change. The target-specific
optimization will come as a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18092
llvm-svn: 265189
Summary:
Fixed pointers to go on the right hand side following coding guidelines. NFC.
Patch by Mandeep Singh Grang.
Reviewers: majnemer, arsenm, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16866
llvm-svn: 259703
Summary:
The overloads of CallInst::Create and InvokeInst::Create that are used to
adjust operand bundles purport to create a new instruction "identical in
every way except [for] the operand bundles", so copy the DebugLoc along
with everything else.
Reviewers: sanjoy, majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16157
llvm-svn: 257745
Summary:
At least for CoreCLR, a catchpad which immediately executes an
`unreachable` instruction indicates that the exception can never have a
matching type, and so such catchpads can be removed, and so can their
catchswitches if the catchswitch becomes empty.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15846
llvm-svn: 256809
It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function. This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.
Depends on D15478.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479
llvm-svn: 255522
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
This change is discussed in D15392 and should allow us to effectively
revert:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=255261
if we canonicalize bitcasts ahead of extracts.
It should be safe to convert any pair of bitcasts into a single bitcast,
however, it was mentioned here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110829/127089.html
that we're not allowed to bitcast from an x86_mmx to some other types, but I'm
not seeing any failures from that, and we have regression tests in CodeGen/X86
that appear to cover all of those cases.
Some day we'll get to remove that MMX wart from LLVM IR completely?
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15468
llvm-svn: 255399
- This simplifies the CallSite class, arg_begin / arg_end are now
simple wrapper getters.
- In several places, we were creating CallSite instances solely to call
arg_begin and arg_end. With this change, that's no longer required.
llvm-svn: 255226
Test case attached (test case also checks that we don't drop the calling
convention, but that functionality was correct before this patch).
llvm-svn: 255088
Currently `OperandBundleUse::operandsHaveAttr` computes its result
without being given a specific operand. This is problematic because it
forces us to say that, e.g., even non-pointer operands in `"deopt"`
operand bundles are `readonly`, which doesn't make sense.
This commit changes `operandsHaveAttr` to work in the context of a
specific operand, so that we can give the operand attributes that make
sense for the operands's `llvm::Type`.
llvm-svn: 254764
Summary:
This change teaches LLVM's inliner to track and suitably adjust
deoptimization state (tracked via deoptimization operand bundles) as it
inlines through call sites. The operation is described in more detail
in the LangRef changes.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, chandlerc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14552
llvm-svn: 253438
This was an omission in the patch that landed initial support for
operand bundles. So far we haven't hit this, but we will once the
inliner is able to inline calls to functions that contain calls with
operand bundles.
llvm-svn: 252645
Reid Kleckner