Summary:
These directives are used to toggle whether the assembler accepts MSA-specific instructions or not.
Patch by Matheus Almeida and Toma Tabacu.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4783
llvm-svn: 215099
Changes to the original patch:
- model the CFG for temporary destructors in conditional operators so that
the destructors of the true and false branch are always exclusive. This
is necessary because we must not have impossible paths for the path
based analysis to work.
- add multiple regression tests with ternary operators
Original description:
Fix modelling of non-lifetime-extended temporary destructors in the
analyzer.
Changes to the CFG:
When creating the CFG for temporary destructors, we create a structure
that mirrors the branch structure of the conditionally executed
temporary constructors in a full expression.
The branches we create use a CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator which
corresponds to the temporary constructor which must have been executed
to enter the destruction branch.
2. Changes to the Analyzer:
When we visit a CXXBindTemporaryExpr we mark the CXXBindTemporaryExpr as
executed in the state; when we reach a branch that contains the
corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator, we branch out
depending on whether the corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr was marked
as executed.
llvm-svn: 215096
shuffle lowering.
This is closely related to the previous one. Here we failed to use the
source offset when swapping in the other case -- where we end up
swapping the *final* shuffle. The cause of this bug is a bit different:
I simply wasn't thinking about the fact that this mask is actually
a slice of a wide mask and thus has numbers that need SourceOffset
applied. Simple fix. Would be even more simple with an algorithm-y thing
to use here, but correctness first. =]
llvm-svn: 215095
via the fuzz tester.
Here I missed an offset when round-tripping a value through a shuffle
mask. I got it right 2 lines below. See a problem? I do. ;] I'll
probably be adding a little "swap" algorithm which accepts a range and
two values and swaps those values where they occur in the range. Don't
really have a name for it, let me know if you do.
llvm-svn: 215094
through the new fuzzer.
This one is great: bad operator precedence led the modulus to happen at
the wrong point. All the asserts didn't fire because there were usually
the right values past the end of the 4 element region we were looking
at. Probably could have gotten a crash here with ASan + fuzzing, but the
correctness tests pinpointed this really nicely.
llvm-svn: 215092
Summary:
Since pointers are 32-bit on x32 we can use ebp and esp as frame and stack
pointer. Some operations like PUSH/POP and CFI_INSTRUCTION still
require 64-bit register, so using 64-bit MachineFramePtr where required.
X86_64 NaCl uses 64-bit frame/stack pointers, however it's been found that
both isTarget64BitLP64 and isTarget64BitILP32 are true for NaCl. Addressing
this issue here as well by making isTarget64BitLP64 false.
Also mark hasReservedSpillSlot unreachable on X86. See inlined comments.
Test Plan: Add one new simple test and upgrade 2 existing with x32 target case.
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4617
llvm-svn: 215091
fuzz testing.
The function which tested for adjacency did what it said on the tin, but
when I called it, I wanted it to do something more thorough: I wanted to
know if the *pairs* of shuffle elements were adjacent and started at
0 mod 2. In one place I had the decency to try to test for this, but in
the other it was completely skipped, miscompiling this test case. Fix
this by making the helper actually do what I wanted it to do everywhere
I called it (and removing the now redundant code in one place).
I *really* dislike the name "canWidenShuffleElements" for this
predicate. If anyone can come up with a better name, please let me know.
The other name I thought about was "canWidenShuffleMask" but is it
really widening the mask to reduce the number of lanes shuffled? I don't
know. Naming things is hard.
llvm-svn: 215089
It also allows nested { } expressions, as now that they are sized, we can merge pull bits from the nested value.
In the current behaviour, everything in { } must have been convertible to a single bit.
However, now that binary literals are sized, its useful to be able to initialize a range of bits.
So, for example, its now possible to do
bits<8> x = { 0, 1, { 0b1001 }, 0, 0b0 }
llvm-svn: 215086
Instead of these becoming an integer literal internally, they now become bits<n> values.
Prior to this change, 0b001 was 1 bit long. This is confusing as clearly the user gave 3 bits.
This new type holds both the literal value and the size, and so can ensure sizes match on initializers.
For example, this used to be legal
bits<1> x = 0b00;
but now it must be written as
bits<2> x = 0b00;
llvm-svn: 215084
Prior to this change, it was legal to do something like
bits<2> opc = { 0, 1 };
bits<2> opc2 = { 1, 0 };
bits<2> a = { opc, opc2 };
This involved silently dropping bits from opc and opc2 which is very hard to debug.
Now the above test would be an error. Having tested with an assert, none of LLVM/clang was relying on this behaviour.
Thanks to Adam Nemet for the above test.
llvm-svn: 215083
The commit after this changes { } and 0bxx literals to be of type bits<n> and not int. This means we need to write exactly the right number of bits, and not rely on the values being silently zero extended for us.
llvm-svn: 215082
within a single bit-width of vectors. This is particularly useful for
when you know you have bugs in a certain area and want to find simpler
test cases than those produced by an open-ended fuzzing that ends up
legalizing the vector in addition to shuffling it.
llvm-svn: 215056
This is a python script which for a given seed generates a random
sequence of random shuffles of a random vector width. It embeds this
into a function and emits a main function which calls the test routine
and checks that the results (where defined) match the obvious results.
I'll be using this to drive out miscompiles from the new vector shuffle
logic now that it is clean of any crashes I can find with llvm-stress.
Note, my python skills are very poor. Sorry if this is terrible code,
and feel free to tell me how I should write this or just patch it as
necessary.
The tests generated try to be very portable and use boring C routines.
It technically will mis-declare the C routines and pass 32-bit integers
to parametrs that expect 64-bit integers. If someone wants to fix this
and has less terrible ideas of how to do it, I'm all ears. Fortunately,
this "just works" for x86. =]
llvm-svn: 215054
mach-o doesn't like sections without segments, and elf is perfectly
happy with commas in section names, so use a Darwin-like section name.
Suggestion by Eric Christopher.
llvm-svn: 215052
This changes Win64EHEmitter into a utility WinEH UnwindEmitter that can be
shared across multiple architectures and a target specific bit which is
overridden (Win64::UnwindEmitter). This enables sharing the section selection
code across X86 and the intended use in ARM for emitting unwind information for
Windows on ARM.
llvm-svn: 215050
question mark instead of the context of the conditional operator. The
condition does not need the context of the conditional operator at all.
llvm-svn: 215048
intent when we added remark support, but was never implemented in the general
case, because the first -R flags didn't need it. (-Rpass= had special handling
to accomodate its argument.)
-Rno-foo, -Reverything, and -Rno-everything can be used to turn off a remark,
or to turn on or off all remarks. Per discussion on cfe-commits, -Weverything
does not affect remarks, and -Reverything does not affect warnings or errors.
The only "real" -R flag we have right now is -Rmodule-build; that flag is
effectively renamed from -Wmodule-build to -Rmodule-build by this change.
-Wpass and -Wno-pass (and their friends) are also renamed to -Rpass and
-Rno-pass by this change; it's not completely clear whether we intended to have
a -Rpass (with no =pattern), but that is unchanged by this commit, other than
the flag name. The default pattern is effectively one which matches no passes.
In future, we may want to make the default pattern be .*, so that -Reverything
works for -Rpass properly.
llvm-svn: 215046
Also make the disassembler created with the Mach-O parser (the -m option)
pick up the Target specific attributes specified with -mattr option.
llvm-svn: 215032
Fixes PR18916. I don't think we need to implement support for either
hybrid syntax. Nobody should write Intel assembly with '%' prefixes on
their registers or AT&T assembly without them.
llvm-svn: 215031
This reverts commit r214962 because after the change the
following code doesn't compile with -Wreturn-type -Werror.
#include <cstdlib>
class NoReturn {
public:
~NoReturn() __attribute__((noreturn)) { exit(1); }
};
int check() {
true ? NoReturn() : NoReturn();
}
llvm-svn: 214998
The tests assume the path separator is '/', but if you run
them on Windows it is '\'. As a result the tests are failing
on Windows. This should be the minimal change to make these
tests to pass on Windows platform.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4710
llvm-svn: 214990
to get the subtarget and that's accessible from the MachineFunction
now. This helps clear the way for smaller changes where we getting
a subtarget will require passing in a MachineFunction/Function as
well.
llvm-svn: 214988
In r210492 the logic of calculateDbgValueHistory was changed to end
register variable live ranges at the end of MBB conditionally on
the fact that the register was or not clobbered by the function body.
This requires an initial scan of all the operands of the function
to collect all clobbered registers. In a second pass over all
instructions, we compare this set with the set of clobbered
registers for the current MachineInstruction. This modification
incurred a compilation time regression on some benchmarks: the
debug info emission phase takes ~10% more time.
While a small performance hit is unavoidable due to the initial
scan requirement, we can improve the situation by avoiding to
create too many temporary sets and just use lambdas to work directly
on the result of the initial scan.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17884104>
Patch by Frederic Riss!
llvm-svn: 214987
Joerg Sonnenberger