The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
This revision causes tests to fail under ASAN. Since the cause of the failures
is not clear (could be ASAN, could be a Clang bug, could be a bug in this
revision), the safest course of action seems to be to revert while investigating.
llvm-svn: 357667
The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
"instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
the need to special-case stores.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 357452
Before this, we'd only emit lifetime.ends for these temps in
non-exceptional paths. This potentially made our stack larger than it
needed to be for any code that follows an EH cleanup. e.g. in
```
struct Foo { char cs[32]; };
void escape(void *);
struct Bar { ~Bar() { char cs[64]; escape(cs); } };
Foo getFoo();
void baz() {
Bar b;
getFoo();
}
```
baz() would require 96 bytes of stack, since the temporary from getFoo()
only had a lifetime.end on the non-exceptional path.
This also makes us keep hold of the Value* returned by
EmitLifetimeStart, so we don't have to remake it later.
llvm-svn: 326988
Hans Wennborg