I think the intrinsics named 'avx512.mask.' should refer to the previous behavior of taking a mask argument in the intrinsic instead of using a 'select' or 'and' instruction in IR to accomplish the masking. This is more consistent with the goal that eventually we will have no intrinsics that have masking builtin. When we reach that goal, we should have no intrinsics named "avx512.mask".
llvm-svn: 335744
This recommits r335562 and 335563 as a single commit.
The frontend will surround the intrinsic with the appropriate marshalling to/from a scalar type to match the sigature of the builtin that software expects.
By exposing the vXi1 type directly in the llvm intrinsic we make it available to optimizers much earlier. This can enable the scalar marshalling code to be optimized away.
llvm-svn: 335568
The frontend will surround the intrinsic with the appropriate marshalling to/from a scalar type to match the sigature of the builtin that software expects.
By exposing the vXi1 type directly in the llvm intrinsic we make it available to optimizers much earlier. This can enable the scalar marshalling code to be optimized away.
llvm-svn: 335563
Ensure we test on 32-bit and 64-bit targets, and strip -mcpu usage.
Part of ongoing work to ensure we test all intrinsic style tests on 32 and 64 bit targets where possible.
llvm-svn: 333843
Craig Topper