into the enclosing scope; this is a more accurate model but is
(I believe) unnecessary in my test case due to other flaws.
However, one of those flaws is now intentional: blocks which
appear in return statements can be trivially observed to not
extend in lifetime past the return, and so we can allow a jump
past them. Do the necessary magic in IR-generation to make
this work.
llvm-svn: 164589
semantics of a ctor/dtor function-try-block catch handler
by pushing a normal cleanup is not just overkill but actually
actively wrong when the handler contains an explicit return
(which is only legal in a dtor). Just emit the rethrow as
ordinary code at the fallthrough point. Fixes PR13102.
llvm-svn: 158488
need to provide a 'dominating IP' which is guaranteed to
dominate the (de)activation point but which cannot be avoided
along any execution path from the (de)activation point to
the push-point of the cleanup. Using the entry block is
bad mojo.
llvm-svn: 144276
hierarchy of delegation, and that EH selector values are meaningful
function-wide (good thing, too, or inlining wouldn't work).
2,3d
1a
hierarchy of delegation and that EH selector values have the same
meaning everywhere in the function instead of being meaningful only
in the context of a specific selector.
This removes the need for routing edges through EH cleanups,
since a cleanup simply always branches to its enclosing scope.
llvm-svn: 137293
allocation and therefore requires a null-check. We were doing that, but
we weren't treating the new-initializer as being conditionally executed,
which means it was possible to get ill-formed IR as in PR9298.
llvm-svn: 127147
necessarily enclose the innermost normal cleanup depth, because
the top of the jump scope stack might be an EH cleanup or EH scope.
Fixes PR9303.
llvm-svn: 126472
the cleanup might not be dominated by the allocation code.
In this case, we have to store aside all the delete arguments
in case we need them later. There's room for optimization here
in cases where we end up not actually needing the cleanup in
different branches (or being able to pop it after the
initialization code).
Also make sure we only call this operator delete along the path
where we actually allocated something.
Fixes rdar://problem/8439196.
llvm-svn: 114145
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Bill Wendling