Since the base pointer of a possibly aliasing pointer might not alias
with any other pointer it (the base pointer) might not be tagged as
"required invariant". However, we need it do be in order to compare
the accessed addresses of the derived (possibly aliasing) pointer.
This patch also tries to clean up the load hoisting a little bit.
llvm-svn: 270412
Truncate operations are basically modulo operations, thus we can model
them that way. However, for large types we assume the operand to fit
in the new type size instead of introducing a modulo with a very large
constant.
llvm-svn: 269300
We utilize assumptions on the input to model IR in polyhedral world.
To verify these assumptions we version the code and guard it with a
runtime-check (RTC). However, since the RTCs are themselves generated
from the polyhedral representation we generate them under the same
assumptions that they should verify. In other words, the guarantees
that we try to provide with the RTCs do not hold for the RTCs
themselves. To this end it is necessary to employ a different check
for the RTCs that will verify the assumptions did hold for them too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20165
llvm-svn: 269299
Min/max expressions are easier to read and can in some cases also result in
more concise IR that is generated as the min/max --- when lowered to a
cmp+select pattern -- commonly has a simpler condition then the ternary
condition isl would normally generate.
llvm-svn: 268855
After zero-extend operations and unsigned comparisons we now allow
unsigned divisions. The handling is basically the same as for signed
division, except the interpretation of the operands. As the divisor
has to be constant in both cases we can simply interpret it as an
unsigned value without additional complexity in the representation.
For the dividend we could choose from the different representation
schemes introduced for zero-extend operations but for now we will
simply use an assumption.
llvm-svn: 268032
Instead of matching for %6, we use a regexp to match for the result strings.
This test case caused unrelated noise in http://reviews.llvm.org/D15722.
llvm-svn: 267875
If the base pointer of an invariant load is is loaded conditionally, that
condition needs to hold for the invariant load too. The structure of the
program will imply this for domain constraints but not for imprecisions in
the modeling. To this end we will propagate the execution context of base
pointers during code generation and thus ensure the derived pointer does
not access an invalid base pointer.
llvm-svn: 267707
A zero-extended value can be interpreted as a piecewise defined signed
value. If the value was non-negative it stays the same, otherwise it
is the sum of the original value and 2^n where n is the bit-width of
the original (or operand) type. Examples:
zext i8 127 to i32 -> { [127] }
zext i8 -1 to i32 -> { [256 + (-1)] } = { [255] }
zext i8 %v to i32 -> [v] -> { [v] | v >= 0; [256 + v] | v < 0 }
However, LLVM/Scalar Evolution uses zero-extend (potentially lead by a
truncate) to represent some forms of modulo computation. The left-hand side
of the condition in the code below would result in the SCEV
"zext i1 <false, +, true>for.body" which is just another description
of the C expression "i & 1 != 0" or, equivalently, "i % 2 != 0".
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
if (i & 1 != 0 /* == i % 2 */)
/* do something */
If we do not make the modulo explicit but only use the mechanism described
above we will get the very restrictive assumption "N < 3", because for all
values of N >= 3 the SCEVAddRecExpr operand of the zero-extend would wrap.
Alternatively, we can make the modulo in the operand explicit in the
resulting piecewise function and thereby avoid the assumption on N. For the
example this would result in the following piecewise affine function:
{ [i0] -> [(1)] : 2*floor((-1 + i0)/2) = -1 + i0;
[i0] -> [(0)] : 2*floor((i0)/2) = i0 }
To this end we can first determine if the (immediate) operand of the
zero-extend can wrap and, in case it might, we will use explicit modulo
semantic to compute the result instead of emitting non-wrapping assumptions.
Note that operands with large bit-widths are less likely to be negative
because it would result in a very large access offset or loop bound after the
zero-extend. To this end one can optimistically assume the operand to be
positive and avoid the piecewise definition if the bit-width is bigger than
some threshold (here MaxZextSmallBitWidth).
We choose to go with a hybrid solution of all modeling techniques described
above. For small bit-widths (up to MaxZextSmallBitWidth) we will model the
wrapping explicitly and use a piecewise defined function. However, if the
bit-width is bigger than MaxZextSmallBitWidth we will employ overflow
assumptions and assume the "former negative" piece will not exist.
llvm-svn: 267408
Utilizing the record option for assumptions we can simplify the wrapping
assumption generation a lot. Additionally, we can now report locations
together with wrapping assumptions, though they might not be accurate yet.
llvm-svn: 266069
In r247147 we disabled pointer expressions because the IslExprBuilder did not
fully support them. This patch reintroduces them by simply treating them as
integers. The only special handling for pointers that is left detects the
comparison of two address_of operands and uses an unsigned compare.
llvm-svn: 265894
This reverts commit 2879c53e80e05497f408f21ce470d122e9f90f94.
Additionally, it adds SDiv and SRem instructions to the set of values
discovered by the findValues function even if we add the operands to
be able to recompute the SCEVs. In subfunctions we do not want to
recompute SDiv and SRem instructions but pass them instead as they
might have been created through the IslExprBuilder and are more
complicated than simple SDiv/SRem instructions in the code.
llvm-svn: 265873
The findValues() function did not look through div & srem instructions
that were part of the argument SCEV. However, in different other
places we already look through it. This mismatch caused us to preload
values in the wrong order.
llvm-svn: 265775
If all exiting blocks of a SCoP are error blocks and therefor not
represented we will not generate accesses and consequently no SAI
objects for exit PHIs. However, they are needed in the code generation
to generate the merge PHIs between the original and optimized region.
With this patch we enusre that the SAI objects for exit PHIs exist
even if all exiting blocks turn out to be eror blocks.
This fixes the crash reported in PR27207.
llvm-svn: 265393
As a CFG is often structured we can simplify the steps performed during
domain generation. When we push domain information we can utilize the
information from a block A to build the domain of a block B, if A dominates B
and there is no loop backede on a path from A to B. When we pull domain
information we can use information from a block A to build the domain of a
block B if B post-dominates A. This patch implements both ideas and thereby
simplifies domains that were not simplified by isl. For the FINAL basic block
in test/ScopInfo/complex-successor-structure-3.ll we used to build a universe
set with 81 basic sets. Now it actually is represented as universe set.
While the initial idea to utilize the graph structure depended on the
dominator and post-dominator tree we can use the available region
information as a coarse grained replacement. To this end we push the
region entry domain to the region exit and pull it from the region
entry for the region exit if applicable.
With this patch we now successfully compile
External/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench
and
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18450
llvm-svn: 265285
If a non-affine region PHI is generated we should not move the insert
point prior to the synthezised value in the same block as we might
split that block at the insert point later on. Only if the incoming
value should be placed in a different block we should change the
insertion point.
llvm-svn: 265132
These caused LNT failures due to new assertions when running with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-process-unprofitable for:
FAIL: clamscan.compile_time
FAIL: cjpeg.compile_time
FAIL: consumer-jpeg.compile_time
FAIL: shapes.compile_time
FAIL: clamscan.execution_time
FAIL: cjpeg.execution_time
FAIL: consumer-jpeg.execution_time
FAIL: shapes.execution_time
The failures have been introduced by r264782, but r264789 had to be reverted
as it depended on the earlier patch.
llvm-svn: 264885
As a CFG is often structured we can simplify the steps performed
during domain generation. When we push domain information we can
utilize the information from a block A to build the domain of a
block B, if A dominates B. When we pull domain information we can
use information from a block A to build the domain of a block B
if B post-dominates A. This patch implements both ideas and thereby
simplifies domains that were not simplified by isl. For the FINAL
basic block in
test/ScopInfo/complex-successor-structure-3.ll .
we used to build a universe set with 81 basic sets. Now it actually is
represented as universe set.
While the initial idea to utilize the graph structure depended on the
dominator and post-dominator tree we can use the available region
information as a coarse grained replacement. To this end we push the
region entry domain to the region exit and pull it from the region
entry for the region exit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18450
llvm-svn: 264789
Similar to r262612 we need to check not only the pointer SCEV and the
type of an alias group but also the actual access instruction. The
reason is again the same: The pointer SCEV is not flow sensitive but the
access function is. In r262612 we avoided consolidating alias groups
even though the pointer SCEV and the type were the same but the access
function was not. Here it is simpler as we can simply check all members
of an alias group against the given access instruction.
llvm-svn: 264274
When codegenerating invariant loads in some rare cases we cannot generate code
and bail out. This change ensures that we maintain a valid dominator tree
in these situations. This fixes llvm.org/PR26736
Contributed-by: Matthias Reisinger <d412vv1n@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 264142
ISL can conclude additional conditions on parameters from restrictions
on loop variables. Such conditions persist when leaving the loop and the
loop variable is projected out. This results in a narrower domain for
exiting the loop than entering it and is logically impossible for
non-infinite loops.
We fix this by not adding a lower bound i>=0 when constructing BB
domains, but defer it to when also the upper bound it computed, which
was done redundantly even before this patch.
This reduces the number of LNT fails with -polly-process-unprofitable
-polly-position=before-vectorizer from 8 to 6.
llvm-svn: 264118
Value merging is only necessary for scalars when they are used outside
of the scop. While an array's base pointer can be used after the scop,
it gets an extra ScopArrayInfo of type MK_Value. We used to generate
phi's for both of them, where one was assuming the reault of the other
phi would be the original value, because it has already been replaced by
the previous phi. This resulted in IR that the current IR verifier
allows, but is probably illegal.
This reduces the number of LNT test-suite fails with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-process-unprofitable
from 16 to 10.
Also see llvm.org/PR26718.
llvm-svn: 262629
Polly recognizes affine loops that ScalarEvolution does not, in
particular those with loop conditions that depend on hoisted invariant
loads. Check for SCEVAddRec dependencies on such loops and do not
consider their exit values as synthesizable because SCEVExpander would
generate them as expressions that depend on the original induction
variables. These are not available in generated code.
llvm-svn: 262404
In order to speed up compile time and to avoid random timeouts we now
separately track assumptions and restrictions. In this context
assumptions describe parameter valuations we need and restrictions
describe parameter valuations we do not allow. During AST generation
we create a runtime check for both, whereas the one for the
restrictions is negated before a conjunction is build.
Except the In-Bounds assumptions we currently only track restrictions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17247
llvm-svn: 262328
The generated dedicated subregion exit block was assumed to have the same
dominance relation as the original exit block. This is incorrect if the exit
block receives other edges than only from the subregion, which results in that
e.g. the subregion's entry block does not dominate the exit block.
llvm-svn: 261865
From now on we bail only if a non-trivial alias group contains a non-affine
access, not when we discover aliasing and non-affine accesses are allowed.
llvm-svn: 261863
The test style guide defines that opt should get its input from stdin.
(instead by file argument to avoid that the file name appears in its
output)
CHECK-FORCED is not recognized by FileCheck; remove it.
llvm-svn: 261786
To support non-aligned accesses we introduce a virtual element size
for arrays that divides each access function used for this array. The
adjustment of the access function based on the element size of the
array was therefore moved after this virtual element size was
determined, thus after all accesses have been created.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17246
llvm-svn: 261226
A load can only be invariant if its base pointer is invariant too. To
this end, we check if the base pointer is defined inside the region or
outside. In the former case we recursively check if we can (and
therefore will) hoist the base pointer too. Only if that happends we
can hoist the load.
llvm-svn: 260886
This reverts commit 98efa006c96ac981c00d2e386ec1102bce9f549a.
The fix was broken since we do not use AA in the ScopDetection anymore to
check for invariant accesses.
llvm-svn: 260884
Before this patch it could happen that we did not hoist a load that
was a base pointer of another load even though AA already declared the
first one as invariant (during ScopDetection). If this case arises we
will now skipt the "can be overwriten" check because in this case the
over-approximating nature causes us to generate broken code.
llvm-svn: 260862
So far we separated constant factors from multiplications, however,
only when they are at the outermost level of a parameter SCEV. Now,
we also separate constant factors from the parameter SCEV if the
outermost expression is a SCEVAddRecExpr. With the changes to the
SCEVAffinator we can now improve the extractConstantFactor(...)
function at will without worrying about any other code part. Thus,
if needed we can implement a more comprehensive
extractConstantFactor(...) function that will traverse the SCEV
instead of looking only at the outermost level.
Four test cases were affected. One did not change much and the other
three were simplified.
llvm-svn: 260859
Johannes Doerfert