This commit makes changes to IfConverter::AnalyzeBlock to use iteration instead
of recursion. Previously, this function would get called recursively a large
number of times and eventually segfault when a function with the following CFG
was compiled:
BB0:
if (condition0)
goto BB1
goto BB2
BB1:
goto BB2
BB2:
if (condition1)
goto BB3
goto BB4
BB3:
...
(repeat until BB7488)
rdar://problem/21386145
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10587
llvm-svn: 240589
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
on a per-function basis.
Previously some of the passes were conditionally added to ARM's pass pipeline
based on the target machine's subtarget. This patch makes changes to add those
passes unconditionally and execute them conditonally based on the predicate
functor passed to the pass constructors. This enables running different sets of
passes for different functions in the module.
rdar://problem/20542263
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8717
llvm-svn: 239325
We had code such as this:
r2 = ...
t2Bcc
label1:
ldr ... r2
label2;
return r2<dead, def>
The if converter was transforming this to
r2<def> = ...
return [pred] r2<dead,def>
ldr <r2, kill>
return
which fails the machine verifier because the ldr now reads from a dead def.
The fix here detects dead defs in stepForward and passes them back to the caller in the clobbers list. The caller then clears the dead flag from the def is the value is live.
llvm-svn: 236660
Note, this is a recommit of r236515 after fixing an error in r236514. The buildbot ran fast enough that it picked up r236514 prior to r236515 and threw an error. r236515 itself ran 'make check' without errors.
Original commit message follows:
A regmask (typically seen on a call) clobbers the set of registers it lists. The IfConverter, in UpdatePredRedefs, was handling register defs, but not regmasks.
These are slightly different to a def in that we need to add both an implicit use and def to appease the machine verifier. Otherwise, uses after the if converted call could think they are reading an undefined register.
Reviewed by Matthias Braun and Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 236550
Note, this is a reapplication of r236515 with a fix to not assert on non-register operands, but instead only handle them until the subsequent commit. Original commit message follows.
The code was basically the same here already. Just added an out parameter for a vector of seen defs so that UpdatePredRedefs can call StepForward first, then do its own post processing on the seen defs.
Will be used in the next commit to also handle regmasks.
llvm-svn: 236538
This reverts commit b27413cbfd78d959c18e713bfa271fb69e6b3303 (ie r236515).
This is to get the bots green while i investigate the failures.
llvm-svn: 236517
A regmask (typically seen on a call) clobbers the set of registers it lists. The IfConverter, in UpdatePredRedefs, was handling register defs, but not regmasks.
These are slightly different to a def in that we need to add both an implicit use and def to appease the machine verifier. Otherwise, uses after the if converted call could think they are reading an undefined register.
Reviewed by Matthias Braun and Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 236515
The code was basically the same here already. Just added an out parameter for a vector of seen defs so that UpdatePredRedefs can call StepForward first, then do its own post processing on the seen defs.
Will be used in the next commit to also handle regmasks.
llvm-svn: 236514
If we couldn't analyze its terminator (i.e., it's an indirectbr, or some
other weirdness), we can't safely re-if-convert a predicated block,
because we can't tell whether the predicated terminator can
fallthrough (it does).
Currently, we would completely ignore the fallthrough successor. In
the added testcase, this means we used to generate:
...
@ %entry:
cmp r5, #21
ittt ne
@ %cc1f:
cmpne r7, #42
@ %cc2t:
strne.w r5, [r8]
movne pc, r10
@ %cc1t:
...
Whereas the successor of %cc1f was originally %bb1.
With the fix, we get the correct:
...
@ %entry:
cmp r5, #21
itt eq
@ %cc1t:
streq.w r5, [r11]
moveq pc, r0
@ %cc1f:
cmp r7, #42
itt ne
@ %cc2t:
strne.w r5, [r8]
movne pc, r10
@ %bb1:
...
rdar://20192768
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8509
llvm-svn: 232872
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
BranchFolderPass was not correctly setting the basic block branch weights when
tail-merging created or merged blocks. This patch recomutes the weights of
tail-merged blocks using the following formula:
branch_weight(merged block to successor j) =
sum(block_frequency(bb) * branch_probability(bb -> j))
bb is a block that is in the set of merged blocks.
<rdar://problem/16256423>
llvm-svn: 215135
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
This commit only handles IfConvertTriangle. To update edge weights
of a successor, one interface is added to MachineBasicBlock:
/// Set successor weight of a given iterator.
setSuccWeight(succ_iterator I, uint32_t weight)
An existing testing case test/CodeGen/Thumb2/v8_IT_5.ll is updated,
since we now correctly update the edge weights, the cold block
is placed at the end of the function and we jump to the cold block.
llvm-svn: 200428
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
Some clients may add block live ins and may track liveness over a
large scope. This guarantees an efficient implementation in all cases
with no memory allocation/deallocation, independent of the number of
target registers. It could be slightly less convenient but is fine in
the expected case.
llvm-svn: 192622
When if converting something like:
true:
... = R0<kill>
false:
... = R0<kill>
then the instructions of the true block must not have a <kill> flag
anymore, as the instruction of the false block follow and do still read
the R0 value.
Specifically this patch determines the set of register live-in in the
false block (possibly after simulating the liveness changes of the
duplicated instructions). Each of these live-in registers mustn't be
killed.
llvm-svn: 192482
For targets that have instruction itineraries this means no change. Targets
that move over to the new schedule model will use be able the new schedule
module for instruction latencies in the if-converter (the logic is such that if
there is no itineary we will use the new sched model for the latencies).
Before, we queried "TTI->getInstructionLatency()" for the instruction latency
and the extra prediction cost. Now, we query the TargetSchedule abstraction for
the instruction latency and TargetInstrInfo for the extra predictation cost. The
TargetSchedule abstraction will internally call "TTI->getInstructionLatency" if
an itinerary exists, otherwise it will use the new schedule model.
ATTENTION: Out of tree targets!
(I will also send out an email later to LLVMDev)
This means, if your target implements
unsigned getInstrLatency(const InstrItineraryData *ItinData,
const MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned *PredCost);
and returns a value for "PredCost", you now also need to implement
unsigned getPredictationCost(const MachineInstr *MI);
(if your target uses the IfConversion.cpp pass)
radar://15077010
llvm-svn: 191671
Prior to this patch, IfConverter may widen the cases where a sequence of
instructions were executed because of the way it uses nested predicates. This
result in incorrect execution.
For instance, Let A be a basic block that flows conditionally into B and B be a
predicated block.
B can be predicated with A.BrToBPredicate into A iff B.Predicate is less
"permissive" than A.BrToBPredicate, i.e., iff A.BrToBPredicate subsumes
B.Predicate.
The IfConverter was checking the opposite: B.Predicate subsumes
A.BrToBPredicate.
<rdar://problem/14379453>
llvm-svn: 187071
In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.
These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.
llvm-svn: 179227
This fixes some of the cycles between libCodeGen and libSelectionDAG. It's still
a complete mess but as long as the edges consist of virtual call it doesn't
cause breakage. BasicTTI did static calls and thus broke some build
configurations.
llvm-svn: 172246
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Akira Hatanaka