of a property just in case the property's getter happens to be +1.
We won't synthesize a getter for such a property, but we will allow
the user to define a +1 method for it.
rdar://13115896
llvm-svn: 178731
arguments in function prologue is done
with objc_StoreStrong to pair it with
similar objc_StoreStrong for release in function
epilogue. This is done with -O0 only.
// rdar://13145317
llvm-svn: 175698
combination of a load+objc_release; this is generally better
for tools that try to track why values are retained and
released. Also use objc_storeStrong when copying a block
(again, only at -O0), which requires us to do a preliminary
store of null in order to compensate for objc_storeStrong's
assign semantics.
llvm-svn: 166085
First, when synthesizing an explicitly strong/retain/copy property
of Class type, don't pretend during compatibility checking that the
property is actually assign. Instead, resolve incompatibilities
by secretly changing the type of *implicitly* __unsafe_unretained
Class ivars to be strong. This is moderately evil but better than
what we were doing.
Second, when synthesizing the setter for a strong property of
non-retainable type, be sure to use objc_setProperty. This is
possible when the property is decorated with the NSObject
attribute. This is an ugly, ugly corner of the language, and
we probably ought to deprecate it.
The first is rdar://problem/12039404; the second was noticed by
inspection while fixing the first.
llvm-svn: 162244
David Blaikie