`DIExpression` deals with `uint64_t`, so it doesn't make sense that
`createExpression()` is created from `int64_t`. Switch to `uint64_t` to
unify them.
I've temporarily left in the `int64_t` version, which forwards to the
`uint64_t` version. I'll delete it once I've updated the callers.
llvm-svn: 228619
These tests the two optimizations for backedge insertion currently implemented and the split backedge flag which is currently off by default.
llvm-svn: 228617
Without a valid data layout, deferenceable(N) doesn't get parsed or
propagated. Since this is the key item we are testing, add a dependency
on the pass.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7508
llvm-svn: 228611
This is just adding really simple tests which should have been part of the original submission. When doing so, I discovered that I'd mistakenly removed required pieces when preparing the patch for upstream submission. I fixed two such bugs in this submission.
llvm-svn: 228610
While a theoretical GC might change dereferenceability on collection,
there is no such known collector and no need to account for the case
with a flag yet.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7454
llvm-svn: 228606
5 minutes is an eternity, so try to strike a better balance between
waiting long enough for any reasonable module build and not so long that
users kill the process because they think it's hanging.
Also give the client a way to delete the lock file after a timeout.
llvm-svn: 228603
Make use of the newly introduced inst_range to clean up two loops. Clean
up a third one while at it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7455
llvm-svn: 228596
When creating a scev for sext({X,+,Y}), scev checks if the expression
is equivalent to {sext X,+,zext Y}. If it can prove that, it also
tags the original {X,+,Y} as <nsw>, which is not correct.
In the test case I run `-scalar-evolution` twice because the bug
manifests only once SCEV has run through and seen the `sext`
expressions (and then does a in-place mutation on {X,+,Y}).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7495
llvm-svn: 228586
As far as I can tell r228568 was the right workaround, and r228567 was
unnecessary. If reverting this causes problems on the bots I'll reinstate it.
llvm-svn: 228585
veqv (vector equivalence)
vnand
vorc
I increased the AddedComplexity for these instructions to 500 to ensure they are generated instead of issuing other VSX instructions.
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7469
llvm-svn: 228580
For the attached test case different types are used in the ICmpInst
and SelectInst that represent the min/max expressions. However, if the
ICmpInst type is smaller a comparison with the sign/zero extended
operands would have yielded the same result. This situation might
arise after the instruction combination pass was applied.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7338
llvm-svn: 228572
Apparently gcc-4.7.2 is touchy about 'this' appearing in a lambda capture list
along with other captures. I've rewritten my captures to try to avoid the issue.
llvm-svn: 228567
wrong basic block.
This would happen when the result of an invoke was used by a phi instruction
in the invoke's normal destination block. An instruction to reload the invoke's
value would get inserted before the critical edge was split and a new basic
block (which is the correct insertion point for the reload) was created. This
commit fixes the bug by splitting the critical edge before all the reload
instructions are inserted.
Also, hoist up the code which computes the insertion point to the only place
that need that computation.
rdar://problem/15978721
llvm-svn: 228566
Some parts of DeadArgElim were only considering the individual fields
of StructTypes separately, but others (where insertvalue &
extractvalue instructions occur) also looked into ArrayTypes.
This one is an actual bug; the mismatch can lead to an argument being
considered used by a return sub-value that isn't being tracked (and
hence is dead by default). It then gets incorrectly eliminated.
llvm-svn: 228559
Previously, a non-extractvalue use of an aggregate return value meant
the entire return was considered live (the algorithm gave up
entirely). This was correct, but conservative. It's better to actually
look at that Use, making the analysis results apply to all sub-values
under consideration.
E.g.
%val = call { i32, i32 } @whatever()
[...]
ret { i32, i32 } %val
The return is using the entire aggregate (sub-values 0 and 1). We can
still simplify @whatever if we can prove that this return is itself
unused.
Also unifies the logic slightly between aggregate and non-aggregate
cases..
llvm-svn: 228558
This patch refactors a key piece of the Orc APIs: It removes the
*::getSymbolAddress and *::lookupSymbolAddressIn methods, which returned target
addresses (uint64_ts), and replaces them with *::findSymbol and *::findSymbolIn
respectively, which return instances of the new JITSymbol type. Unlike the old
methods, calling findSymbol or findSymbolIn does not cause the symbol to be
immediately materialized when found. Instead, the symbol will be materialized
if/when the getAddress method is called on the returned JITSymbol. This allows
us to query for the existence of symbols without actually materializing them. In
the future I expect more information to be attached to the JITSymbol class, for
example whether the returned symbol is a weak or strong definition. This will
allow us to properly handle weak symbols and multiple definitions.
llvm-svn: 228557
Make assume (load (call|invoke) != null) set nonNull return attribute
for the call and invoke. Also include tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7107
llvm-svn: 228556
add recurrences don't overflow.
This change makes the optimization more restrictive. It still assumes
that an overflowing `add nsw` is undefined behavior; and this change
will need revisiting once we have a consistent semantics for poison
values.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7331
llvm-svn: 228552
Dumping a symbol often requires access to data that isn't inside
the symbol hierarchy, but which is only accessible through the
top-level session. This patch is a pure interface change to give
symbols a reference to the session.
llvm-svn: 228542
Summary:
The alias.scope metadata represents sets of things an instruction might
alias with. When generically combining the metadata from two
instructions the result must be the union of the original sets, because
the new instruction might alias with anything any of the original
instructions aliased with.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7490
llvm-svn: 228525
Gather and Scatter are new introduced intrinsics, comming after recently implemented masked load and store.
This is the first patch for Gather and Scatter intrinsics. It includes only the syntax, parsing and verification.
Gather and Scatter intrinsics allow to perform multiple memory accesses (read/write) in one vector instruction.
The intrinsics are not target specific and will have the following syntax:
Gather:
declare <16 x i32> @llvm.masked.gather.v16i32(<16 x i32*> <vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <16 x i1> <mask>, <16 x i32> <passthru>)
declare <8 x float> @llvm.masked.gather.v8f32(<8 x float*><vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <8 x i1> <mask>, <8 x float><passthru>)
Scatter:
declare void @llvm.masked.scatter.v8i32(<8 x i32><vector value to be stored> , <8 x i32*><vector of ptrs> , i32 <alignment>, <8 x i1> <mask>)
declare void @llvm.masked.scatter.v16i32(<16 x i32> <vector value to be stored> , <16 x i32*> <vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <16 x i1><mask> )
Vector of ptrs - a set of source/destination addresses, to load/store the value.
Mask - switches on/off vector lanes to prevent memory access for switched-off lanes
vector of ptrs, value and mask should have the same vector width.
These are code examples where gather / scatter should be used and will allow function vectorization
;void foo1(int * restrict A, int * restrict B, int * restrict C) {
; for (int i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
; A[i] = B[C[i]];
; }
;}
;void foo3(int * restrict A, int * restrict B) {
; for (int i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
; A[B[i]] = i+5;
; }
;}
Tests will come in the following patches, with CodeGen and Vectorizer.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7433
llvm-svn: 228521
While various DAG combines try to guarantee that a vector SETCC
operation will have the same output size as input, there's nothing
intrinsic to either creation or LegalizeTypes that actually guarantees
it, so the function needs to be ready to handle a mismatch.
Fortunately this is easy enough, just extend or truncate the naturally
compared result.
I couldn't reproduce the failure in other backends that I know have
SIMD, so it's probably only an issue for these two due to shared
heritage.
Should fix PR21645.
llvm-svn: 228518
This patch implements a few of the optional suggestions from the
initial patch comitting libpdb. In particular, it implements a
virtual function out of line for each of the concrete classes.
A few other minor cleanups exist as well, such as using override
instead of virtual, etc.
llvm-svn: 228516
The only difference between deleteIfDeadInstruction and
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions is that the former also
manually invalidates SCEV. That's unnecessary because SCEV automatically
gets informed when an instruction is deleted via a ValueHandle. NFC.
llvm-svn: 228508
heap. Problem identified by Guido Vranken. Changes differ from original
OpenBSD sources by not depending on non-portable reallocarray.
llvm-svn: 228507
different fields.
We can show that two GEPs off of the same (possibly multidimensional)
array of structs, into different fields, can't alias. Quoting:
For two GEPOperators GEP1 and GEP2, if we find that:
- both GEPs begin indexing from the exact same pointer;
- the last indices in both GEPs are constants, indexing into a struct;
- said indices are different, hence,the pointed-to fields are different;
- and both GEPs only index through arrays prior to that;
this lets us determine that the struct that GEP1 indexes into and the
struct that GEP2 indexes into must either precisely overlap or be
completely disjoint. Because they cannot partially overlap, indexing
into different non-overlapping fields of the struct will never alias.
The other BasicAA::aliasGEP rules worked in some cases, but not all
(for example, the i32x3 struct in the testcase).
We can add this simple ad-hoc rule to complement them.
rdar://19717375
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7453
llvm-svn: 228498
COFF section flags are not idempotent:
'rd' will make a read-write section because 'd' implies write
'dr' will make a read-only section because 'r' disables write
llvm-svn: 228490
If a loop predecessor has an invoke as its terminator, and the return value
from that invoke is used to determine the loop iteration space, then we can't
insert a computation based on that value in the loop predecessor prior to the
terminator (oops). If there's such an invoke, or just no predecessor for that
matter, insert a new loop preheader.
llvm-svn: 228488
These were originally submitted as part of r228428, but this part
caused a build breakage in LLVMConfig. The library portion was
resubmitted independently since it was not causing breakage.
There were two reasons this was causing the build to fail. The
first is that there were no Makefiles added for the PDB tests. And
the second is that the DebugInfoPDB library was only being built by
CMake behind an "if (MSVC)" check. This is wrong since this the
library hides platform specific details, and it was causing
LLVM-Config to not find the library when trying to build unittests.
llvm-svn: 228482
Philip Reames