This patch adds the SVE built-in types defined by the Procedure Call
Standard for the Arm Architecture:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100986/0000
It handles the types in all relevant places that deal with built-in types.
At the moment, some of these places bail out with an error, including:
(1) trying to generate LLVM IR for the types
(2) trying to generate debug info for the types
(3) trying to mangle the types using the Microsoft C++ ABI
(4) trying to @encode the types in Objective C
(1) and (2) are fixed by follow-on patches but (unlike this patch)
they deal mostly with target-specific LLVM details, so seemed like
a logically separate change. There is currently no spec for (3) and
(4), so reporting an error seems like the correct behaviour for now.
The intention is that the types will become sizeless types:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062523.html
The main purpose of the sizeless type extension is to diagnose
impossible or dangerous uses of the types, such as any that would
require sizeof to have a meaningful defined value.
Until then, the patch sets the alignments of the types to the values
specified in the link above. It also sets the sizes of the types to
zero, which is chosen to be consistently wrong and shouldn't affect
correctly-written code (i.e. code that would compile even with the
sizeless type extension).
The patch adds the common subset of functionality needed to test the
sizeless type extension on the one hand and to provide SVE intrinsic
functions on the other. After this patch, the two pieces of work are
essentially independent.
The patch is based on one by Graham Hunter:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62960
llvm-svn: 368413
Summary:
An inline asm call may result in an immediate input value after inlining.
Therefore, don't emit a diagnostic here if the input isn't an immediate.
Reviewers: joerg, eli.friedman, rsmith
Subscribers: asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, s.egerton, krytarowski, mgorny, riccibruno, eraman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60943
llvm-svn: 368104
This patch extends some existing warnings to utilize the knowledge about the gsl::Pointer and gsl::Owner attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64256
llvm-svn: 368072
A buildbot got angry about this new test, with error messages like:
warn-nullchar-nullptr.c Line 16: use of undeclared identifier 'u'
It looks like this `u'c'` syntax was introduced in C11; I'm guessing
some bots may default to something before that. Let's see if explicitly
specifying the standard version makes it happy...
llvm-svn: 367947
This patch adds a warning that diagnoses comparisons of pointers to
'\0'. This is often indicative of a bug (e.g. the user might've
forgotten to dereference the pointer).
Patch by Elaina Guan!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65595
llvm-svn: 367940
Summary:
It warns for for comments like
/** \pre \em */
where \em has no argument
This warning is enabled with the -Wdocumentation option.
Reviewers: gribozavr, rsmith
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64696
Patch by Mark de Wever.
llvm-svn: 367809
Summary:
The -Wparentheses warnings are enabled by default in clang but they are under
-Wall in gcc (gcc/c-family/c.opt). Some of the operator precedence warnings are
oftentimes criticized as noise (clang: default; gcc: -Wall). If a warning is
very controversial, it is probably not a good idea to enable it by default.
This patch disables the rather annoying ones:
-Wbitwise-op-parentheses, e.g. i & i | i
-Wlogical-op-parentheses, e.g. i && i || i
After this change:
```
* = enabled by default
-Wall
-Wparentheses
-Wlogical-op-parentheses
-Wlogical-not-parentheses*
-Wbitwise-op-parentheses
-Wshift-op-parentheses*
-Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses*
-Wparentheses-equality*
-Wdangling-else*
```
-Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses is typically followed by overload
resolution failure. We can instead improve the error message, and
probably delete -Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses in the future. Keep it
for now because it gives some diagnostics.
Reviewers: akyrtzi, jyknight, rtrieu, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65192
llvm-svn: 367690
Issue an warning when the code tries to do an implicit int -> float
conversion, where the float type ha a narrower significant than the
float type.
The new warning is controlled by flag -Wimplicit-int-float-conversion,
under -Wimplicit-float-conversion and -Wconversion. It is also silenced
when c++11 narrowing warning is issued.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666
llvm-svn: 367497
This adds support for parsing/emitting in IR the floating-point RISC-V
registers in inline assembly clobber lists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64737
llvm-svn: 367399
If we detect a built-in declaration for which we cannot derive a type
matching the pattern in the Builtins.def file, we currently emit a
warning that the respective header is needed. However, this is not
necessarily the behavior we want as it has no connection to the location
of the declaration (which can actually be in the header in question).
Instead, this warning is generated
- if we could not build the type for the pattern on file (for some
reason). Here we should make the reason explicit. The actual problem
is otherwise circumvented as the warning is misleading, see [0] for
an example.
- if we could not build the type for the pattern because we do not
have a type on record, possible since D55483, we should not emit any
warning. See [1] for a legitimate problem.
This patch address both cases. For the "setjmp" family a new warning is
introduced and for built-ins without type on record, so far
"pthread_create", we do not emit the warning anymore.
Also see: PR40692
[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/11/718
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235583
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58091
llvm-svn: 367387
This CL adds an optional warning to diagnose uses of the
`__builtin_alloca` family of functions. The use of these functions is
discouraged by many, so it seems like a good idea to allow clang to warn
about it.
Patch by Elaina Guan!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64883
llvm-svn: 367067
This reverts commit r366972 which broke the following tests:
Clang :: CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.list/p7-0x.cpp
Clang :: CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.list/p7-cxx11-nowarn.cpp
llvm-svn: 366979
Issue an warning when the code tries to do an implicit int -> float
conversion, where the float type ha a narrower significant than the
float type.
The new warning is controlled by flag -Wimplicit-int-float-conversion,
under -Wimplicit-float-conversion and -Wconversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666
llvm-svn: 366972
As discussed in D64780 the wording of this warning message is being
changed to say 'is not supported' instead of 'ignored', and the
diag ID itself is being changed to warn_cconv_not_supported.
llvm-svn: 366368
The original commit is r366076. It is temporarily reverted (r366155)
due to test failure. This resubmit makes test more robust by accepting
regex instead of hardcoded names/references in several places.
This is a followup patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D61809.
Handle unnamed bitfield properly and add more test cases.
Fixed the unnamed bitfield issue. The unnamed bitfield is ignored
by debug info, so we need to ignore such a struct/union member
when we try to get the member index in the debug info.
D61809 contains two test cases but not enough as it does
not checking generated IRs in the fine grain level, and also
it does not have semantics checking tests.
This patch added unit tests for both code gen and semantics checking for
the new intrinsic.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 366231
Summary:
D28148 relaxed some checks for assigning { 0 } to a structure for all C
standards, but it failed to handle structures with non-integer
subobjects. Relax -Wmissing-braces checks for such structures, and add
some additional tests.
This fixes PR39931.
Patch By: al3xtjames
Reviewed By: Lekensteyn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61838
llvm-svn: 366163
This is a followup patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D61809.
Handle unnamed bitfield properly and add more test cases.
Fixed the unnamed bitfield issue. The unnamed bitfield is ignored
by debug info, so we need to ignore such a struct/union member
when we try to get the member index in the debug info.
D61809 contains two test cases but not enough as it does
not checking generated IRs in the fine grain level, and also
it does not have semantics checking tests.
This patch added unit tests for both code gen and semantics checking for
the new intrinsic.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 366076
Ignore trailing NullStmts in compound expressions when determining the result type and value. This is to match the GCC behavior which ignores semicolons at the end of compound expressions.
Patch by Dominic Ferreira.
llvm-svn: 365498
On macOS, BOOL is a typedef for signed char, but it should never hold a value
that isn't 1 or 0. Any code that expects a different value in their BOOL should
be fixed.
rdar://51954400
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63856
llvm-svn: 365408
Summary:
I've found that most often the proper way to fix this warning is to add
`static`, because if the code otherwise compiles and links, the function
or variable is apparently not needed outside of the TU.
We can't provide a fix-it hint for variable declarations, because
multiple VarDecls can share the same type, and if we put static in front
of that, we affect all declared variables, some of which might have
previous declarations.
We also provide no fix-it hint for the rare case of an `extern` function
definition, because that would require removing `extern` and I have no
idea how to get the source location of the storage class specifier from
a FunctionDecl. I believe this information is only available earlier in
the AST construction from DeclSpec::getStorageClassSpecLoc(), but we
don't have that here.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59402
llvm-svn: 363749
Summary:
There was a search for non-prototype declarations for the function, but
we only showed the results for zero-parameter functions. Now we show the
note for functions with parameters as well, but we omit the fix-it hint
suggesting to add `void`.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62750
llvm-svn: 363748
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 20: array initializer must be an initializer list
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: array initializer must be an initializer list
It turns out the definition is wrong, as can be seen in GCC's gcc/config/sol2.h:
/* wchar_t is called differently in <wchar.h> for 32 and 64-bit
compilations. This is called for by SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-65
(32-bit) and p. 6P-10, Figure 6.38 (64-bit). */
#undef WCHAR_TYPE
#define WCHAR_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
The following patch implements this, and at the same time corrects the wint_t
definition which is the same:
/* Same for wint_t. See SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-66 (32-bit). There's
no corresponding 64-bit definition, but this is what Solaris 8
<iso/wchar_iso.h> uses. */
#undef WINT_TYPE
#define WINT_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
Clang :: Preprocessor/wchar_t.c and Clang :: Sema/format-strings.c need to
be adjusted to account for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62944
llvm-svn: 363612
Functions using stdcall, fastcall, or vectorcall with C linkage mangle
in the size of the parameter pack. Calculating the size of the pack
requires the parameter types to complete, which may require template
instantiation.
Previously, we would crash during IRgen when requesting the size of
incomplete or uninstantiated types, as in this reduced example:
struct Foo;
void __fastcall bar(struct Foo o);
void (__fastcall *fp)(struct Foo) = &bar;
Reported in Chromium here: https://crbug.com/971245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62975
llvm-svn: 363000
Seems like a logical extension to me - and of interest because it might
help reduce the debug info size of libc++ by applying this attribute to
type traits that have a disproportionate debug info cost compared to the
benefit (& possibly harm/confusion) they cause users.
llvm-svn: 362856
As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42113, there are a
number of locations in Clang where it is assumed that exception
specifications are only valid in C++ mode. Since the original
justification for the NoThrow Exception Specifier Type was C++ related,
this patch just makes C mode use the attribute-based nothrow handling.
Additionally, I noticed that the handling of non-prototype functions
regressed the behavior of the nothrow attribute, in part because it is
was listed in the function type macro(which I did in the previous
patch). In reality, it should only be doing so in a conditional nature,
so this patch removes it there and puts it directly in the switch to be
handled correctly.
llvm-svn: 362607
Add a test for tracking PR41027 (8.0 regression breaking assembly code
relying on __builtin_constant_p() to identify compile-time constants).
Mark it as expected to fail everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60728
llvm-svn: 362587
Syntax:
asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate
:
: InputOperands
: Clobbers
: GotoLabels)
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm
For:
asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop);
IR:
callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3
asm.fallthrough:
Compiler need to generate:
1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label.
2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number".
Diagnostic
1> duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label.
2> goto out of scope.
llvm-svn: 362045
These don't support embedded rounding so we shouldn't be setting HasRC. That way we only
allow current direction and suppress all exceptions.
llvm-svn: 361897
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
declaration.
It should emit _only_ an implicit-function-declaration warning, not
both of them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59711
llvm-svn: 360084
where either the modification or the other access is unreachable.
This reverts r359984 (which reverted r359962). The bug in clang-tidy's
test suite exposed by the original commit was fixed in r360009.
llvm-svn: 360010
__builtin_constant_p.
If the operand of __builtin_constant_p is not constant and has
side-effects, then code controlled by a branch on it is unreachable and
we should not emit runtime behavior warnings in such code.
llvm-svn: 359844
If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
Summary:
GCC's -Wtype-limits (part of -Wextra):
Warn if a comparison is always true or always false due to the limited range of the data type
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri, thakis
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841
llvm-svn: 359516
This provides intrinsics support for Memory Tagging Extension (MTE),
which was introduced with the Armv8.5-a architecture.
These intrinsics are available when __ARM_FEATURE_MEMORY_TAGGING is defined.
Each intrinsic is described in detail in the ACLE Q1 2019 documentation:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest
Reviewed By: Tim Nortover, David Spickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60485
llvm-svn: 359348
Summary:
This patch implements `__builtin_is_constant_evaluated` as specifier by [P0595R2](https://wg21.link/p0595r2). It is built on the back of Bill Wendling's work for `__builtin_constant_p()`.
More tests to come, but early feedback is appreciated.
I plan to implement warnings for common mis-usages like those belowe in a following patch:
```
void foo(int x) {
if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated())) { // condition is always `true`. Should use plain `if` instead.
foo_constexpr(x);
} else {
foo_runtime(x);
}
}
```
Reviewers: rsmith, MaskRay, bruno, void
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, zoecarver, fdeazeve, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55500
llvm-svn: 359067
Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely
checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually
signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so
are also affected.
This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and
isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type
is signed.
A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch,
these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses
like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but
not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to
assume `true` should be accepted.
This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due
to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and
SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object
size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and
OpenMP array section validation.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712
llvm-svn: 359012
We want to make objc_nonlazy_class apply to implementations, but ran into this.
There doesn't seem to be any reason that this isn't supported.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60542
llvm-svn: 358200
This fixes a false positive on the following, where st is configured to have
different sizes based on some preprocessor logic:
if (sizeof(buf) == sizeof(*st))
memcpy(&buf, st, sizeof(*st));
llvm-svn: 357041
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rL355317 we noticed that quite a decent
amount of code redeclares builtins (memcpy in particular, I believe
reduced from an MSVC header) with a calling convention specified.
This gets particularly troublesome when the user specifies a new
'default' calling convention on the command line.
When looking to add a diagnostic for this case, it was noticed that we
had 3 other diagnostics that differed only slightly. This patch ALSO
unifies those under a 'select'. Unfortunately, the order of words in
ONE of these diagnostics was reversed ("'thiscall' calling convention"
vs "calling convention 'thiscall'"), so this patch also standardizes on
the former.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59560
Change-Id: I79f99fe7c2301640755ffdd774b46eb44526bb22
llvm-svn: 356663
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
The attribute pass_dynamic_object_size(n) behaves exactly like
pass_object_size(n), but instead of evaluating __builtin_object_size on calls,
it evaluates __builtin_dynamic_object_size, which has the potential to produce
runtime code when the object size can't be determined statically.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58757
llvm-svn: 356515
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
These diagnose overflowing calls to subset of fortifiable functions. Some
functions, like sprintf or strcpy aren't supported right not, but we should
probably support these in the future. We previously supported this kind of
functionality with -Wbuiltin-memcpy-chk-size, but that diagnostic doesn't work
with _FORTIFY implementations that use wrapper functions. Also unlike that
diagnostic, we emit these warnings regardless of whether _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
actually enabled, which is nice for programs that don't enable the runtime
checks.
Why not just use diagnose_if, like Bionic does? We can get better diagnostics in
the compiler (i.e. mention the sizes), and we have the potential to diagnose
sprintf and strcpy which is impossible with diagnose_if (at least, in languages
that don't support C++14 constexpr). This approach also saves standard libraries
from having to add diagnose_if.
rdar://48006655
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797
llvm-svn: 356397
llvm-svn 356197 relanded previously failing test case max_align.c.
This commit will reland the rest of llvm-svn 356060 commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59048
llvm-svn: 356208
This reverts commit r353765. After talking with our c stdlib folks, we decided
to use the existing pass_object_size attribute to implement _FORTIFY_SOURCE
wrappers, like Bionic does (I didn't realize that pass_object_size could be used
for this purpose). Sorry for the flip/flop, and thanks to James Y. Knight for
pointing this out to me.
llvm-svn: 356103
Summary:
A first pass over platform-specific properties of the C API/ABI
on AIX for both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
This is a continuation of D18360 by Andrew Paprocki and further work by Wu Zhao.
Patch by Andus Yu
Reviewers: apaprocki, chandlerc, hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu,
xingxue, sfertile
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, apaprocki, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59048
llvm-svn: 356060
Apparently GCC allows this, and there's code relying on it (see bug).
The idea is to allow expression that would have been allowed if they
were cast to int. So I based the code on how such a cast would be done
(the CK_PointerToIntegral case in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58821
llvm-svn: 355491
The current constraint logic is both too lax and too strict. It fails
for input outside the [INT_MIN..INT_MAX] range, but it also implicitly
accepts 0 as value when it should not. Adjust logic to handle both
correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58649
llvm-svn: 354937
statements.
If the assembler instruction is not generated and the delayed diagnostic
is emitted, we may end up with extra warning message for variables used
in the asm statement. Since the asm statement is not built, the
variables may be left non-referenced and it may produce a warning about
a use of the non-initialized variables.
llvm-svn: 354928
The new __attribute__ ((mig_server_routine)) is going to be used for annotating
Mach Interface Generator (MIG) callback functions as such, so that additional
static analysis could be applied to their implementations. It can also be
applied to regular functions behavior of which is supposed to be identical to
that of a MIG server routine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58365
llvm-svn: 354530
...instead of just comparing rank. Also, fix a bad warning about
_Float16, since its declared out of order in BuiltinTypes.def,
meaning comparing rank using BuiltinType::getKind() is incorrect.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58254
llvm-svn: 354190
D54902 removed CallExpr::setNumArgs in preparation of tail-allocating the
arguments of CallExpr. It did this by allocating storage for
max(number of arguments, number of parameters in the prototype). The
temporarily nulled arguments however causes issues in BuildResolvedCallExpr
when typo correction is done just after the creation of the call expression.
This was unfortunately missed by the tests /:
To fix this, delay setting the number of arguments to
max(number of arguments, number of parameters in the prototype) until we are
ready for it. It would be nice to have this encapsulated in CallExpr but this
is the best I can come up with under the constraint that we cannot add
anything the CallExpr.
Fixes PR40286.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57948
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 354035
The rationale of this change is to fix _Unwind_Word / _Unwind_SWord
definitions for MIPS N32 ABI. This ABI uses 32-bit pointers,
but _Unwind_Word and _Unwind_SWord types are eight bytes long.
# The __attribute__((__mode__(__unwind_word__))) is added to the type
definitions. It makes them equal to the corresponding definitions used
by GCC and allows to override types using `getUnwindWordWidth` function.
# The `getUnwindWordWidth` virtual function override in the `MipsTargetInfo`
class and provides correct type size values.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58165
llvm-svn: 353965
Summary: See the added test for a repro.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58111
llvm-svn: 353840
This attribute applies to declarations of C stdlib functions
(sprintf, memcpy...) that have known fortified variants
(__sprintf_chk, __memcpy_chk, ...). When applied, clang will emit
calls to the fortified variant functions instead of calls to the
defaults.
In GCC, this is done by adding gnu_inline-style wrapper functions,
but that doesn't work for us for variadic functions because we don't
support __builtin_va_arg_pack (and have no intention to).
This attribute takes two arguments, the first is 'type' argument
passed through to __builtin_object_size, and the second is a flag
argument that gets passed through to the variadic checking variants.
rdar://47905754
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57918
llvm-svn: 353765
This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the
potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a
drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when
a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance,
__builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the
following function:
void f(size_t alloc) {
char* p = malloc(alloc);
strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0))
}
This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the
object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to
-1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to
__builtin___strcpy_chk.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760
llvm-svn: 352665
Re-enable format string warnings on printf.
The warnings are still incomplete. Apparently it is undefined to use a
vector specifier without a length modifier, which is not currently
warned on. Additionally, type warnings appear to not be working with
the hh modifier, and aren't warning on all of the special restrictions
from c99 printf.
llvm-svn: 352540
Fix a bug where we would compare array sizes with incompatible
element types, and look through explicit casts.
rdar://44800168
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57064
llvm-svn: 352239
As Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129543.html
There are problems exposing the _Float16 type on architectures that
haven't defined the ABI/ISel for the type yet, so we're temporarily
disabling the type and making it opt-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57188
Change-Id: I5db7366dedf1deb9485adb8948b1deb7e612a736
llvm-svn: 352221
I discovered that in ICC (where this list comes from), that the two
pentium_iii versions were actually identical despite the two different
names (despite them implying a difference). Because of this, they ended
up having identical manglings, which obviously caused problems when used
together.
This patch makes pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs an alias for pentium_iii so
that it can still be used, but has the same meaning as ICC. However, we
still prohibit using the two together which is different (albeit better)
behavior.
Change-Id: I4f3c9a47e48490c81525c8a3d23ed4201921b288
llvm-svn: 352054
With commit r351627, LLVM gained the ability to apply (existing) IPO
optimizations on indirections through callbacks, or transitive calls.
The general idea is that we use an abstraction to hide the middle man
and represent the callback call in the context of the initial caller.
It is described in more detail in the commit message of the LLVM patch
r351627, the llvm::AbstractCallSite class description, and the
language reference section on callback-metadata.
This commit enables clang to emit !callback metadata that is
understood by LLVM. It does so in three different cases:
1) For known broker functions declarations that are directly
generated, e.g., __kmpc_fork_call for the OpenMP pragma parallel.
2) For known broker functions that are identified by their name and
source location through the builtin detection, e.g.,
pthread_create from the POSIX thread API.
3) For user annotated functions that carry the "callback(callee, ...)"
attribute. The attribute has to include the name, or index, of
the callback callee and how the passed arguments can be
identified (as many as the callback callee has). See the callback
attribute documentation for detailed information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55483
llvm-svn: 351629
As of r343360, we support fixed-enums in C. This lead to some
warnings in project headers where a fixed enum is forward declared
then later defined. In C++, this is fine, the forward declaration is
treated as a complete type even though the definition isn't present.
We use this rule in C too, but still warn about the forward
declaration anyways. This patch suppresses the warning.
rdar://problem/47356469
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56879
llvm-svn: 351595
* Accept as an argument constants in range 0..63 (aligned with TI headers and linker scripts provided with TI GCC toolchain).
* Emit function attribute 'interrupt'='xx' instead of aliases (used in the backend to create a section for particular interrupt vector).
* Add more diagnostics.
Patch by Kristina Bessonova!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56663
llvm-svn: 351344
r347812 permitted forward declarations for cpu-dispatch functions, which
are occassionally useful as exposition in header files. However, this inadvertently
permitted this function to become multiversioned after a usage. This
patch ensures that the "CausesMV" checks are still run in the
forward-declaration case.
Change-Id: Icb6f975a2d068f088b89e3bbe26cf1d24f5a972c
llvm-svn: 351212
Mention the deployment target, and don't say "partial" which doesn't
really mean anything to users.
rdar://problem/33601513
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56523
llvm-svn: 351108
While building openJDK11u, it seems that some of the code in the
native core libraries make liberal use of integer to pointer
comparisons. We currently have no flag to disabled this warning.
This add such a flag.
Patch by Kader (abdoul-kader keita)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241
llvm-svn: 351082
When applied to out-parameters, the attributes specify the expected lifetime of the written-into object.
Additionally, introduce OSReturnsRetainedOn(Non)Zero attributes, which
specify that an ownership transfer happens depending on a return code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56292
llvm-svn: 350942
Summary:
Prevents -Wunneeded-internal-delcaration warnings when the target has no
other references. This occurs frequently in device drivers in the Linux
kernel.
Sema would need to invoke the demangler on the target, since in C++ the
target name is mangled:
int f() { return 42; }
int g() __attribute__((alias("_Z1fv")));
Sema does not have the ability to demangle names at this time.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39088https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/232
Reviewers: rsmith, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, cfe-commits, pirama, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54188
llvm-svn: 350776
This patch adds #pragma clang loop pipeline and #pragma clang loop pipeline_initiation_interval for debugging or reducing compile time purposes. It is possible to disable SWP for concrete loops to save compilation time or to find bugs by not doing SWP to certain loops. It is possible to set value of initiation interval to concrete number to save compilation time by not doing extra pipeliner passes or to check created schedule for specific initiation interval.
Patch by Alexey Lapshin.
llvm-svn: 350414
CPUSpecifc/CPUDispatch call resolution assumed that all declarations
that would be passed are valid, however this was an invalid assumption.
This patch deals with those situations by making the valid version take
priority. Note that the checked ordering is arbitrary, since both are
replaced by calls to the resolver later.
Change-Id: I7ff2ec88c55a721d51bc1f39ea1a1fe242b4e45f
llvm-svn: 350398
Namespaces are introduced by adding an "identifier." before a
push/pop directive. Pop directives with namespaces can only pop a
attribute group that was pushed with the same namespace. Push and pop
directives that don't opt into namespaces have the same semantics.
This is necessary to prevent a pitfall of using multiple #pragma
clang attribute directives spread out in a large file, particularly
when macros are involved. It isn't easy to see which pop corripsonds
to which push, so its easy to inadvertently pop the wrong group.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55628
llvm-svn: 349845
Only explicitly look through integer and floating-point promotion where the result type is actually a promotion, which is not always the case for bit-fields in C.
Patch by Bevin Hansson.
llvm-svn: 349497
Summary:
Add an option to initialize automatic variables with either a pattern or with
zeroes. The default is still that automatic variables are uninitialized. Also
add attributes to request uninitialized on a per-variable basis, mainly to disable
initialization of large stack arrays when deemed too expensive.
This isn't meant to change the semantics of C and C++. Rather, it's meant to be
a last-resort when programmers inadvertently have some undefined behavior in
their code. This patch aims to make undefined behavior hurt less, which
security-minded people will be very happy about. Notably, this means that
there's no inadvertent information leak when:
- The compiler re-uses stack slots, and a value is used uninitialized.
- The compiler re-uses a register, and a value is used uninitialized.
- Stack structs / arrays / unions with padding are copied.
This patch only addresses stack and register information leaks. There's many
more infoleaks that we could address, and much more undefined behavior that
could be tamed. Let's keep this patch focused, and I'm happy to address related
issues elsewhere.
To keep the patch simple, only some `undef` is removed for now, see
`replaceUndef`. The padding-related infoleaks are therefore not all gone yet.
This will be addressed in a follow-up, mainly because addressing padding-related
leaks should be a stand-alone option which is implied by variable
initialization.
There are three options when it comes to automatic variable initialization:
0. Uninitialized
This is C and C++'s default. It's not changing. Depending on code
generation, a programmer who runs into undefined behavior by using an
uninialized automatic variable may observe any previous value (including
program secrets), or any value which the compiler saw fit to materialize on
the stack or in a register (this could be to synthesize an immediate, to
refer to code or data locations, to generate cookies, etc).
1. Pattern initialization
This is the recommended initialization approach. Pattern initialization's
goal is to initialize automatic variables with values which will likely
transform logic bugs into crashes down the line, are easily recognizable in
a crash dump, without being values which programmers can rely on for useful
program semantics. At the same time, pattern initialization tries to
generate code which will optimize well. You'll find the following details in
`patternFor`:
- Integers are initialized with repeated 0xAA bytes (infinite scream).
- Vectors of integers are also initialized with infinite scream.
- Pointers are initialized with infinite scream on 64-bit platforms because
it's an unmappable pointer value on architectures I'm aware of. Pointers
are initialize to 0x000000AA (small scream) on 32-bit platforms because
32-bit platforms don't consistently offer unmappable pages. When they do
it's usually the zero page. As people try this out, I expect that we'll
want to allow different platforms to customize this, let's do so later.
- Vectors of pointers are initialized the same way pointers are.
- Floating point values and vectors are initialized with a negative quiet
NaN with repeated 0xFF payload (e.g. 0xffffffff and 0xffffffffffffffff).
NaNs are nice (here, anways) because they propagate on arithmetic, making
it more likely that entire computations become NaN when a single
uninitialized value sneaks in.
- Arrays are initialized to their homogeneous elements' initialization
value, repeated. Stack-based Variable-Length Arrays (VLAs) are
runtime-initialized to the allocated size (no effort is made for negative
size, but zero-sized VLAs are untouched even if technically undefined).
- Structs are initialized to their heterogeneous element's initialization
values. Zero-size structs are initialized as 0xAA since they're allocated
a single byte.
- Unions are initialized using the initialization for the largest member of
the union.
Expect the values used for pattern initialization to change over time, as we
refine heuristics (both for performance and security). The goal is truly to
avoid injecting semantics into undefined behavior, and we should be
comfortable changing these values when there's a worthwhile point in doing
so.
Why so much infinite scream? Repeated byte patterns tend to be easy to
synthesize on most architectures, and otherwise memset is usually very
efficient. For values which aren't entirely repeated byte patterns, LLVM
will often generate code which does memset + a few stores.
2. Zero initialization
Zero initialize all values. This has the unfortunate side-effect of
providing semantics to otherwise undefined behavior, programs therefore
might start to rely on this behavior, and that's sad. However, some
programmers believe that pattern initialization is too expensive for them,
and data might show that they're right. The only way to make these
programmers wrong is to offer zero-initialization as an option, figure out
where they are right, and optimize the compiler into submission. Until the
compiler provides acceptable performance for all security-minded code, zero
initialization is a useful (if blunt) tool.
I've been asked for a fourth initialization option: user-provided byte value.
This might be useful, and can easily be added later.
Why is an out-of band initialization mecanism desired? We could instead use
-Wuninitialized! Indeed we could, but then we're forcing the programmer to
provide semantics for something which doesn't actually have any (it's
uninitialized!). It's then unclear whether `int derp = 0;` lends meaning to `0`,
or whether it's just there to shut that warning up. It's also way easier to use
a compiler flag than it is to manually and intelligently initialize all values
in a program.
Why not just rely on static analysis? Because it cannot reason about all dynamic
code paths effectively, and it has false positives. It's a great tool, could get
even better, but it's simply incapable of catching all uses of uninitialized
values.
Why not just rely on memory sanitizer? Because it's not universally available,
has a 3x performance cost, and shouldn't be deployed in production. Again, it's
a great tool, it'll find the dynamic uses of uninitialized variables that your
test coverage hits, but it won't find the ones that you encounter in production.
What's the performance like? Not too bad! Previous publications [0] have cited
2.7 to 4.5% averages. We've commmitted a few patches over the last few months to
address specific regressions, both in code size and performance. In all cases,
the optimizations are generally useful, but variable initialization benefits
from them a lot more than regular code does. We've got a handful of other
optimizations in mind, but the code is in good enough shape and has found enough
latent issues that it's a good time to get the change reviewed, checked in, and
have others kick the tires. We'll continue reducing overheads as we try this out
on diverse codebases.
Is it a good idea? Security-minded folks think so, and apparently so does the
Microsoft Visual Studio team [1] who say "Between 2017 and mid 2018, this
feature would have killed 49 MSRC cases that involved uninitialized struct data
leaking across a trust boundary. It would have also mitigated a number of bugs
involving uninitialized struct data being used directly.". They seem to use pure
zero initialization, and claim to have taken the overheads down to within noise.
Don't just trust Microsoft though, here's another relevant person asking for
this [2]. It's been proposed for GCC [3] and LLVM [4] before.
What are the caveats? A few!
- Variables declared in unreachable code, and used later, aren't initialized.
This goto, Duff's device, other objectionable uses of switch. This should
instead be a hard-error in any serious codebase.
- Volatile stack variables are still weird. That's pre-existing, it's really
the language's fault and this patch keeps it weird. We should deprecate
volatile [5].
- As noted above, padding isn't fully handled yet.
I don't think these caveats make the patch untenable because they can be
addressed separately.
Should this be on by default? Maybe, in some circumstances. It's a conversation
we can have when we've tried it out sufficiently, and we're confident that we've
eliminated enough of the overheads that most codebases would want to opt-in.
Let's keep our precious undefined behavior until that point in time.
How do I use it:
1. On the command-line:
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=uninitialized (the default)
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang
2. Using an attribute:
int dont_initialize_me __attribute((uninitialized));
[0]: https://users.elis.ugent.be/~jsartor/researchDocs/OOPSLA2011Zero-submit.pdf
[1]: https://twitter.com/JosephBialek/status/1062774315098112001
[2]: https://outflux.net/slides/2018/lss/danger.pdf
[3]: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00615.html
[4]: 776a0955ef
[5]: http://wg21.link/p1152
I've also posted an RFC to cfe-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060172.html
<rdar://problem/39131435>
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604
llvm-svn: 349442
Summary:
This patch adds `__builtin_launder`, which is required to implement `std::launder`. Additionally GCC provides `__builtin_launder`, so thing brings Clang in-line with GCC.
I'm not exactly sure what magic `__builtin_launder` requires, but based on previous discussions this patch applies a `@llvm.invariant.group.barrier`. As noted in previous discussions, this may not be enough to correctly handle vtables.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristina, Romain-Geissler-1A, erichkeane, amharc, jroelofs, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40218
llvm-svn: 349195
As reported in PR39946, these two implementations cause stack overflows
to occur when a type recursively contains itself. While this only
happens when an incomplete version of itself is used by membership (and
thus an otherwise invalid program), the crashes might be surprising.
The solution here is to replace the recursive implementation with one
that uses a std::vector as a queue. Old values are kept around to
prevent re-checking already checked types.
Change-Id: I582bb27147104763d7daefcfee39d91f408b9fa8
llvm-svn: 348899
Only explicitly look through integer and floating-point promotion where the result type is actually a promotion, which is not always the case for bit-fields in C.
llvm-svn: 348889
The attribute specifies that the call of the C++ method consumes a
reference to "this".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55155
llvm-svn: 348532
Support the Swift calling convention on Windows ARM and AArch64. Both
of these conform to the AAPCS, AAPCS64 calling convention, and LLVM has
been adjusted to account for the register usage. Ensure that the
frontend passes this into the backend. This allows the swift runtime to
be built for Windows.
llvm-svn: 348454
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This moves everything primarily testing the functionality of -ast-dump and -ast-print into their own directory, rather than leaving the tests spread around the testing directory.
llvm-svn: 348017
The addition adds three attributes for communicating ownership,
analogous to existing NS_ and CF_ attributes.
The attributes are meant to be used for communicating ownership of all
objects in XNU (Darwin kernel) and all of the kernel modules.
The ownership model there is very similar, but still different from the
Foundation model, so we think that introducing a new family of
attributes is appropriate.
The addition required a sizeable refactoring of the existing code for
CF_ and NS_ ownership attributes, due to tight coupling and the fact
that differentiating between the types was previously done using a
boolean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54912
llvm-svn: 347947
As a followup to r347805, allow forward declarations of cpu-dispatch and
cpu-specific for the same reasons.
Change-Id: Ic1bde9be369b1f8f1d47d58e6fbdc2f9dfcdd785
llvm-svn: 347812
Declarations without the attribute were disallowed because it would be
ambiguous which 'target' it was supposed to be on. For example:
void ___attribute__((target("v1"))) foo();
void foo(); // Redecl of above, or fwd decl of below?
void ___attribute__((target("v2"))) foo();
However, a first declaration doesn't have that problem, and erroring
prevents it from working in cases where the forward declaration is
useful.
Additionally, a forward declaration of target==default wouldn't properly
cause multiversioning, so this patch fixes that.
The patch was not split since the 'default' fix would require
implementing the same check for that case, followed by undoing the same
change for the fwd-decl implementation.
Change-Id: I66f2c5bc2477bcd3f7544b9c16c83ece257077b0
llvm-svn: 347805
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
A __builtin_constant_p may end up with a constant after inlining. Use
the is.constant intrinsic if it's a variable that's in a context where
it may resolve to a constant, e.g., an argument to a function after
inlining.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Subscribers: jfb, kristina, cfe-commits, nickdesaulniers, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54355
llvm-svn: 347294
There are 2 function variations with vector type parameter. When we call them with argument of different vector type we would prefer to
choose the variation with implicit argument conversion of compatible vector type instead of incompatible vector type. For example,
typedef float __v4sf __attribute__((__vector_size__(16)));
void f(vector float);
void f(vector signed int);
int main {
__v4sf a;
f(a);
}
Here, we'd like to choose f(vector float) but not report an ambiguous call error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53417
llvm-svn: 347019
Summary:
GCC already catches these situations so we should handle it too.
GCC warns in C++ mode only (does anybody know why?). I think it is useful in C mode too.
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane, aaron.ballman, efriedma, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: efriedma, craig.topper, scanon, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52835
llvm-svn: 346865
This avoids spurious warnings, but could use
a lot of work. For example the number of vector
elements is not verified, and the passed
value type is not checked.
Fixes bug 39486
llvm-svn: 346806
Summary: This adds support for Swift platform availability attributes. It's largely a port of the changes made to https://github.com/apple/swift-clang/ for Swift availability attributes. Specifically, 84b5a21c31 and e5b87f265a . The implementation of attribute_availability_swift is a little different and additional tests in test/Index/availability.c were added.
Reviewers: manmanren, friss, doug.gregor, arphaman, jfb, erik.pilkington, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, ColinKinloch, jrmuizel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50318
llvm-svn: 346633
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
Gabor Horvath