Conversions of allocation-related operations in Standard-to-LLVM need
declarations of "malloc" and "free" (or equivalents). They use locally created
OpBuilders pointed at the module level to declare these functions if necessary.
This is poorly compatible with the pattern infrastructure that is unaware of
new operations being created. Update the insertion point of the main rewriter
instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82649
Initially, unranked memref descriptors in the LLVM dialect were designed only
to be passed into functions. An assertion was guarding against returning
unranked memrefs from functions in the standard-to-LLVM conversion. This is
insufficient for functions that wish to return an unranked memref such that the
caller does not know the rank in advance, and hence cannot allocate the
descriptor and pass it in as an argument.
Introduce a calling convention for returning unranked memref descriptors as
follows. An unranked memref descriptor always points to a ranked memref
descriptor stored on stack of the current function. When an unranked memref
descriptor is returned from a function, the ranked memref descriptor it points
to is copied to dynamically allocated memory, the ownership of which is
transferred to the caller. The caller is responsible for deallocating the
dynamically allocated memory and for copying the pointed-to ranked memref
descriptor onto its stack.
Provide default lowerings for std.return, std.call and std.indirect_call that
maintain the conversion defined above.
This convention is additionally exercised by a runtime test to guard against
memory errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82647
Using fully qualified names wherever possible avoids ambiguous class and function names. This is a follow-up to D82371.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82471
When there is a mix of affine load/store and non-affine operations (e.g. std.load, std.store),
affine-loop-fusion ignores the present of non-affine ops, thus changing the program semantics.
E.g. we have a program of three affine loops operating on the same memref in which one of them uses std.load and std.store, as follows.
```
affine.for
affine.store %1
affine.for
std.load %1
std.store %1
affine.for
affine.load %1
affine.store %1
```
affine-loop-fusion will produce the following result which changed the program semantics:
```
affine.for
std.load %1
std.store %1
affine.for
affine.store %1
affine.load %1
affine.store %1
```
This patch is to fix the above problem by checking non-affine users of the memref that are between the source and destination nodes of interest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82158
Both `AArch64TargetParser.h` and `ARMTargetParser.h` refer to
`SmallVectorImpl` without directly including the header that defines
it, which works fine until nothing else happens to include it anyway.
When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything worked well except for seeming inability to clobber r4.
The problem was that MSP430 code generator of LLVM used an obsolete name FP for that register. Things were worse because when `llc` read an unknown register name, it silently ignored it.
That is, I cannot use `fp` register name from the C code because Clang does not accept it (exactly like GCC). But the accepted name `r4` is not recognised by `llc` (it can be used in listings passed to `llvm-mc` and even `fp` is replace to `r4` by `llvm-mc`). So I can specify any of `fp` or `r4` for the string literal of `asm(...)` but nothing in the clobber list.
This patch replaces `MSP430::FP` with `MSP430::R4` in the backend code (even [MSP430 EABI](http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534/slaa534.pdf) doesn't mention FP as a register name). The R0 - R3 registers, on the other hand, are left as is in the backend code (after all, they have some special meaning on the ISA level). It is just ensured clang is renaming them as expected by the downstream tools. There is probably not much sense in **marking them clobbered** but rename them //just in case// for use at potentially different contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82184
Some parts of existing codebase assume the default `int` type to be (at least) 32 bit wide. On 16 bit targets such as MSP430 this may cause Undefined Behavior or results being defined but incorrect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81408
When calling on-the-fly passes from the legacy pass manager, the modification
status is not reported, which is a problem in case we depend on an acutal
transformation pass, and not only analyse.
Update the Legacy PM API to optionally report the changed status, assert if a
change is detected but this change is lost.
Related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81236
1) Shared writable directories like /tmp are a security problem.
2) Systems provide dedicated cache directories these days anyway.
3) This also refines LLVM's cache_directory() on Darwin platforms to use
the Darwin per-user cache directory.
Reviewers: compnerd, aprantl, jakehehrlich, espindola, respindola, ilya-biryukov, pcc, sammccall
Reviewed By: compnerd, sammccall
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82362
Summary:
Assignment and comma operators for fixed-point types were being constevaled as other
binary operators, but they need special treatment.
Reviewers: rjmccall, leonardchan, bjope
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73189
Summary:
Diagnostics for overflow were not being produced for fixed-point
evaluation. This patch refactors a bit of the evaluator and adds
a proper diagnostic for these cases.
Reviewers: rjmccall, leonardchan, bjope
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73188
This patch helps teach yaml2obj emit correct DWARF64 unit header of the .debug_info section.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82621
Summary:
`svwhilerw_bf16` and `svwhilewr_bf16` intrinsics use the scalar
`bfloat16_t`
type which is predicated on `__ARM_FEATURE_BF16_SCALAR_ARITHMETIC`. This
patch changes the feature guard from `__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16` to the
scalar bfloat feature macro.
The verify tests for `+bf16` are also removed in this patch. The purpose
of these checks was to match the SVE2 ACLE tests that look for an
implicit declaration warning if the feature isn't set. They worked when
the intrinsics were guarded on `__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BF16` as the
`bfloat16_t`
was guarded on a different macro, but with both the type and intrinsic
guarded on the same macro an earlier error is triggered in the ACLE
regarding the type and we don't get a warning as we do for SVE2.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, fpetrogalli, kmclaughlin, rengolin, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82578
Summary:
This fixes a bug in the logic for choosing the unwind plan. Based on the
comment in UnwindAssembly-x86, the intention was that a plan which
describes the function epilogue correctly does not need to be augmented
(and it should be used directly). However, the way this was implemented
(by returning false) meant that the higher level code
(FuncUnwinders::GetEHFrameAugmentedUnwindPlan) interpreted this as a
failure to produce _any_ plan and proceeded with other fallback options.
The fallback usually chosed for "asynchronous" plans was the
"instruction emulation" plan, which tended to fall over on certain
functions with multiple epilogues (that's a separate bug).
This patch simply changes the function to return true, which signals the
caller that the unmodified plan is ready to be used.
The attached test case demonstrates the case where we would previously
fall back to the instruction emulation plan, and unwind incorrectly --
the test asserts that the "augmented" eh_frame plan is used, and that
the unwind is correct.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, jankratochvil
Subscribers: davide, echristo, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82378
This function was implementing c-like promotion rules by switching on
the both types. C promotion rules are complicated, but they are not
*that* complicated -- they basically boil down to:
- wider types trump narrower ones
- unsigned trump signed
- floating point trumps integral
With a couple of helper functions, we can rewrite the function in terms
of these rules and greatly reduce the size and complexity of this
function.
Summary:
Permutation and selection bfloat16 intrinsic patterns should be guarded
on the feature flag `+bf16`. Missed in D82182 and D80850.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, fpetrogalli, kmclaughlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82492
Similar to the recent patch for fpext, this adds vcvtb and vcvtt with
insert into vector instruction selection patterns for fptruncs. This
helps clear up a lot of register shuffling that we would otherwise do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81637
Summary:
Currently, clangd always completes `typename` as `typename qualifier::name`, I think the current behavior is not useful when the code completion is triggered in `template <>`. So I tweak it to `typename identifier`.
Patch by @lh123 !
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82373
We current extract and convert from a top lane of a f16 vector using a
VMOVX;VCVTB pair. We can simplify that to use a single VCVTT. The
pattern is mostly copied from a vector extract pattern, but produces a
VCVTTHS f32 directly.
This had to move some code around so that ARMInstrVFP had access to the
required pattern frags that were previously part of ARMInstrNEON.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81556
These features implicitly enabled XSAVE in the frontend, but not
the backend. Disabling XSAVE in the frontend disabled XSAVEOPT, but
not the other 2. Nothing happened in the backend.
Fixed an issue in DataLayout::getIntPtrType where we were assuming
the input type was always a fixed vector type, which isn't true.
Added a test that exposed the problem to:
Transforms/InstCombine/vector_gep1.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82294
This lowers intrinsic @llvm.get.active.lane.mask to a setcc node, i.e. an icmp
ule, and creates vectors for its 2 arguments on which the comparison is
performed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82292
Alex Zinenko