This actually looks through several kinds of expression, such as
OpaqueValueExpr and ExprWithCleanups. The idea is that binding and lookup
should be consistent, and so if the environment needs to be modified later,
the code doing the modification will not have to manually look through these
"transparent" expressions to find the real binding to change.
This is necessary for proper updating of struct rvalues as described in
the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 166121
In C++, rvalues that need to have their address taken (for example, to be
passed to a function by const reference) will be wrapped in a
MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which lets CodeGen know to create a temporary
region to store this value. However, MaterializeTemporaryExprs are /not/
created when a method is called on an rvalue struct, even though the 'this'
pointer needs a valid value. CodeGen works around this by creating a
temporary region anyway; now, so does the analyzer.
The analyzer also does this when accessing a field of a struct rvalue.
This is a little unfortunate, since the rest of the struct will soon be
thrown away, but it does make things consistent with the rest of the
analyzer.
This allows us to bring back the assumption that all known 'this' values
are Locs. This is a revised version of r164828-9, reverted in r164876-7.
<rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 166120
This was only used by OSAtomicChecker and makes it more
difficult to update values for expressions that the environment
may look through instead (it's not the same as IgnoreParens).
With this gone, we can have bindExpr bind to the inner
expression that getSVal will find.
Groundwork for <rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 165866
I believe the removed assert in CheckerManager says it best:
InlineCall is a special hacky callback to allow intrusive
evaluation of the call (which simulates inlining). It is
currently only used by OSAtomicChecker and should go away
at some point.
OSAtomicChecker has gone away; inlineCall can now go away as well!
llvm-svn: 165865
This time, actually uncomment the code that's supposed to fix the problem.
This reverts r165671 / 8ceb837585ed973dc36fba8dfc57ef60fc8f2735.
llvm-svn: 165676
Author: Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>
Date: Wed Oct 10 21:31:21 2012 +0000
[analyzer] Treat fields of unions as having symbolic offsets.
This allows only one field to be active at a time in RegionStore.
This isn't quite the correct behavior for unions, but it at least
would handle the case of "value goes in, value comes out" from the
same field.
RegionStore currently has a number of places where any access to a union
results in UnknownVal being returned. However, it is clearly missing
some cases, or the original issue wouldn't have occurred. It is probably
now safe to remove those changes, but that's a potentially destabilizing
change that should wait for more thorough testing.
Fixes PR14054.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@165660 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit cf9030e480f77ab349672f00ad302e216c26c92c.
llvm-svn: 165671
This allows only one field to be active at a time in RegionStore.
This isn't quite the correct behavior for unions, but it at least
would handle the case of "value goes in, value comes out" from the
same field.
RegionStore currently has a number of places where any access to a union
results in UnknownVal being returned. However, it is clearly missing
some cases, or the original issue wouldn't have occurred. It is probably
now safe to remove those changes, but that's a potentially destabilizing
change that should wait for more thorough testing.
Fixes PR14054.
llvm-svn: 165660
...but do run them on user headers.
Previously, we were inconsistent here: non-path-sensitive checks on code
/bodies/ were only run in the main source file, but checks on
/declarations/ were run in /all/ headers. Neither of those is the
behavior we want.
Thanks to Sujit for pointing this out!
<rdar://problem/12454226>
llvm-svn: 165635
Some implicit statements, such as the implicit 'self' inserted for "free"
Objective-C ivar access, have invalid source locations. If one of these
statements is the location where an issue is reported, we'll now look at
the enclosing statements for a valid source location.
<rdar://problem/12446776>
llvm-svn: 165354
In C++, overriding virtual methods are allowed to specify a covariant
return type -- that is, if the return type of the base method is an
object pointer type (or reference type), the overriding method's return
type can be a pointer to a subclass of the original type. The analyzer
was failing to take this into account when devirtualizing a method call,
and anything that relied on the return value having the proper type later
would crash.
In Objective-C, overriding methods are allowed to specify ANY return type,
meaning we can NEVER be sure that devirtualizing will give us a "safe"
return value. Of course, a program that does this will most likely crash
at runtime, but the analyzer at least shouldn't crash.
The solution is to check and see if the function/method being inlined is
the function that static binding would have picked. If not, check that
the return value has the same type. If the types don't match, see if we
can fix it with a derived-to-base cast (the C++ case). If we can't,
return UnknownVal to avoid crashing later.
<rdar://problem/12409977>
llvm-svn: 165079
These functions are store-agnostic, and would benefit from information in
DynamicTypeInfo but gain nothing from the store type.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 165078
table, making it printable with the ConfigDump checker. Along the
way, fix a really serious bug where the value was getting parsed
from the string in code that was in an assert() call. This means
in a Release-Asserts build this code wouldn't work as expected.
llvm-svn: 165041
By analogy with C structs, this seems to be legal, if probably discouraged.
It's only if the ivar is read from or written to that there's a problem.
Running a program that gets the "address" of an instance variable does in
fact return the offset when the base "object" is nil.
This isn't a full revert because r164442 includes some diagnostic tweaks
as well; those have been kept.
This partially reverts r164442 / 08965091770c9b276c238bac2f716eaa4da2dca4.
llvm-svn: 164960
The original intent of this commit was to catch potential null dereferences
early, but it breaks the common "home-grown offsetof" idiom (PR13927):
(((struct Foo *)0)->member - ((struct foo *)0))
As it turns out, this appears to be legal in C, per a footnote in
C11 6.5.3.2: "Thus, &*E is equivalent to E (even if E is a null pointer)".
In C++ this issue is still open:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#232
We'll just have to make sure we have good path notes in the future.
This reverts r164441 / 9be016dcd1ca3986873a7b66bd4bc027309ceb59.
llvm-svn: 164958
string in the config table so that it can be dumped as part of the
config dumper. Add a test to show that these options are sticking
and can be cross-checked using FileCheck.
llvm-svn: 164954
This is related to but not blocked by <rdar://problem/12137950>
("Return-by-value structs do not have associated regions")
This reverts r164875 / 3278d41e17749dbedb204a81ef373499f10251d7.
llvm-svn: 164952
It is possible and valid to have a state manager and associated objects
without having a SubEngine or checkers.
Patch by Olaf Krzikalla!
llvm-svn: 164947
the validation occurred.
The original implementation was pessimistic - we assumed that ivars
which escape are invalidated. This version is optimistic, it assumes
that the ivars will always be explicitly invalidated: either set to nil
or sent an invalidation message.
llvm-svn: 164868
Previously the analyzer treated all inlined constructors like lvalues,
setting the value of the CXXConstructExpr to the newly-constructed
region. However, some CXXConstructExprs behave like rvalues -- in
particular, the implicit copy constructor into a pass-by-value argument.
In this case, we want only the /contents/ of a temporary object to be
passed, so that we can use the same "copy each argument into the
parameter region" algorithm that we use for scalar arguments.
This may change when we start modeling destructors of temporaries,
but for now this is the last part of <rdar://problem/12137950>.
llvm-svn: 164830
An rvalue has no address, but calling a C++ member function requires a
'this' pointer. This commit makes the analyzer create a temporary region
in which to store the struct rvalue and use as a 'this' pointer whenever
a member function is called on an rvalue, which is essentially what
CodeGen does.
More of <rdar://problem/12137950>. The last part is tracking down the
C++ FIXME in array-struct-region.cpp.
llvm-svn: 164829
Struct rvalues are represented in the analyzer by CompoundVals,
LazyCompoundVals, or plain ConjuredSymbols -- none of which have associated
regions. If the entire structure is going to persist, this is not a
problem -- either the rvalue will be assigned to an existing region, or
a MaterializeTemporaryExpr will be present to create a temporary region.
However, if we just need a field from the struct, we need to create the
temporary region ourselves.
This is inspired by the way CodeGen handles calls to temporaries;
support for that in the analyzer is coming next.
Part of <rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 164828
This checker is annotation driven. It checks that the annotated
invalidation method accesses all ivars of the enclosing objects that are
objects of type, which in turn contains an invalidation method.
This is driven by
__attribute((annotation("objc_instance_variable_invalidator")).
llvm-svn: 164716
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
This depends on the previous commit to be correct. Originally applied in
r163444, reverted in r164275, now being re-applied.
llvm-svn: 164622
No tests, but this allows the optimization of removing dead constraints.
We can then add tests that we don't do this prematurely.
<rdar://problem/12333297>
Note: the added FIXME to investigate SymbolRegionValue liveness is
tracked by <rdar://problem/12368183>. This patch does not change the
existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 164621
This is a heuristic intended to greatly reduce the number of false
positives resulting from inlining, particularly inlining of generic,
defensive C++ methods that live in header files. The suppression is
triggered in the cases where we ask to track where a null pointer came
from, and it turns out that the source of the null pointer was an inlined
function call.
This change brings the number of bug reports in LLVM from ~1500 down to
around ~300, a much more manageable number. Yes, some true positives may
be hidden as well, but from what I looked at the vast majority of silenced
reports are false positives, and many of the true issues found by the
analyzer are still reported.
I'm hoping to improve this heuristic further by adding some exceptions
next week (cases in which a bug should still be reported).
llvm-svn: 164449
Before, PathDiagnosticConsumers that did not support actual path output
would (sensibly) cause the generation of the full path to be skipped.
However, BugReporterVisitors may want to see the path in order to mark a
BugReport as invalid.
Now, even for a path generation scheme of 'None' we will still create a
trimmed graph and walk backwards through the bug path, doing no work other
than passing the nodes to the BugReporterVisitors. This isn't cheap, but
it's necessary to properly do suppression when the first path consumer does
not support path notes.
In the future, we should try only generating the path and visitor-provided
path notes once, or at least only creating the trimmed graph once.
llvm-svn: 164447
This is intended to allow visitors to make decisions about whether a
BugReport is likely a false positive. Currently there are no visitors
making use of this feature, so there are no tests.
When a BugReport is marked invalid, the invalidator must provide a key
that identifies the invaliation (intended to be the visitor type and a
context pointer of some kind). This allows us to reverse the decision
later on. Being able to reverse a decision about invalidation gives us more
flexibility, and allows us to formulate conditions like "this report is
invalid UNLESS the original argument is 'foo'". We can use this to
fine-tune our false-positive suppression (coming soon).
llvm-svn: 164446
Rather than saying "Null pointer value stored to 'foo'", we now say
"Passing null pointer value via Nth parameter 'foo'", which is much better.
The note is also now on the argument expression as well, rather than the
entire call.
This paves the way for continuing to track arguments back to their sources.
<rdar://problem/12211490>
llvm-svn: 164444
Like with struct fields, we want to catch cases like this early,
so that we can produce better diagnostics and path notes:
PointObj *p = nil;
int *px = &p->_x; // should warn here
*px = 1;
llvm-svn: 164442
We want to catch cases like this early, so that we can produce better
diagnostics and path notes:
Point *p = 0;
int *px = &p->x; // should warn here
*px = 1;
llvm-svn: 164441
their implementations are unavailable. Start by simulating dispatch_sync().
This change is largely a bunch of plumbing around something very simple. We
use AnalysisDeclContext to conjure up a fake function body (using the
current ASTContext) when one does not exist. This is controlled
under the analyzer-config option "faux-bodies", which is off by default.
The plumbing in this patch is largely to pass the necessary machinery
around. CallEvent needs the AnalysisDeclContextManager to get
the function definition, as one may get conjured up lazily.
BugReporter and PathDiagnosticLocation needed to be relaxed to handle
invalid locations, as the conjured body has no real source locations.
We do some primitive recovery in diagnostic generation to generate
some reasonable locations (for arrows and events), but it can be
improved.
llvm-svn: 164339
If someone provides their own function called 'strdup', or 'reallocf', or
even 'malloc', and we inlined it, the inlining should have given us all the
malloc-related information we need. If we then try to attach new information
to the return value, we could end up with spurious warnings.
<rdar://problem/12317671>
llvm-svn: 164276
While we definitely want this optimization in the future, we're not
currently handling constraints on symbolic /expressions/ correctly.
These should stay live even if the SymExpr itself is no longer referenced
because could recreate an identical SymExpr later. Only once the SymExpr
can no longer be recreated -- i.e. a component symbol is dead -- can we
safely remove the constraints on it.
This liveness issue is tracked by <rdar://problem/12333297>.
This reverts r163444 / 24c7f98828e039005cff3bd847e7ab404a6a09f8.
llvm-svn: 164275
in ObjCMethods.
Extend FunctionTextRegion to represent ObjC methods as well as
functions. Note, it is not clear what type ObjCMethod region should
return. Since the type of the FunctionText region is not currently used,
defer solving this issue.
llvm-svn: 164046
crazy case where dispatch_once gets redefined as a macro that calls
_dispatch_once (which calls the real dispatch_once). Users want to
see the warning in their own code.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11617767>
llvm-svn: 163816
in NSException to a helper object in libAnalysis that can also
be used by Sema. Not sure if the predicate name 'isImplicitNoReturn'
is the best one, but we can massage that later.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 163759
Again, GCC is more aggressive about reusing temporary space than we are,
leading to Release build crashes for this undefined behavior.
PR13710 (though it may not be the only problem there)
llvm-svn: 163747
Currently we don't update the dynamic type of a C++ object when it is
cast. This can cause the situation above, where the static type of the
region is now known to be a subclass of the dynamic type.
Once we start updating DynamicTypeInfo in response to the various kinds
of casts in C++, we can re-add this assert to make sure we don't miss
any cases. This work is tracked by <rdar://problem/12287087>.
In -Asserts builds, we will simply not return any runtime definition
when our DynamicTypeInfo is known to be incorrect like this.
llvm-svn: 163745
Using the static type may be inconsistent with later calls. We should just
report that there is no inlining definition available if the static type is
better than the dynamic type. See next commit.
This reverts r163644 / 19d5886d1704e24282c86217b09d5c6d35ba604d.
llvm-svn: 163744
While PR13724 is still an issue, it's not actually an issue in the STL.
We can keep this option around in case there turn out to be widespread
false positives due to poor modeling of the C++ standard library functions,
but for now we'd like to get more data.
This reverts r163633 / c6baadceec1d5148c20ee6c902a102233c547f62.
llvm-svn: 163647
reinterpret_cast does not provide any of the usual type information that
static_cast or dynamic_cast provide -- only the new type. This can get us
in a situation where the dynamic type info for an object is actually a
superclass of the static type, which does not match what CodeGen does at all.
In these cases, just fall back to the static type as the best possible type
for devirtualization.
Should fix the crashes on our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 163644
C++11 [expr.call]p1: ...If the selected function is non-virtual, or if the
id-expression in the class member access expression is a qualified-id,
that function is called. Otherwise, its final overrider in the dynamic type
of the object expression is called.
<rdar://problem/12255556>
llvm-svn: 163577
The option allows to always inline very small functions, whose size (in
number of basic blocks) is set using -analyzer-config
ipa-always-inline-size option.
llvm-svn: 163558
This is a (heavy-handed) solution to PR13724 -- until we know we can do
a good job inlining the STL, it's best to be consistent and not generate
more false positives than we did before. We can selectively whitelist
certain parts of the 'std' namespace that are known to be safe.
This is controlled by analyzer config option 'c++-stdlib-inlining', which
can be set to "true" or "false".
This commit also adds control for whether or not to inline any templated
functions (member or non-member), under the config option
'c++-template-inlining'. This option is currently on by default.
llvm-svn: 163548
I need to see how this breaks on other platforms when I fix the issue
that Benjamin Kramer pointed out.
This includes r163489 and r163490, plus a two line change.
llvm-svn: 163512
r163489, "Take another crack at stabilizing the emission order of analyzer"
r163490, "Use isBeforeInTranslationUnitThan() instead of operator<."
llvm-svn: 163497
diagnostics without using FoldingSetNodeIDs. This is done
by doing a complete recursive comparison of the PathDiagnostics.
Note that the previous method of comparing FoldingSetNodeIDs did
not end up relying on unstable things such as pointer addresses, so
I suspect this may still have some issues on various buildbots because
I'm not sure if the true source of non-determinism has been eliminated.
The tests pass for me, so the only way to know is to commit this change
and see what happens.
llvm-svn: 163489
ObjCSelfInitChecker stashes information in the GDM to persist it across
function calls; it is stored in pre-call checks and retrieved post-call.
The post-call check is supposed to clear out the stored state, but was
failing to do so in cases where the call did not have a symbolic return
value.
This was actually causing the inappropriate cache-out from r163361.
Per discussion with Anna, we should never actually cache out when
assuming the receiver of an Objective-C message is non-nil, because
we guarded that node generation by checking that the state has changed.
Therefore, the only states that could reach this exact ExplodedNode are
ones that should have merged /before/ making this assumption.
r163361 has been reverted and the test case removed, since it won't
actually test anything interesting now.
llvm-svn: 163449
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
llvm-svn: 163444
RegionStoreManager was only treating a SymbolicRegion's symbel as live
if there was a binding referring to the region itself.
No test case because constraints are currently not being cleaned out
of the constraint manager at all (even if the symbol is legitimately dead).
llvm-svn: 163443
This is necessary because further analysis will assume that the SVal's
type matches the AST type. This caused a crash when trying to perform
a derived-to-base cast on a C++ object that had been new'd to be another
object type.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163442
with at least one subtle bug in MacOSXKeyChainAPIChecker where the
calling the method was a substitute for assuming a symbolic value
was null (which is not the case).
We still keep ConstraintManager::getSymVal(), but we use that as
an optimization in SValBuilder and ProgramState::getSVal() to
constant-fold SVals. This is only if the ConstraintManager can
provide us with that information, which is no longer a requirement.
As part of this, introduce a default implementation of
ConstraintManager::getSymVal() which returns null.
For Checkers, introduce ConstraintManager::isNull(), which queries
the state to see if the symbolic value is constrained to be a null
value. It does this without assuming it has been implicitly constant
folded.
llvm-svn: 163428
When adding the next statement to the CoreEngine's work list, we take care
of all the special cases first. We certainly shouldn't be building
PostStmts with null statements (the diagnostics machinery assumes such
StmtPoints do not exist), and we should find out sooner if we're missing
a special case.
A refinement of r163402 that should help prevent further issues like PR13760.
llvm-svn: 163409
GCC destroys temporary objects more aggressively than clang, so this
results in incorrect behavior when compiling GCC Release builds.
We could avoid this issue under C++11 by preventing getAs from being
called when 'this' is an rvalue:
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const & { ... }
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const && = delete;
Unfortunately, we do not have compatibility macros for this behavior yet.
This will hopefully fix PR13760 and PR13762.
llvm-svn: 163402
While the check itself should count 0-based for the parameter index,
the diagnostic should be 1-based (first, second, third, not start at 0).
Fixes <rdar://problem/12249569>.
llvm-svn: 163375
(as this previously was the case before this was refactored). We also shouldn't
need to specially handle BinaryOperators since the eagerly-assume heuristic tags
such nodes.
llvm-svn: 163374
implicit pointer-to-boolean conversions in condition expressions. This would
result in inconsistent diagnostic emission between C and C++.
A consequence of this is now ConditionBRVisitor and TrackConstraintBRVisitor may
emit redundant diagnostics, for example:
"Assuming pointer value is null" (TrackConstraintBRVisitor)
"Assuming 'p' is null" (ConditionBRVisitor)
We need to reconcile the two, and perhaps prefer one over the other in some
cases.
llvm-svn: 163372
With some particularly evil casts, we can get an object whose dynamic type
is not actually a subclass of its static type. In this case, we won't even
find the statically-resolved method as a devirtualization candidate.
Rather than assert that this situation cannot occur, we now simply check
that the dynamic type is not an ancestor or descendent of the static type,
and leave it at that.
This error actually occurred analyzing LLVM: CallEventManager uses a
BumpPtrAllocator to allocate a concrete subclass of CallEvent
(FunctionCall), but then casts it to the actual subclass requested
(such as ObjCMethodCall) to perform the constructor.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163367
A bizarre series of coincidences led us to generate a previously-seen
node in the middle of processing an Objective-C message, where we assume
the receiver is non-nil. We were assuming that such an assumption would
never "cache out" like this, and blithely went on using a null ExplodedNode
as the predecessor for the next step in evaluation.
Although the test case committed here is complicated, this could in theory
happen in other ways as well, so the correct fix is just to test if the
non-nil assumption results in an ExplodedNode we've seen before.
<rdar://problem/12243648>
llvm-svn: 163361
are used in EH code. Right now the CFG doesn't support exceptions well,
so we need this hack to avoid bogus dead store warnings.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12147586>
llvm-svn: 163353
CXXDestructorCall now has a flag for when it is a base destructor call.
Other kinds of destructor calls (locals, fields, temporaries, and 'delete')
all behave as "whole-object" destructors and do not behave differently
from one another (specifically, in these cases we /should/ try to
devirtualize a call to a virtual destructor).
This was causing crashes in both our internal buildbot, the crash still
being tracked in PR13765, and some of the crashes being tracked in PR13763,
due to a assertion failure. (The behavior under -Asserts happened to be
correct anyway.)
Adding this knowledge also allows our DynamicTypePropagation checker to do
a bit less work; the special rules about virtual method calls during a
destructor only require extra handling during base destructors.
llvm-svn: 163348
While destructors will continue to not be inlined (unless the analyzer
config option 'c++-inlining' is set to 'destructors'), leaving them out
of the CFG is an incomplete model of the behavior of an object, and
can cause false positive warnings (like PR13751, now working).
Destructors for temporaries are still not on by default, since
(a) we haven't actually checked this code to be sure it's fully correct
(in particular, we probably need to be very careful with regard to
lifetime-extension when a temporary is bound to a reference,
C++11 [class.temporary]p5), and
(b) ExprEngine doesn't actually do anything when it sees a temporary
destructor in the CFG -- not even invalidate the object region.
To enable temporary destructors, set the 'cfg-temporary-dtors' analyzer
config option to '1'. The old -cfg-add-implicit-dtors cc1 option, which
controlled all implicit destructors, has been removed.
llvm-svn: 163264
If a region is binded to a symbolic value, we should track the symbol.
(The code I changed was not previously exercised by the regression
tests.)
llvm-svn: 163261
The problem is that the value of 'this' in a C++ member function call
should always be a region (or NULL). However, if the object is an rvalue,
it has no associated region (only a conjured symbol or LazyCompoundVal).
For now, we handle this in two ways:
1) Actually respect MaterializeTemporaryExpr. Before, it was relying on
CXXConstructExpr to create temporary regions for all struct values.
Now it just does the right thing: if the value is not in a temporary
region, create one.
2) Have CallEvent recognize the case where its 'this' pointer is a
non-region, and just return UnknownVal to keep from confusing clients.
The long-term problem is being tracked internally in <rdar://problem/12137950>,
but this makes many test cases pass.
llvm-svn: 163220
This turned out to have many implications, but what eventually seemed to
make it unworkable was the fact that we can get struct values (as
LazyCompoundVals) from other places besides return-by-value function calls;
that is, we weren't actually able to "treat all struct values as regions"
consistently across the entire analyzer core.
Hopefully we'll be able to come up with an alternate solution soon.
This reverts r163066 / 02df4f0aef142f00d4637cd851e54da2a123ca8e.
llvm-svn: 163218
SimpleSValBuilder processes a couple trivial identities, including 'x - x'
and 'x ^ x' (both 0). However, the former could appear with arguments of
floating-point type, and we weren't checking for that. This started
triggering an assert with r163069, which checks that a constant value is
actually going to be used as an integer or pointer.
llvm-svn: 163159
All clients of BasicValueFactory should be using QualTypes instead, and
indeed it seems they are. This caught the (fortunately harmless) bug
fixed in the previous commit.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 163069
The current logic would actually create a float- or double-sized signed
integer value of 1, which is not at all the same.
No test because the value would be swallowed by an Unknown as soon as it
gets added or subtracted to the original value, but it enables the cleanup
in the next patch.
llvm-svn: 163068
Any future exceptions need to go INSIDE the test that checks if the
IdentifierInfo is non-null!
No functionality change. Thanks for the review, Ted.
llvm-svn: 163067
This allows us to correctly symbolicate the fields of structs returned by
value, as well as get the proper 'this' value for when methods are called
on structs returned by value.
This does require a moderately ugly hack in the StoreManager: if we assign
a "struct value" to a struct region, that now appears as a Loc value being
bound to a region of struct type. We handle this by simply "dereferencing"
the struct value region, which should create a LazyCompoundVal.
This should fix recent crashes analyzing LLVM and on our internal buildbot.
<rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 163066
Previously, we preferred to get a result type by looking at the callee's
declared result type. This allowed us to handlereferences, which are
represented in the AST as lvalues of their pointee type. (That is, a call
to a function returning 'int &' has type 'int' and value kind 'lvalue'.)
However, this results in us preferring the original type of a function
over a casted type. This is a problem when a function pointer is casted
to another type, because the conjured result value will have the wrong
type. AdjustedReturnValueChecker is supposed to handle this, but still
doesn't handle the case where there is no "original function" at all,
i.e. where the callee is unknown.
Now, we instead look at the call expression's value kind (lvalue, xvalue,
or prvalue), and adjust the expr's type accordingly. This will have no
effect when the function is inlined, and will conjure the value that will
actually be used when it is not.
This makes AdjustedReturnValueChecker /nearly/ unnecessary; unfortunately,
the cases where it would still be useful are where we need to cast the
result of an inlined function or a checker-evaluated function, and in these
cases we don't know what we're casting /from/ by the time we can do post-
call checks. In light of that, remove AdjustedReturnValueChecker, which
was already not checking quite a few calls.
llvm-svn: 163065
This is similar to how we divide up the StaticAnalyzer libraries to separate
core functionality to what is clearly associated with Frontend actions.
llvm-svn: 163050
Fixes a hard-to-reach crash when calling a non-member overloaded operator
with arguments that may be callbacks.
Future-proofing: don't make the same assumption in MallocSizeofChecker.
Aside from possibly respecting attributes in the future, it might be
possible to call 'malloc' through a function pointer.
I audited all other uses of FunctionDecl::getIdentifier() in the analyzer;
they all now correctly test to see if the identifier is present before
using it.
llvm-svn: 163012
More generally, this adds a new configuration option 'c++-inlining', which
controls which C++ member functions can be considered for inlining. This
uses the new -analyzer-config table, so the cc1 arguments will look like this:
... -analyzer-config c++-inlining=[none|methods|constructors|destructors]
Note that each mode implies that all the previous member function kinds
will be inlined as well; it doesn't make sense to inline destructors
without inlining constructors, for example.
The default mode is 'methods'.
llvm-svn: 163004
PathDiagnostics are actually profiled and uniqued independently of the
path on which the bug occurred. This is used to merge diagnostics that
refer to the same issue along different paths, as well as by the plist
diagnostics to reference files created by the HTML diagnostics.
However, there are two problems with the current implementation:
1) The bug description is included in the profile, but some
PathDiagnosticConsumers prefer abbreviated descriptions and some
prefer verbose descriptions. Fixed by including both descriptions in
the PathDiagnostic objects and always using the verbose one in the profile.
2) The "minimal" path generation scheme provides extra information about
which events came from macros that the "extensive" scheme does not.
This resulted not only in different locations for the plist and HTML
diagnostics, but also in diagnostics being uniqued in the plist output
but not in the HTML output. Fixed by storing the "end path" location
explicitly in the PathDiagnostic object, rather than trying to find the
last piece of the path when the diagnostic is requested.
This should hopefully finish unsticking our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 162965
Basically, do the correct thing to fix the XML generation error, rather
than making it even worse by unilaterally dereferencing a null pointer.
llvm-svn: 162964
(__builtin_* etc.) so that it isn't possible to take their address.
Specifically, introduce a new type to represent a reference to a builtin
function, and a new cast kind to convert it to a function pointer in the
operand of a call. Fixes PR13195.
llvm-svn: 162962
reanalyzed.
The policy on what to reanalyze should be in AnalysisConsumer with the
rest of visitation order logic.
There is no reason why ExprEngine needs to pass the Visited set to
CoreEngine, it can populate it itself.
llvm-svn: 162957
If the current path diagnostic does /not/ have files associated with it, we
were simply skipping on to the next diagnostic with 'continue'. But that
also skipped the close tag for the diagnostic's <dict> node.
Part of fixing our internal analyzer buildbot.
llvm-svn: 162939
inlined function.
This resolves retain count checker false positives that are caused by
inlining ObjC and other methods. Essentially, if we are passing an
object to a method with "delegate" in the selector or a function pointer
as another argument, we should stop tracking the other parameters/return
value as far as the retain count checker is concerned.
llvm-svn: 162876
This heuristic addresses the case when a pointer (or ref) is passed
to a function, which initializes the variable (or sets it to something
other than '0'). On the branch where the inlined function does not
set the value, we report use of undefined value (or NULL pointer
dereference). The access happens in the caller and the path
through the callee would get pruned away with regular path pruning. To
solve this issue, we previously disabled diagnostic pruning completely
on undefined and null pointer dereference checks, which entailed very
verbose diagnostics in most cases. Furthermore, not all of the
undef value checks had the diagnostic pruning disabled.
This patch implements the following heuristic: if we pass a pointer (or
ref) to the region (on which the error is reported) into a function and
it's value is either undef or 'NULL' (and is a pointer), do not prune
the function.
llvm-svn: 162863
a comma separated collection of key:value pairs (which are strings). This
allows a general way to provide analyzer configuration data from the command line.
No clients yet.
llvm-svn: 162827
In C++, objects being returned on the stack are actually copy-constructed into
the return value. That means that when a temporary is returned, it still has
to be destroyed, i.e. the returned expression will be wrapped in an
ExprWithCleanups node. Our "returning stack memory" checker needs to look
through this node to see if we really are returning an object by value.
PR13722
llvm-svn: 162817
Specifically, CallEventManager::getCaller was looking at the call site for
an inlined call and trying to see what kind of call it was, but it only
checked for CXXConstructExprClass. (It's not using an isa<> here to avoid
doing three more checks on the the statement class.)
This caused an unreachable when we actually did inline the constructor of a
temporary object.
PR13717
llvm-svn: 162792
When exiting a function, the analyzer looks for the last statement in the
function to see if it's a return statement (and thus bind the return value).
However, the search for "the last statement" was accepting statements that
were in implicitly-generated inlined functions (i.e. destructors). So we'd
go and get the statement from the destructor, and then say "oh look, this
function had no explicit return...guess there's no return value". And /that/
led to the value being returned being declared dead, and all our leak
checkers complaining.
llvm-svn: 162791
No test case since this is a debug option that we will never turn on by
default since it makes the leak checkers much less useful. (We'll only report
leaks at the end of analysis if -analyzer-purge=none.)
llvm-svn: 162772
This helper function (in the clang::ento::bugreporter namespace) may add more
than one visitor, but conceptually it's tracking a single use of a null or
undefined value and should do so as best it can.
Also, the BugReport parameter has been made a reference to underscore that
it is non-optional.
llvm-svn: 162720
As Anna pointed out to me offline, it's a little silly to walk backwards through
the graph to find the store site when BugReporter will do the exact same walk
as part of path diagnostic generation.
llvm-svn: 162719
Previously, if we were tracking stores to a variable 'x', and came across this:
x = foo();
...we would simply emit a note here and stop. Now, we'll step into 'foo' and
continue tracking the returned value from there.
<rdar://problem/12114689>
llvm-svn: 162718
The two callers are using this in order to be conservative, so let's just
clarify the information that's actually being provided here. This is not
related to inlining decisions in any way.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162717
Because the CXXNewExpr appears after the CXXConstructExpr in the CFG, we don't
actually have the correct region to construct into at the time we decide
whether or not to inline. The long-term fix (discussed in PR12014) might be to
introduce a new CFG node (CFGAllocator) that appears before the constructor.
Tracking the short-term fix in <rdar://problem/12180598>.
llvm-svn: 162689
This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.
We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.
<rdar://problem/11986434>
llvm-svn: 162681
This allows checkers (like the MallocChecker) to process the effects of the
bind. Previously, using a memory-allocating function (like strdup()) in an
initializer would result in a leak warning.
This does bend the expectations of checkBind a bit; since there is no
assignment expression, the statement being used is the initializer value.
In most cases this shouldn't matter because we'll use a PostInitializer
program point (rather than PostStmt) for any checker-generated nodes, though
we /will/ generate a PostStore node referencing the internal statement.
(In theory this could have funny effects if someone actually does an
assignment within an initializer; in practice, that seems like it would be
very rare.)
<rdar://problem/12171711>
llvm-svn: 162637
generated for a given diagnostic to another. Because PathDiagnostics
are specific to a give PathDiagnosticConsumer, store in
a FoldingSet a unique hash for a PathDiagnostic (that will be the same
for the same bug for different PathDiagnosticConsumers) that
stores a list of files generated. This can then be read by the
other PathDiagnosticConsumers.
This fixes breakage in the PLIST-HTML output.
llvm-svn: 162580
More generally, any time we try to track where a null value came from, we
should show if it came from a function. This usually isn't necessary if
the value is symbolic, but if the value is just a constant we previously
just ignored its origin entirely. Now, we'll step into the function and
recursively add a visitor to the returned expression.
<rdar://problem/12114609>
llvm-svn: 162563
This code has been added a while ago and removing it does not trigger
any test failures. The false positives it was trying to suppress are
probably handled by other logic (ex: special handling of delegates).
llvm-svn: 162529
With inlining, retain count checker starts tracking 'self' through the
init methods. The analyser results were too noisy if the developer
did not follow 'self = [super init]' pattern (which is common
especially in older code bases) - we reported self init anti-pattern AND
possible use-after-free. This patch teaches the retain count
checker to assume that [super init] does not fail when it's not consumed
by another expression. This silences the retain count warning that warns
about possibility of use-after-free when init fails, while preserving
all the other checking on 'self'.
llvm-svn: 162508
Until we have full support for pointers-to-members, we can at least
approximate some of their use by tracking null and non-null values.
We thus treat &A::m_ptr as a non-null void * symbol, and MemberPointer(0)
as a pointer-sized null constant.
This enables support for what is sometimes called the "safe bool" idiom,
demonstrated in the test case.
llvm-svn: 162495
This is trivial; the UserDefinedConversion always wraps a CXXMemberCallExpr
for the appropriate conversion function, so it's just a matter of
propagating that value to the CastExpr itself.
llvm-svn: 162494
A CXXDefaultArgExpr wraps an Expr owned by a ParmVarDecl belonging to the
called function. In general, ExprEngine and Environment ought to treat this
like a ParenExpr or other transparent wrapper expression, with the inside
expression evaluated first.
However, if we call the same function twice, we'd produce a CFG that contains
the same wrapped expression twice, and we're not set up to handle that. I've
added a FIXME to the CFG builder to come back to that, but meanwhile we can
at least handle expressions that don't need to be explicitly evaluated:
literals. This probably handles many common uses of default parameters:
true/false, null, etc.
Part of PR13385 / <rdar://problem/12156507>
llvm-svn: 162453
The checker adds assumptions that the return values from the known APIs
are non-nil. Teach the checker about NSArray/NSMutableArray/NSOrderedSet
objectAtIndex, objectAtIndexedSubscript.
llvm-svn: 162398
As part of this change, I discovered that a few of our tests were not testing
the RangeConstraintManager. Luckily all of those passed when I moved them
over to use that constraint manager.
llvm-svn: 162384
Also rename 'getCurrentBlockCounter()' to 'blockCount()'.
This ripples a bunch of code simplifications; mostly aesthetic,
but makes the code a bit tighter.
llvm-svn: 162349
No need to have the "get", the word "conjure" is a verb too!
Getting a conjured symbol is the same as conjuring one up.
This shortening is largely cosmetic, but just this simple changed
cleaned up a handful of lines, making them less verbose.
llvm-svn: 162348
Under -analyzer-ipa=basic-inlining, only C functions, blocks, and C++ static
member functions are inlined -- essentially, the calls that behave like simple
C function calls. This is essentially the behavior in Xcode 4.4.
C++ support still has some rough edges, and we don't want users to be worried
about them if they download and run their own checker. (In particular, the
massive number of false positives for analyzing LLVM comes from inlining
defensively-written code in contexts where more aggressive assumptions are
implicitly made. This problem is not unique to C++, but it is exacerbated by
the higher proportion of code that lives in header files in C++.)
The eventual goal is to be comfortable enough with C++ support (and simple
Objective-C support) to advance to -analyzer-ipa=inlining as the default
behavior. See the IPA design notes for more details.
llvm-svn: 162318
This reduces duplication across the Basic and Range constraint managers, and
keeps their internals free of dealing with the semantics of C++. It's still
a little unfortunate that the constraint manager is dealing with this at all,
but this is pretty much the only place to put it so that it will apply to all
symbolic values, even when embedded in larger expressions.
llvm-svn: 162313
By doing this in the constraint managers, we can ensure that ANY reference
whose value we don't know gets the effect, even if it's not a top-level
parameter.
llvm-svn: 162246
Generating a sink is significantly different behavior from generating a
normal node, and a simple boolean parameter can be rather opaque. Per
offline discussion with Anna, adding new generation methods is the
clearest way to communicate intent.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162215
Forgetting to at least cast the result was giving us Loc/NonLoc problems
in SValBuilder (hitting an assertion). But the standard (both C and C++)
does actually guarantee that && and || will result in the actual values
1 and 0, typed as 'int' in C and 'bool' in C++, and we can easily model that.
PR13461
llvm-svn: 162209
Our current handling of 'throw' is all CFG-based: it jumps to a 'catch' block
if there is one and the function exit block if not. But this doesn't really
get the right behavior when a function is inlined: execution will continue on
the caller's side, which is always the wrong thing to do.
Even within a single function, 'throw' completely skips any destructors that
are to be run. This is essentially the same problem as @finally -- a CFGBlock
that can have multiple entry points, whose exit points depend on whether it
was entered normally or exceptionally.
Representing 'throw' as a sink matches our current (non-)handling of @throw.
It's not a perfect solution, but it's better than continuing analysis in an
inconsistent or even impossible state.
<rdar://problem/12113713>
llvm-svn: 162157
The CFG approximates @throw as a return statement, but that's not good
enough in inlined functions. Moreover, since Objective-C exceptions are
usually considered fatal, we should be suppressing leak warnings like we
do for calls to noreturn functions (like abort()).
The comments indicate that we were probably intending to do this all along;
it may have been inadvertantly changed during a refactor at one point.
llvm-svn: 162156
This was once an adapter class between callbacks that had CheckerContexts
and those that don't, but for a while now it's essentially just been a
wrapper around a ProgramPointTag. We can just pass the tag around instead.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162155
This fixes several issues:
- removes egregious hack where PlistDiagnosticConsumer would forward to HTMLDiagnosticConsumer,
but diagnostics wouldn't be generated consistently in the same way if PlistDiagnosticConsumer
was used by itself.
- emitting diagnostics to the terminal (using clang's diagnostic machinery) is no longer a special
case, just another PathDiagnosticConsumer. This also magically resolved some duplicate warnings,
as we now use PathDiagnosticConsumer's diagnostic pruning, which has scope for the entire translation
unit, not just the scope of a BugReporter (which is limited to a particular ExprEngine).
As an interesting side-effect, diagnostics emitted to the terminal also have their trailing "." stripped,
just like with diagnostics emitted to plists and HTML. This required some tests to be updated, but now
the tests have higher fidelity with what users will see.
There are some inefficiencies in this patch. We currently generate the report graph (from the ExplodedGraph)
once per PathDiagnosticConsumer, which is a bit wasteful, but that could be pulled up higher in the
logic stack. There is some intended duplication, however, as we now generate different PathDiagnostics (for the same issue)
for different PathDiagnosticConsumers. This is necessary to produce the diagnostics that a particular
consumer expects.
llvm-svn: 162028
and remove ASTContext reference (which was frequently bound to a dereferenced
null pointer) from the recursive lump of printPretty functions. In so doing,
fix (at least) one case where we intended to use the 'dump' mode, but that
failed because a null ASTContext reference had been passed in.
llvm-svn: 162011
This is analogous to our handling of pointer dereferences: if we
dereference a pointer that may or may not be null, we assume it's non-null
from then on.
While some implementations of C++ (including ours) allow you to call a
non-virtual method through a null pointer of object type, it is technically
disallowed by the C++ standard, and should not prune out any real paths in
practice.
[class.mfct.non-static]p1: A non-static member function may be called
for an object of its class type, or for an object of a class derived
from its class type...
(a null pointer value does not refer to an object)
We can also make the same assumption about function pointers.
llvm-svn: 161992
This is the other half of C++11 [class.cdtor]p4 (the destructor side
was added in r161915). This also fixes an issue with post-call checks
where the 'this' value was already being cleaned out of the state, thus
being omitted from a reconstructed CXXConstructorCall.
llvm-svn: 161981
With reinterpret_cast, we can get completely unrelated types in a region
hierarchy together; this was resulting in CXXBaseObjectRegions being layered
directly on an (untyped) SymbolicRegion, whose symbol was from a completely
different type hierarchy. This was what was causing the internal buildbot to
fail.
Reverts r161911, which merely masked the problem.
llvm-svn: 161960
Previously we were checking -analyzer-ipa=dynamic-bifurcate only, and
unconditionally inlining everything else that had an available definition,
even under -analyzer-ipa=inlining (but not under -analyzer-ipa=none).
llvm-svn: 161916
C++11 [class.cdtor]p4: When a virtual function is called directly or
indirectly from a constructor or from a destructor, including during
the construction or destruction of the class’s non-static data members,
and the object to which the call applies is the object under
construction or destruction, the function called is the final overrider
in the constructor's or destructor's class and not one overriding it in
a more-derived class.
llvm-svn: 161915
The autorelease pool has not been implemented completely: we were adding
the autoreleased symbols to the state, but never looking at them. Until
we have a complete implementation, remove the overhead and comment out
the unused code.
llvm-svn: 161821
to set/get/remove the RefBinding.
No functional change here. Having these setter and getter methods will
make it much easier when replacing the underlining representation of
RefBindings (I just went through the exercise). It makes the code more
readable as well.
llvm-svn: 161820
While there is now some duplication between SimpleCall and the CXXInstanceCall
sub-hierarchy, this is much better than copy-and-pasting the devirtualization
logic shared by both instance methods and destructors.
An unfortunate side effect is that there is no longer a single CallEvent type
that corresponds to "calls written as CallExprs". For the most part this is a
good thing, but the checker callback eval::Call still takes a CallExpr rather
than a CallEvent (since we're not sure if we want to allow checkers to
evaluate other kinds of calls). A mistake here will be caught by a cast<> in
CheckerManager::runCheckersForEvalCall.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 161809
Anna Zaks