set and eliminating the need to iterate whenever something is removed (which
can be really slow in some cases). Thx to Jim for pointing out something silly
I was getting stuck on. :)
llvm-svn: 24241
alignment information appropriately. Includes code for PowerPC to support
fixed-size allocas with alignment larger than the stack. Support for
arbitrarily aligned dynamic allocas coming soon.
llvm-svn: 24224
a special case hack for X86, make the hack more general: if an incoming argument
register is not used in any block other than the entry block, don't copy it to
a vreg. This helps us compile code like this:
%struct.foo = type { int, int, [0 x ubyte] }
int %test(%struct.foo* %X) {
%tmp1 = getelementptr %struct.foo* %X, int 0, uint 2, int 100
%tmp = load ubyte* %tmp1 ; <ubyte> [#uses=1]
%tmp2 = cast ubyte %tmp to int ; <int> [#uses=1]
ret int %tmp2
}
to:
_test:
lbz r3, 108(r3)
blr
instead of:
_test:
lbz r2, 108(r3)
or r3, r2, r2
blr
The (dead) copy emitted to copy r3 into a vreg for extra-block uses was
increasing the live range of r3 past the load, preventing the coallescing.
This implements CodeGen/PowerPC/reg-coallesce-simple.ll
llvm-svn: 24115
generating results in vregs that will need them. In the case of something
like this: CopyToReg((add X, Y), reg1024), we no longer emit code like
this:
reg1025 = add X, Y
reg1024 = reg 1025
Instead, we emit:
reg1024 = add X, Y
Whoa! :)
llvm-svn: 24111
pointer marking the end of the list, the zero *must* be cast to the pointer
type. An un-cast zero is a 32-bit int, and at least on x86_64, gcc will
not extend the zero to 64 bits, thus allowing the upper 32 bits to be
random junk.
The new END_WITH_NULL macro may be used to annotate a such a function
so that GCC (version 4 or newer) will detect the use of un-casted zero
at compile time.
llvm-svn: 23888
the input is that type, this caused a failure on gs on X86 last night.
Move the hard checks into Build[US]Div since that is where decisions like
this should be made.
llvm-svn: 23881
For example, we can now join things like [0-30:0)[31-40:1)[52-59:2)
with [40:60:0) if the 52-59 range is defined by a copy from the 40-60 range.
The resultant range ends up being [0-30:0)[31-60:1).
This fires a lot through-out the test suite (e.g. shrinking bc from
19492 -> 18509 machineinstrs) though most gains are smaller (e.g. about
50 copies eliminated from crafty).
llvm-svn: 23866
(an unused method).
Fix the merger so that it can merge ranges like this [10:12)[16:40) with
[12:38) into [10:40) instead of bogus ranges. This sort of input will be
possible for the merger coming shortly
llvm-svn: 23865
Chris Lattner