subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
Some clients may add block live ins and may track liveness over a
large scope. This guarantees an efficient implementation in all cases
with no memory allocation/deallocation, independent of the number of
target registers. It could be slightly less convenient but is fine in
the expected case.
llvm-svn: 192622
When if converting something like:
true:
... = R0<kill>
false:
... = R0<kill>
then the instructions of the true block must not have a <kill> flag
anymore, as the instruction of the false block follow and do still read
the R0 value.
Specifically this patch determines the set of register live-in in the
false block (possibly after simulating the liveness changes of the
duplicated instructions). Each of these live-in registers mustn't be
killed.
llvm-svn: 192482
For targets that have instruction itineraries this means no change. Targets
that move over to the new schedule model will use be able the new schedule
module for instruction latencies in the if-converter (the logic is such that if
there is no itineary we will use the new sched model for the latencies).
Before, we queried "TTI->getInstructionLatency()" for the instruction latency
and the extra prediction cost. Now, we query the TargetSchedule abstraction for
the instruction latency and TargetInstrInfo for the extra predictation cost. The
TargetSchedule abstraction will internally call "TTI->getInstructionLatency" if
an itinerary exists, otherwise it will use the new schedule model.
ATTENTION: Out of tree targets!
(I will also send out an email later to LLVMDev)
This means, if your target implements
unsigned getInstrLatency(const InstrItineraryData *ItinData,
const MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned *PredCost);
and returns a value for "PredCost", you now also need to implement
unsigned getPredictationCost(const MachineInstr *MI);
(if your target uses the IfConversion.cpp pass)
radar://15077010
llvm-svn: 191671
Prior to this patch, IfConverter may widen the cases where a sequence of
instructions were executed because of the way it uses nested predicates. This
result in incorrect execution.
For instance, Let A be a basic block that flows conditionally into B and B be a
predicated block.
B can be predicated with A.BrToBPredicate into A iff B.Predicate is less
"permissive" than A.BrToBPredicate, i.e., iff A.BrToBPredicate subsumes
B.Predicate.
The IfConverter was checking the opposite: B.Predicate subsumes
A.BrToBPredicate.
<rdar://problem/14379453>
llvm-svn: 187071
In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.
These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.
llvm-svn: 179227
This fixes some of the cycles between libCodeGen and libSelectionDAG. It's still
a complete mess but as long as the edges consist of virtual call it doesn't
cause breakage. BasicTTI did static calls and thus broke some build
configurations.
llvm-svn: 172246
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
No functional change intended.
Sorry for the churn. The iterator classes are supposed to help avoid
giant commits like this one in the future. The TableGen-produced
register lists are getting quite large, and it may be necessary to
change the table representation.
This makes it possible to do so without changing all clients (again).
llvm-svn: 157854
Moving toward a uniform style of pass definition to allow easier target configuration.
Globally declare Pass ID.
Globally declare pass initializer.
Use INITIALIZE_PASS consistently.
Add a call to the initializer from CodeGen.cpp.
Remove redundant "createPass" functions and "getPassName" methods.
While cleaning up declarations, cleaned up comments (sorry for large diff).
llvm-svn: 150100
unpredicated. That is, turn
subeq r0, r1, #1
addne r0, r1, #1
into
sub r0, r1, #1
addne r0, r1, #1
For targets where conditional instructions are always executed, this may be
beneficial. It may remove pseudo anti-dependency in out-of-order execution
CPUs. e.g.
op r1, ...
str r1, [r10] ; end-of-life of r1 as div result
cmp r0, #65
movne r1, #44 ; raw dependency on previous r1
moveq r1, #12
If movne is unpredicated, then
op r1, ...
str r1, [r10]
cmp r0, #65
mov r1, #44 ; r1 written unconditionally
moveq r1, #12
Both mov and moveq are no longer depdendent on the first instruction. This gives
the out-of-order execution engine more freedom to reorder them.
This has passed entire LLVM test suite. But it has not been enabled for any ARM
variant pending more performance evaluation.
rdar://8951196
llvm-svn: 146914
generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same
as the MC layer API.
For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the
bundled instructions has the property it would return true.
For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled
instructions have the property.
For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for
bundles.
llvm-svn: 146026
sink them into MC layer.
- Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang
TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo.
llvm-svn: 134021
at the start of basic blocks to their common predecessor. It's actually quite
common (e.g. about 50 times in JM/lencod) and has shown to be a nice code size
benefit. e.g.
pushq %rax
testl %edi, %edi
jne LBB0_2
## BB#1:
xorb %al, %al
popq %rdx
ret
LBB0_2:
xorb %al, %al
callq _foo
popq %rdx
ret
=>
pushq %rax
xorb %al, %al
testl %edi, %edi
je LBB0_2
## BB#1:
callq _foo
LBB0_2:
popq %rdx
ret
rdar://9145558
llvm-svn: 131172
successors) and use inverse depth first search to traverse the BBs. However
that doesn't work when the CFG has infinite loops. Simply do a linear
traversal of all BBs work just fine.
rdar://9344645
llvm-svn: 130324
1. Fix pre-ra scheduler so it doesn't try to push instructions above calls to
"optimize for latency". Call instructions don't have the right latency and
this is more likely to use introduce spills.
2. Fix if-converter cost function. For ARM, it should use instruction latencies,
not # of micro-ops since multi-latency instructions is completely executed
even when the predicate is false. Also, some instruction will be "slower"
when they are predicated due to the register def becoming implicit input.
rdar://8598427
llvm-svn: 118135
do not double-count the duplicate instructions by counting once from the
beginning and again from the end. Keep track of where the duplicates from
the beginning ended and don't go past that point when counting duplicates
at the end. Radar 8589805.
This change causes one of the MC/ARM/simple-fp-encoding tests to produce
different (better!) code without the vmovne instruction being tested.
I changed the test to produce vmovne and vmoveq instructions but moving
between register files in the opposite direction. That's not quite the same
but predicated versions of those instructions weren't being tested before,
so at least the test coverage is not any worse, just different.
llvm-svn: 117333
instructions separately from the count of non-predicated instructions. The
instruction count is used in places to determine how many instructions to
copy, predicate, etc. and things get confused if that count includes the
extra cost for microcoded ops.
llvm-svn: 117332
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
llvm-svn: 116334
Chandler Carruth