Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Petar Jovanovic e2bfcd6394 Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
  instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
  at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.

Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848

llvm-svn: 330706
2018-04-24 10:32:08 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 7adb2fdbba Revert "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This reverts r317579, originally committed as r317100.

There is a design issue with marking CFI instructions duplicatable. Not
all targets support the CFIInstrInserter pass, and targets like Darwin
can't cope with duplicated prologue setup CFI instructions. The compact
unwind info emission fails.

When the following code is compiled for arm64 on Mac at -O3, the CFI
instructions end up getting tail duplicated, which causes compact unwind
info emission to fail:
  int a, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m;
  void n(int o, int *b) {
    if (g)
      f = 0;
    for (; f < o; f++) {
      m = a;
      if (l > j * k > i)
        j = i = k = d;
      h = b[c] - e;
    }
  }

We get assembly that looks like this:
; BB#1:                                 ; %if.then
Lloh3:
	adrp	x9, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh4:
	ldr	x9, [x9, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
	mov	 w8, wzr
Lloh5:
	str		wzr, [x9]
	stp	x20, x19, [sp, #-16]!   ; 8-byte Folded Spill
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	.cfi_offset w19, -8
	.cfi_offset w20, -16
	cmp		w8, w0
	b.lt	LBB0_3
	b	LBB0_7
LBB0_2:                                 ; %entry.if.end_crit_edge
Lloh6:
	adrp	x8, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh7:
	ldr	x8, [x8, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
Lloh8:
	ldr		w8, [x8]
	stp	x20, x19, [sp, #-16]!   ; 8-byte Folded Spill
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	.cfi_offset w19, -8
	.cfi_offset w20, -16
	cmp		w8, w0
	b.ge	LBB0_7
LBB0_3:                                 ; %for.body.lr.ph

Note the multiple .cfi_def* directives. Compact unwind info emission
can't handle that.

llvm-svn: 317726
2017-11-08 21:31:14 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic e2a585dddc Reland "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
Reland r317100 with minor fix regarding ComputeCommonTailLength function in
BranchFolding.cpp. Skipping top CFI instructions block needs to executed on
several more return points in ComputeCommonTailLength().

Original r317100 message:

"Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"

This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.

It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Changed CFI instructions so that they:

- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
  its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.

CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.

Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

llvm-svn: 317579
2017-11-07 14:40:27 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic bb5c84fb57 Revert "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This reverts r317100 as it introduced sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf
buildbot failure (build #15606).

llvm-svn: 317136
2017-11-01 23:05:52 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic f2faee92aa Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.

It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Changed CFI instructions so that they:

- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
  its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.

CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.


Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844

llvm-svn: 317100
2017-11-01 16:04:11 +00:00
Reid Kleckner ab23dace56 [MC] Suppress .Lcfi labels when emitting textual assembly
Summary:
This suppresses the generation of .Lcfi labels in our textual assembler.
It was annoying that this generated cascading .Lcfi labels:
  llc foo.ll -o - | llvm-mc | llvm-mc

After three trips through MCAsmStreamer, we'd have three labels in the
output when none are necessary. We should only bother creating the
labels and frame data when making a real object file.

This supercedes D38605, which moved the entire .seh_ implementation into
MCObjectStreamer.

This has the advantage that we do more checking when emitting textual
assembly, as a minor efficiency cost. Outputting textual assembly is not
performance critical, so this shouldn't matter.

Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB

Subscribers: qcolombet, nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38638

llvm-svn: 315259
2017-10-10 00:57:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 39cdb84560 [X86] Make sure we still emit zext for GR32 to GR64 when the source of the zext is AssertZext
The AssertZext we might see in this case is only giving information about the lower 32 bits. It isn't providing information about the upper 32 bits. So we should emit a zext.

This fixes PR28540.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37729

llvm-svn: 313563
2017-09-18 20:49:13 +00:00
Craig Topper 66e4ace1c8 [X86] Rename TruncAssertZext.ll test to TruncAssertSext.ll. Since its testing AssertSext.
llvm-svn: 312991
2017-09-12 01:30:10 +00:00
Matthias Braun 6b898beb8e X86: Do not use llc -march in tests.
`llc -march` is problematic because it only switches the target
architecture, but leaves the operating system unchanged. This
occasionally leads to indeterministic tests because the OS from
LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE is used.

However we can simply always use `llc -mtriple` instead. This changes
all the tests to do this to avoid people using -march when they copy and
paste parts of tests.

See also the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D35287

llvm-svn: 309774
2017-08-02 00:28:10 +00:00
Bob Wilson a61a19037a Fix CR/LF line endings in test case.
llvm-svn: 222120
2014-11-17 08:00:45 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 3fe15e498f [X86] Fix pattern match for 32-to-64-bit zext in the presence of AssertSext
This fixes an issue with matching trunc -> assertsext -> zext on x86-64, which would not zero the high 32-bits. See PR20494 for details.
Recommitting - This time, with a hopefully working test.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6128

llvm-svn: 221672
2014-11-11 07:07:40 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 217e1eec0d Reverting r221626 due to a too-strict test.
llvm-svn: 221629
2014-11-10 21:07:41 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 3218b942f4 [X86] Fix pattern match for 32-to-64-bit zext in the presence of AssertSext
This fixes an issue with matching trunc -> assertsext -> zext on x86-64, which would not zero the high 32-bits.
See PR20494 for details.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6128

llvm-svn: 221626
2014-11-10 20:40:21 +00:00