We need to address cases (breaking libc++) such as
template <class _Up> static int __test(...);
template<typename _Tp>
auto v = __test<_Tp>(0);
llvm-svn: 299956
At present, clang-format mangles Java containing logical right shift operators
('>>>=' or '>>>'), splitting them in two, resulting in invalid code:
public class Minimal {
public void func(String args) {
int i = 42;
- i >>>= 1;
+ i >> >= 1;
return i;
}
}
This adds both forms of logical right shift to the FormatTokenLexer, so
clang-format won't attempt to split them and insert bogus whitespace.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31652
Patch from Richard Bradfield <bradfier@fstab.me>!
llvm-svn: 299952
as identifiers in Objective-C++
This commit improves the 'expected identifier' errors that are presented when a
C++ keyword is used as an identifier in Objective-C++ by mentioning that this is
a C++ keyword in the diagnostic message. It also improves the error recovery:
the parser will now treat the C++ keywords as identifiers to prevent unrelated
parsing errors.
rdar://20626062
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26503
llvm-svn: 299950
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments.
The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070
llvm-svn: 299949
Summary:
In rL299692 I improved strip-dead-debug-info's ability to drop CUs that are not
referenced from the current module. However, in doing so I neglected to realize
that some SPs could be referenced entirely from inlined functions. It appears
I was not the only one to make this mistake, because DebugInfoFinder, doesn't
find those SPs either. Fix this in DebugInfoFinder and then use that to make
sure not to drop those CUs in strip-dead-debug-info.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31904
llvm-svn: 299936
Summary:
The files there can always be referred to using their full path, which
is what most of the code has been doing already, so this makes the
situation more consistent. Also fix the the code in the FreeBSD plugin
to use the new paths.
Reviewers: eugene, emaste
Subscribers: lldb-commits, kettenis, mgorny, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31877
llvm-svn: 299933
Use the same handling in the generic legalizer code as for the other
libcalls (G_FREM, G_FPOW).
Enable it on ARM for float and double so we can test it.
llvm-svn: 299931
Summary: Legalize only if the type is marked as Legal or Custom. If not, return Unsupported as LegalizerHelper is not able to handle non-power-of-2 types right now.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, ab
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls, ab
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31711
llvm-svn: 299929
A fix for the bug reported in PR30911.
The issue arises when multiple CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes are unscheduled as
the last node to be unscheduled will gain access to the CallResource
register. But when a node is being picked, only CALLSEQ_END nodes are
checked against the CallResource and have their chains evaluated.
This then means that other CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes can be scheduled
before the existing call sequence has been finalised. This patch adds
a check against the FrameSetup nodes in DelayForLiveRegs to prevent
this from happening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31536
llvm-svn: 299926
Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.
llvm-svn: 299925
Previously in r297800, a work-around was created to use TSC emulation on x86_64 when RDTSCP was not available on the host. A similar change was needed in the file xray_fdr_logging.cc which this patch ports over to that file.
Eventually the code should be refactored as there will be 3 locations with the same code, but that can be done as a separate step. This patch is just to keep the test from failing on my machine due to an illegal instruction since RDTSCP is not available on my x86_64 linux VM.
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31909
llvm-svn: 299922
Summary:
We can move this functionality into LLVM's tools instead, as it no
longer is strictly required for the compiler-rt testing infrastructure.
It also is blocking the successful bootstrapping of the clang compiler
due to a missing virtual destructor in one of the flag parsing library.
Since this binary isn't critical for the XRay runtime testing effort
anymore (yet), we remove it in the meantime with the hope of moving the
functionality in LLVM proper instead.
Reviewers: kpw, pelikan, rnk, seurer, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31926
llvm-svn: 299916
(h/t to Chandler for pointing this out)
The test in question was not at all testing what it was supposed to
test. We do not //care// about placing `!make.implicit` in inner
constant branch (since it will be folded away anyway). We care about
placing `!make.implicit` in the outer branch that switches between
either version of the loop.
Having said that, it is _correct_ to leave behind the `!make.implicit`
in the inner branch, but there is no need to do so.
llvm-svn: 299912
When allowed, we can hoist a division out of a loop in favor of a
multiplication by the reciprocal. Fixes PR32157.
Patch by vit9696!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30819
llvm-svn: 299911
Check the legality of ISD::[US]MULO to see whether
Intrinsic::[us]mul_with_overflow will legalize into a function call (and, thus,
will use the CTR register). Fixes PR32485.
Patch by Tim Neumann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31790
llvm-svn: 299910
We were removing comdats from externalized functions (function declarations
can't be comdat), but were not doing the same for variable. Failure to do this
would cause bugpoint to fail ("Declaration may not be in a Comdat!").
llvm-svn: 299908
Maxim Ostapenko