This allows lowering i8 and i16 arguments if they can fit in the registers. Note
that the lowering is incomplete - ABI extensions are handled in a subsequent
patch.
(Last part of)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27704
llvm-svn: 290106
Teach the instruction selector and legalizer that it's ok to have adds with 8 or
16-bit integers.
This is the second part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D27704
llvm-svn: 290105
Teach the instruction selector that it's ok to copy small values from physical
registers.
First part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D27704
llvm-svn: 290104
PWR9 processor model for instruction scheduling. A subsequent patch will migrate
PWR9 to Post RA MIScheduler.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24525
llvm-svn: 290102
AArch64 TLSDESC for local symbol in shared objects are implemented in a
arch specific manner where the TLSDESC dynamic relocation addend is the
symbol VM inside the TLS block. For instance, with a shared library
created from the code:
--
static __thread int32_t x1;
static __thread int64_t x2;
int32_t foo1 (int32_t x)
{
x1 += x;
return x;
}
int64_t foo2 (int64_t x)
{
x2 += x;
return x;
}
--
The dynamic relocation should be create as:
Relocations [
Section (N) .rela.dyn {
<Address1> R_AARCH64_TLSDESC - 0x0
<Address2> R_AARCH64_TLSDESC - 0x8
}
]
Where 0x0 addend in first dynamic relocation is the address of 'x1'
in TLS block and '0x8' is the address of 'x2'.
Checked against test-suite on aarch64-linux-gnu.
llvm-svn: 290099
This adds support for lowering more than 4 arguments (although still i32 only).
It uses the handleAssignments / ValueHandler infrastructure extracted from
the AArch64 backend in r288658.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27195
llvm-svn: 290098
Summary:
Added pair of directives .hsa_code_object_metadata/.end_hsa_code_object_metadata.
Between them user can put YAML string that would be directly put to the generated note. E.g.:
'''
.hsa_code_object_metadata
{
amd.MDVersion: [ 2, 0 ]
}
.end_hsa_code_object_metadata
'''
Based on D25046
Reviewers: vpykhtin, nhaustov, yaxunl, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, mgorny, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27619
llvm-svn: 290097
Add support for selecting simple G_LOAD and G_FRAME_INDEX instructions (32-bit
scalars only). This will be useful for functions that need to pass arguments on
the stack.
First part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D27195.
llvm-svn: 290096
Summary:
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo() is for some reason not
symmetric when comparing bundles, which gives us the
property:
I1->isIdenticalTo(*I2) != I2->isIdenticalTo(*I1)
when comparing bundles where one bundle is longer than
the other.
This patch makes sure that bundles of different length
always are considered as not being identical. Thus, the
result of the comparison will be the same regardless of
which side that happens to be to the left.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, jonpa, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27508
llvm-svn: 290095
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro() << "Some long text "
<< some_variable << "\n";
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro()
<< "Some long text " << some_variable << "\n";
Short logging statements are already special cased in a different part
of the code.
llvm-svn: 290094
The original version of the code in XRayInstrumentation.cpp assumed that
functions may not have empty machine basic blocks (or that the first one
couldn't be). This change addresses that by special-casing that specific
situation.
We provide two .mir test-cases to make sure we're handling this
appropriately.
Fixes llvm.org/PR31424.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: varno, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27913
llvm-svn: 290091
We still want to try in linewrap within single elements of a 1-column
list.
After:
Type *Params[] = {PointerType::getUnqual(FunctionType::get(
Builder.getVoidTy(), Builder.getInt8PtrTy(), false)),
Builder.getInt8PtrTy(),
Builder.getInt32Ty(),
LongType,
LongType,
LongType};
Before:
No line break in the first element, so column limit violation.
llvm-svn: 290090
column limit.
Single-column layout basically means that we format the list with one
element per line. Not doing that when there is a column limit violation
doesn't change the fact that there is an item that doesn't fit within
the column limit.
Before (with a column limit of 30):
std::vector<int> a = {
aaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa};
After:
std::vector<int> a = {
aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa};
(and previously we would have formatted like "After" it wasn't for the one
item that is too long)
llvm-svn: 290084
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
Missed a couple of files:
- Using #pragma once
- Missing top-matter for headers
- Missing an include for <cstdint>
Follow-up on D25360.
llvm-svn: 290079
Use of CachedHashStringRef makes sense only when we reuse hash values.
Sprinkling it to all DenseMap has no benefits and just complicates data types.
Basically we shouldn't use CachedHashStringRef unless there is a strong
reason to to do so.
llvm-svn: 290076
Summary:
Getting rid of the distance number altogether because:
- a person knowledgeable enough to know what the message means will also
know how to do hexadecimal math (with the help of a calculator)
- numbers outside INT_MIN - INT_MAX are hard to comprehend anyway
This unbreaks the case when you dynamically link a library with XRay and
it exits pre-main() with a not very informative static string.
Author: pelikan
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27894
llvm-svn: 290074
* a dependent non-type using-declaration within a function template can be
valid, as it can refer to an enumerator, so don't reject it in the template
definition
* we can partially substitute into a dependent using-declaration if it appears
within a (local class in a) generic lambda within a function template, which
means an UnresolvedUsing*Decl doesn't necessarily instantiate to a UsingDecl.
llvm-svn: 290071
Make sure FileCheck --strict-whitespace --match-full-lines translates
'CHECK: bla ' into pattern '^ bla $' instead of pattern '^bla$'.
llvm-svn: 290069
Long is not the same size across a number of the platforms we support.
Use unsigned int here instead, it is more appropriate because
overflow/wrap-around is possible and, in this case, expected.
llvm-svn: 290068
Background/motivation - I was circling back around to:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
I made a simple patch for that and noticed some regressions, so added test cases for
those with rL281055, and this is hopefully the minimal fix for just those cases.
But as you can see from the surrounding untouched folds, we are missing commuted patterns
all over the place, and of course there are no regression tests to cover any of those cases.
We could sprinkle "m_c_" dust all over this file and catch most of the missing folds, but
then we still wouldn't have test coverage, and we'd still miss some fraction of commuted
patterns because they require adjustments to the match order.
I'm aware of the concern about the potential compile-time performance impact of adding
matches like this (currently being discussed on llvm-dev), but I don't think there's any
evidence yet to suggest that handling commutative pattern matching more thoroughly is not
a worthwhile goal of InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24419
llvm-svn: 290067
Not sure whether it causes and ASAN false positive or whether it
actually leads to incorrect code or whether it even exposes bad code.
Hans, I'll get you instructions to reproduce this.
llvm-svn: 290066
Commit on behalf of Gadi Haber
Removed EVEX_V512 prefix from scalar EVEX instructions since HW ignores L'L bits anyway (LIG). 4 instructions are modified.
The changed encodings are validated with XED.
Rviewers: delena, igorb
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27802
llvm-svn: 290065
I thought for a while about how to remove it, but it looks like we
can just copy the file for now. Of course I'm not happy about that,
but it's just less than 50 lines of code, and we already have
duplicate code in Error.h and some other places. I want to solve
them all at once later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27819
llvm-svn: 290062
Sanjay Patel