Summary:
Currently the smart_ptr check (modernize-make-unique) generates the
fixes that cannot compile for cases like below -- because brace list can
not be deduced in `make_unique`.
```
struct Bar { int a, b; };
struct Foo { Foo(Bar); };
auto foo = std::unique_ptr<Foo>(new Foo({1, 2}));
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54704
llvm-svn: 347315
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
Summary:
Previously, ptr.reset(new char[5]) will be replaced with `p =
make_unique<char[]>(5)`, the fix has side effect -- doing
default initialization, it may cause performace regression (we are
bitten by this rececntly)
The check should be conservative for these cases.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53377
llvm-svn: 344733
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This improves consistency inside the check itself as well: both checks are now
disabled in macros by default.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53217
llvm-svn: 344440
Summary:
Extra parentheses around a new expression result in incorrect code
after applying fixes.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52989
llvm-svn: 344058
The std::array create multiple StringRef but did not wrap
them in braces. Some compilers warned for that. Adding the
braces is not possible and result in a compilation error.
This commit changes the array to vector which works without warning.
llvm-svn: 344046
This check warns the uses of the deprecated member types of std::ios_base
and replaces those that have a non-deprecated equivalent.
Patch by andobence!
Reviewd by: alexfh
Revision ID: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51332
llvm-svn: 343848
Summary:
Finds instances of namespaces concatenated using explicit syntax, such as `namespace a { namespace b { [...] }}` and offers fix to glue it to `namespace a::b { [...] }`.
Properly handles `inline` and unnamed namespaces. ~~Also, detects empty blocks in nested namespaces and offers to remove them.~~
Test with common use cases included.
I ran the check against entire llvm repository. Except for expected `nested namespace definitions only available with -std=c++17 or -std=gnu++17` warnings I noticed no issues when the check was performed.
Example:
```
namespace a { namespace b {
void test();
}}
```
can become
```
namespace a::b {
void test();
}
```
Patch by wgml!
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52136
llvm-svn: 343000
Summary:
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy.The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32575 where you can find more information.
For example:
```
template <typename T0>
struct S {
template <typename T>
void g() const {
int a;
(void)a;
}
};
void f() {
S<int>().g<int>();
}
```
this piece of code should not trigger any warning by the check modernize-redundant-void-arg but when we execute the following command
```
clang_tidy -checks=-*,modernize-redundant-void-arg test.cpp -- -std=c++11
```
we obtain the following warning:
/Users/eco419/Desktop/clang-tidy.project/void-redundand_2/test.cpp:6:6: warning: redundant void argument list in function declaration [modernize-redundant-void-arg]
(void)a;
^~~~
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: JonasToth, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52135
llvm-svn: 342388
Summary:
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy.
The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38039 where you can find more information.
```
struct UOB{
UOB(const UOB &Other):j{Other.j}{}
int j;
};
```
In this case the check modernize-use-equals-default does not detect copy constructors that can be defaulted; that should be:
```
struct UOB{
UOB(const UOB &Other) = default;
int j;
};
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49356
llvm-svn: 337286
This commit relands r331905.
r331904 added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 332023
[revision] added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46615
llvm-svn: 331905
It's useless and not safe to replace UTF-8 encoded with escaped ASCII to raw UTF-8 chars:
"\xE2\x98\x83" ---> <snowman>
So don't do it.
llvm-svn: 331297
The threshold option is 'MinTypeNameLength' with default value '5'.
With MinTypeNameLength == 5 'int'/'bool' and 'const int'/'const bool'
will not be converted to 'auto', while 'unsigned' will be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45405
llvm-svn: 329730
Summary:
Previously, we tried to cover all "std::initializer_list" implicit conversion
cases in the code, but there are some corner cases that not covered (see
newly-added test in the patch).
Sipping all implicit AST nodes is a better way to filter out all these cases.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44137
llvm-svn: 326799
Summary:
C++2a allows bitfields to have default member initializers.
Add support for this to clang-tidy's modernize-use-default-member-init check.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42413
llvm-svn: 323208
Summary:
A follow-up fix of rL311652.
The previous `vector` in our test is different with `std::vector`, so
The check still generates fixes for std::vector (`auto p =
std::unique_ptr<Foo>(new Foo({1,2,3}))`) in real world, the patch makes the
vector behavior in test align with std::vector (both AST nodes are the same now).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, alexfh
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41852
llvm-svn: 322822
Summary:
The current fix will break the compilation -- because braced list is not
deducible in std::make_unique (with the use of forwarding) without
specifying the type explicitly.
We could support it in the future.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36786
llvm-svn: 311078
Summary:
The crash happens when calling `reset` method without any preceding
operation like "->" or ".", this could happen in a subclass of the
"std::unique_ptr".
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36452
llvm-svn: 310496
Summary:
The check doesn't fully support smart-ptr usages inside macros, which
may cause incorrect fixes, or even crashes, ignore them for now.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36264
llvm-svn: 310050
Haojian Wu