Having these not be the same makes an easy to misuse API. We should audit the
uses and probably rename to something like
foo->hasExternalLinkage():
The c++ standard one. That is UniqueExternalLinkage or ExternalLinkage.
foo->hasUniqueExternalLinkage():
Is UniqueExternalLinkage.
foo->hasCogeGenExternalLinkage():
Is ExternalLinkage.
llvm-svn: 178768
This mostly reverts 178733, but keeps the tests.
I don't claim to understand how hidden sub modules work or when we need to see
them (is that documented?), but this has the same semantics and avoids adding
hasExternalLinkageUncached which has the same foot gun potential as the old
hasExternalLinkage.
Last but not least, not computing linkage when it is not needed is more
efficient.
llvm-svn: 178739
This test was exactly the opposite of what it should be. We should check if
there old decl has linkage (where it makes sense) and if the new decl has
the extern keyword.
llvm-svn: 178735
caching the linkage for a declaration before we set up its redeclaration chain,
when determining whether a declaration could be a redeclaration of something
from an unimported submodule. We actually want to look at the declaration as if
it were not a redeclaration here, so compute the linkage but don't cache it.
llvm-svn: 178733
of a property just in case the property's getter happens to be +1.
We won't synthesize a getter for such a property, but we will allow
the user to define a +1 method for it.
rdar://13115896
llvm-svn: 178731
This is a nop right now, but committing this first avoids a temporary breakage
when the llvm files change to not default to exporting symbols.
llvm-svn: 178723
Normal name lookup ignores any hidden declarations. When name lookup
for builtin declarations fails, we just synthesize a new
declaration at the point of use. With modules, this could lead to
multiple declarations of the same builtin, if one came from a (hidden)
submodule that was later made visible. Teach name lookup to always
find builtin names, so we don't create these redundant declarations in
the first place.
llvm-svn: 178711
don't serialize a lookup map for the translation unit outside C++ mode, so we
can't tell when lookup within the TU needs to look within modules. Only apply
the fix outside C++ mode, and only to the translation unit.
llvm-svn: 178706
Improvement of r178684 and r178685.
Jordan has pointed out that I should not rely on the value of the condition to know which expression branch
has been taken. It will not work in cases the branch condition is an unknown value (ex: we do not track the constraints for floats).
The better way of doing this would be to find out if the current node is the right or left successor of the node
that has the ternary operator as a terminator (which is how this is done in other places, like ConditionBRVisitor).
llvm-svn: 178701
The lifetime of a temporary can be extended when it is immediately bound
to a local reference:
const Value &MyVal = Value("temporary");
In this case, the temporary object's lifetime is extended for the entire
scope of the reference; at the end of the scope it is destroyed.
The analyzer was modeling this improperly in two ways:
- Since we don't model temporary constructors just yet, we create a fake
temporary region when it comes time to "materialize" a temporary into
a real object (lvalue). This wasn't taking base casts into account when
the bindings being materialized was Unknown; now it always respects base
casts except when the temporary region is itself a pointer.
- When actually destroying the region, the analyzer did not actually load
from the reference variable -- it was basically destroying the reference
instead of its referent. Now it does do the load.
This will be more useful whenever we finally start modeling temporaries,
or at least those that get bound to local reference variables.
<rdar://problem/13552274>
llvm-svn: 178697
1) Look for the node where the condition expression is live when checking if
it is constrained to true or false.
2) Fix a bug in ProgramState::isNull, which was masking the problem. When
the expression is not a symbol (,which is the case when it is Unknown) return
unconstrained value, instead of value constrained to “false”!
(Thankfully other callers of isNull have not been effected by the bug.)
llvm-svn: 178684
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
Syntactically means the function macro parameter names do not need to use the same
identifiers in order for the definitions to be considered identical.
Syntactic equivalence is a microsoft extension for macro redefinitions and we'll also
use this kind of comparison to check for ambiguous macros coming from modules.
rdar://13562254
llvm-svn: 178671
smarts so that it doesn't approve of keywords and/or type names when it
knows (based on its flags) that those kinds of corrections are not
wanted.
llvm-svn: 178668
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
This combines several related changes:
a) Don't break before after the variable types in for loops with a
single variable.
b) Better indent DeclStmts defining multiple variables.
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
llvm-svn: 178641
Summary:
It turns out that we don't need to store CommentsBeforeNextToken in the
line state, but rather flush them before we start parsing preprocessor
directives. This fixes wrong comment indentation in code blocks in macro calls
(the test is included).
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D617
llvm-svn: 178638
expressions are integer. It can also be ValueDecl expressions
Use the type information from the TemplateParameterList instead
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178611
When support was added for declaration arguments, the case of variadic
declaration arguments was not supported. This patch fixes that problem by
not crashing when certain ValueDecl's are null.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178610
Value depenedent expressions for default arguments cannot be evaluated.
Instead, use the desugared template type to get an argument expression that
can be used. This is needed for both integer and declaration arguements.
Also, move this common code into a separate function.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 178609
Fariborz Jahanian