Iteration over all permutations didn't really work,
due to evolution of the underlying enums.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9057
llvm-svn: 236251
Summary: This patch fixes step D4 of Knuth's division algorithm implementation. Negative sign of the step result was not always detected due to incorrect "borrow" handling.
Test Plan: Unit test that reveals the bug included.
Reviewers: chandlerc, yaron.keren
Reviewed By: yaron.keren
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9196
llvm-svn: 235699
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
llvm-svn: 234679
Summary:
When the arch is given as "arm" clang uses the default target CPU from
LLVM to determine what the real arch should be (i.e. "arm" becomes
"armv4t" because LLVM's getARMCPUForArch falls back to "arm7tdmi").
Default to "cortex-a8" so that we end up with "armv7" in clang.
the nacl-direct.c test in clang also covers this case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8589
llvm-svn: 233321
APInt uses Knuth's D algorithm for long division. In rare cases the
implementation applied a transformation that was not needed.
Added unit tests for long division. KnuthDiv() procedure is fully covered.
There is a case in APInt::divide() that I believe is never used (marked with
a comment) as all users of divide() handle trivial cases earlier.
Patch by Pawel Bylica!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8448
llvm-svn: 233312
CloudABI is a POSIX-like runtime environment built around the concept of
capability-based security. More details:
https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudlibc
CloudABI uses its own ELFOSABI number. This number has been allocated by
the maintainers of ELF a couple of days ago.
Reviewed by: echristo
llvm-svn: 231681
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
Without this, use of this copy ctor is deprecated in C++11 due to the
presence of a user-declared dtor.
Marking the class final is just a little extra security that there are
no further derived classes that may then end up using the intermediate
base class's copy assignment operator and cause slicing to occur.
I didn't bother marking the other (non-test) base class final, since it
has reference members so it won't have any implicit assignment operators
anyway. Open to ideas on that, though.
We probably want a warning about use of a slicing assignment operator,
then I wouldn't worry so much about marking the class as final.
llvm-svn: 231114
With initializer lists there is a really neat idiomatic way to write
this, 'ArrayRef.equals({1, 2, 3, 4, 5})'. Remove the equal method which
always had a hard limit on the number of arguments. I considered
rewriting it with variadic templates but that's not really a good fit
for a function with homogeneous arguments.
'ArrayRef == {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}' would've been even more awesome, but C++11
doesn't allow init lists with binary operators.
llvm-svn: 230907
I just realized that the specialized metadata node patch I'm about to
commit won't compile on old compilers. Bump `hash_combine()`'s support
for non-variadic templates to 18 (I tested this by reversing the logic
in the #ifdef).
llvm-svn: 228629
Add some API to `APSInt` to make it easier to compare with `int64_t`.
- `APSInt::compareValues(APSInt, APSInt)` returns 1, -1 or 0 for
greater, lesser, or equal, doing the right thing for mismatched
"has-sign" and bitwidths. This is just like `isSameValue()` (and is
now the implementation of it).
- `APSInt::get(int64_t)` gets a signed `APSInt`.
- `operator<(int64_t)`, etc., are implemented trivially via `get()`
and `compareValues()`.
- Also added `APSInt::getUnsigned(uint64_t)` to make it easier to test
`compareValues()`.
llvm-svn: 228239
suffix it seems:
# ./config.guess
earmv7hfeb-unknown-netbsd7.99.4
Extend the triple parsing to support this. Avoid running the ARM parser
multiple times because StringSwitch is not lazy.
Reviewers: Renato Golin, Tim Northover
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7166
llvm-svn: 227085
This patch adds a check for underflow when truncating results back to lower
precision at the end of an FMA. The additional sign handling logic in
APFloat::fusedMultiplyAdd should only be performed when the result of the
addition step of the FMA (in full precision) is exactly zero, not when the
result underflows to zero.
Unit tests for this case and related signed zero FMA results are included.
Fixes <rdar://problem/18925551>.
llvm-svn: 225123
This appears to have broken at least the windows build bots due to
compile errors in the predicate that didn't simply supress the overload.
I'm not sure what the fix is, and the bots have been broken for a long
time now so I'm just reverting until Michael can figure out a fix.
llvm-svn: 225064
If the template specialization for externally managed sets in
PostOrderIterator call too far out of sync with each other, this unit
test will fail to build. This is especially useful for developers who
may not build Clang (the only in-tree user) every time.
llvm-svn: 222447
As detailed at http://llvm.org/PR20728, due to an internal overflow in
APFloat::multiplySignificand the APFloat::fusedMultiplyAdd method can return
incorrect results for x87DoubleExtended (x86_fp80) values. This commonly
manifests as incorrect constant folding of libm fmal calls on x86. E.g.
fmal(1.0L, 1.0L, 3.0L) == 0.0L (should be 4.0L)
This patch fixes PR20728 by adding an extra bit to the significand for
intermediate results of APFloat::multiplySignificand, avoiding the overflow.
llvm-svn: 222374
Having two ways to do this doesn't seem terribly helpful and
consistently using the insert version (which we already has) seems like
it'll make the code easier to understand to anyone working with standard
data structures. (I also updated many references to the Entry's
key and value to use first() and second instead of getKey{Data,Length,}
and get/setValue - for similar consistency)
Also removes the GetOrCreateValue functions so there's less surface area
to StringMap to fix/improve/change/accommodate move semantics, etc.
llvm-svn: 222319
Ismail Donmez